A selected history of expectation bias in physics

Monwhea Jeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2186333

2005-08-28

Abstract:The beliefs of physicists can bias their results towards their expectations in a number of ways. We survey a variety of historical cases of expectation bias in observations, experiments, and calculations.

History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Do striking biases in mass inference reflect a flawed mental model of physics?

Alex Mitko,Jason Fischer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001399

2023-05-04

Abstract:To engage with the physical world, we rely on our intuitive sense of how objects will behave when we act on them or they interact with each other. Objects' latent properties such as mass and hardness determine how their physical interactions will unfold, and people have a keen ability to infer these latent properties by observing physical events. For example, we can precisely discriminate the relative masses of two objects when we see them collide. However, such inferences are sometimes subject to marked biases. When inferring mass from an observed collision, people consistently overestimate the mass of an incoming object that strikes a stationary one. Why? A number of plausible accounts have been put forward, variously arguing that the bias arises from rule-based reasoning, oversimplified stimuli, or noisy perceptual estimates of the scene dynamics. The implications of these views stand in stark contrast to one another: systematic biases may reveal a fundamental deficiency in the mental model of physical behavior, or they may be an expected consequence of reasoning over imperfect information. Here, we investigated all three accounts within a unified paradigm, presenting videos of real-world bowling ball collisions. We found that using richly detailed stimuli did not eliminate biases in mass inference. However, individual differences in the biases were task-specific and well-explained by noisy perceptual estimates rather than oversimplified physical inference mechanisms. Our findings collectively point toward an intuitive physics system that implements Newtonian principles but is subject to the quality of the information it operates on. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

psychology, experimental
How Do Expectations Shape Perception?

Floris P de Lange,Micha Heilbron,Peter Kok,Floris P. de Lange

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002

IF: 19.9

2018-09-01

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract:Perception and perceptual decision-making are strongly facilitated by prior knowledge about the probabilistic structure of the world. While the computational benefits of using prior expectation in perception are clear, there are myriad ways in which this computation can be realized. We review here recent advances in our understanding of the neural sources and targets of expectations in perception. Furthermore, we discuss Bayesian theories of perception that prescribe how an agent should integrate prior knowledge and sensory information, and investigate how current and future empirical data can inform and constrain computational frameworks that implement such probabilistic integration in perception.

behavioral sciences,psychology, experimental,neurosciences
Implicit expectation modulates multisensory perception

Mick Zeljko,Philip M. Grove,Ada Kritikos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02460-z

2022-03-01

Abstract:Abstract Stimulus statistics can induce expectations that in turn can influence multisensory perception. In three experiments, we manipulate perceptual history by biasing stimulus statistics and examined the effect of implicit expectations on the perceptual resolution of a bistable visual stimulus that is modulated by sound. First, we found a general effect of expectation such that responses were biased in line with the biased statistics and interpret this as a bias towards an implicitly expected outcome. Second, expectation did not influence the perception of all types of stimuli. In both Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, integrated audio-visual stimuli were affected by expectation but visual-only and unintegrated audio-visual stimuli were not. In Experiment 3 we examined the sensory versus interpretational effects of expectation and found that contrary to our predictions, an expectation of audio-visually integrated stimuli was associated with impaired multisensory integration compared to visual-only or unintegrated audio-visual stimuli. Our findings suggest that perceptual experience implicitly creates expectations that influence multisensory perception, which appear to be about perceptual outcomes rather than sensory stimuli. Finally, in the case of resolving perceptual ambiguity, the expectation effect is an effect on cognitive rather than sensory processes.
The shadowing effect of initial expectation on learning asymmetry

Yinmei Ni,Jingwei Sun,Jian Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010751

2023-07-24

Abstract:Evidence for positivity and optimism bias abounds in high-level belief updates. However, no consensus has been reached regarding whether learning asymmetries exist in more elementary forms of updates such as reinforcement learning (RL). In RL, the learning asymmetry concerns the sensitivity difference in incorporating positive and negative prediction errors (PE) into value estimation, namely the asymmetry of learning rates associated with positive and negative PEs. Although RL has been established as a canonical framework in characterizing interactions between agent and environment, the direction of learning asymmetry remains controversial. Here, we propose that part of the controversy stems from the fact that people may have different value expectations before entering the learning environment. Such a default value expectation influences how PEs are calculated and consequently biases subjects' choices. We test this hypothesis in two learning experiments with stable or varying reinforcement probabilities, across monetary gains, losses, and gain-loss mixed environments. Our results consistently support the model incorporating both asymmetric learning rates and the initial value expectation, highlighting the role of initial expectation in value updating and choice preference. Further simulation and model parameter recovery analyses confirm the unique contribution of initial value expectation in accessing learning rate asymmetry.
Potential fitting biases resulting from grouping data into variable width bins

S. Towers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.023

IF: 4.95

2014-07-01

Physics Letters B

Abstract:When reading peer-reviewed scientific literature describing any analysis of empirical data, it is natural and correct to proceed with the underlying assumption that experiments have made good faith efforts to ensure that their analyses yield unbiased results. However, particle physics experiments are expensive and time consuming to carry out, thus if an analysis has inherent bias (even if unintentional), much money and effort can be wasted trying to replicate or understand the results, particularly if the analysis is fundamental to our understanding of the universe.In this note we discuss the significant biases that can result from data binning schemes. As we will show, if data are binned such that they provide the best comparison to a particular (but incorrect) model, the resulting model parameter estimates when fitting to the binned data can be significantly biased, leading us to too often accept the model hypothesis when it is not in fact true. When using binned likelihood or least squares methods there is of course no a priori requirement that data bin sizes need to be constant, but we show that fitting to data grouped into variable width bins is particularly prone to produce biased results if the bin boundaries are chosen to optimize the comparison of the binned data to a wrong model. The degree of bias that can be achieved simply with variable binning can be surprisingly large.Fitting the data with an unbinned likelihood method, when possible to do so, is the best way for researchers to show that their analyses are not biased by binning effects. Failing that, equal bin widths should be employed as a cross-check of the fitting analysis whenever possible.

astronomy & astrophysics,physics, particles & fields, nuclear
Emergence of conformist thinking under strong paradigmatic pressure: The case of (Galilean) relativity

Estelle Blanquet,Éric Picholle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.04110

2019-12-06

Abstract:An extension of the Bachelardian notion of epistemological profile allows us to establish the appearance of a strong conformist thinking component following certain formulations of the Galilean concept of the relativity of motion, namely those associated to the idea that the Sun might revolve around Earth from certain points of view. We deduce the existence of a strong remanent paradigmatic pressure related to the Copernican paradigm. A study involving more than 2900 students, primary school teachers and future teachers shows a 97 percent prevalence of (pre-Galilean) Copernican conformism. The epistemological profiles of several high level academics, including professional physicists, a mathematician and a sociologist show that, under strong paradigmatic pressure, even professional scientists can shift from a scientific to a conformist way of thinking, possibly related in some cases to a gate-keeper posture. Even when desired, the personal shift to a more advanced (relativist) understanding of such a high-pressure issue as heliocentrism can be a lengthy process. Some consequences of this disturbing cognitive process for science education are also discussed.

Physics Education,History and Philosophy of Physics
Adaptive Sampling Policies Imply Biased Beliefs: A Generalization of the Hot Stove Effect

Jerker Denrell

2024-04-03

Abstract:The Hot Stove Effect is a negativity bias resulting from the adaptive character of learning. The mechanism is that learning algorithms that pursue alternatives with positive estimated values, but avoid alternatives with negative estimated values, will correct errors of overestimation but fail to correct errors of underestimation. Here, we generalize the theory behind the Hot Stove Effect to settings in which negative estimates do not necessarily lead to avoidance but to a smaller sample size (i.e., a learner selects fewer of alternative B if B is believed to be inferior but does not entirely avoid B). We formally demonstrate that the negativity bias remains in this set-up. We also show there is a negativity bias for Bayesian learners in the sense that most such learners underestimate the expected value of an alternative.

Machine Learning
WARNING: Physics Envy May Be Hazardous To Your Wealth!

Andrew W. Lo,Mark T. Mueller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1003.2688

2010-03-20

Abstract:The quantitative aspirations of economists and financial analysts have for many years been based on the belief that it should be possible to build models of economic systems - and financial markets in particular - that are as predictive as those in physics. While this perspective has led to a number of important breakthroughs in economics, "physics envy" has also created a false sense of mathematical precision in some cases. We speculate on the origins of physics envy, and then describe an alternate perspective of economic behavior based on a new taxonomy of uncertainty. We illustrate the relevance of this taxonomy with two concrete examples: the classical harmonic oscillator with some new twists that make physics look more like economics, and a quantitative equity market-neutral strategy. We conclude by offering a new interpretation of tail events, proposing an "uncertainty checklist" with which our taxonomy can be implemented, and considering the role that quants played in the current financial crisis.

Risk Management,Physics and Society
Comment on "Examining the effect of counter-narratives about physics on women's physics career intentions"

M. B. Weissman,J. M. Robins

2023-05-23

Abstract:A paper evaluating the effects of lessons intended to encourage high school students to continue physics studies made some important errors. One was to underestimate the width of confidence intervals by failing to use standard cluster randomization analysis. Another was to use a missing-data imputation program that inappropriately assumes that data are missing at random, leading to potential bias in estimating the effect. The last was to omit discussion of how the treatment used was likely to produce substantial social desirability survey response bias, eroding external validity.

Physics Education
The Causes and Consequences of Drifting Expectations

William J. Villano,Noah I. Kraus,T. Rick Reneau,Brittany A. Jaso,A. Ross Otto,Aaron S. Heller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241235930

IF: 10.172

2024-06-20

Psychological Science

Abstract:Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. Awaiting news of uncertain outcomes is distressing because the news might be disappointing. To prevent such disappointments, people often "brace for the worst," pessimistically lowering expectations before news arrives to decrease the possibility of surprising disappointment (a negative prediction error, or PE). Computational decision-making research commonly assumes that expectations do not drift within trials, yet it is unclear whether expectations pessimistically drift in real-world, high-stakes settings, what factors influence expectation drift, and whether it effectively buffers emotional responses to goal-relevant outcomes. Moreover, individuals learn from PEs to accurately anticipate future outcomes, but it is unknown whether expectation drift also impedes PE-based learning. In a sample of students awaiting exam grades (N = 625), we found that expectations often drift and tend to drift pessimistically. We demonstrate that bracing is preferentially modulated by uncertainty; it transiently buffers the initial emotional impact of negative PEs but impairs PE-based learning, counterintuitively sustaining uncertainty into the future.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Coping with expectation violations in education: the role of optimism bias and need for cognitive closure

Larissa Henss,Martin Pinquart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00783-5

2023-12-23

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Abstract:Although most individuals experience expectation violations in their educational years, individuals' coping strategies differ depending on situational and dispositional characteristics with potentially decisive influence on educational outcomes. As a situational characteristic, optimism bias indicates that individuals tend to update their expectations after unexpected positive feedback and to maintain their expectations after unexpected negative feedback. As a dispositional characteristic, a higher need for cognitive closure (NCC) indicates that individuals tend to both update (accommodation) and try to confirm expectations (assimilation) after unexpected negative feedback. To better understand mechanisms behind optimism bias and context-dependent effects of NCC in an educational context, we included controllability (attribution of success/failure to internal or external causes) and self-enhancement (amplifying positive self-relevant aspects) in an experimental case vignettes study. Our sample of n = 249 students was divided into four experimental groups (high/low controllability × positive/negative valence) and read four different case vignettes referring to expectation violations in an educational context. MANCOVA revealed that individuals updated their expectations after unexpected positive feedback only with stronger (vs. weaker) self-enhancement and that individuals maintained their expectations after unexpected negative feedback in controllable (vs. uncontrollable) situations. Furthermore, interindividual differences in NCC interacted with controllability in predicting expectation update. We conclude that considering the influences of controllability and self-enhancement, we can better understand and evaluate the adaptivity of the optimism bias and context-dependent effects of NCC in an educational context.

psychology, educational
Essential aspects of the spontaneous exchange bias effect

L. Bufaiçal,E. M. Bittar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172109

2024-05-17

Abstract:Here, we present a review of the phenomenology of the spontaneous exchange bias effect, a phenomenon in which some materials exhibit unidirectional magnetic anisotropy even without the assistance of an external magnetic field applied during its cooling process. We review and discuss the most critical advances in this field of research that flourished more than a decade ago, pointing out its main features as well as its similarities and dissimilarities with the conventional exchange bias effect that has been vastly investigated since the 1950 decade. Finally, we briefly overview the obstacles to advancement in the field and discuss what we believe could be promising roads to overcome them.

Materials Science
Bayesian inference in physics

Udo von Toussaint

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.83.943

IF: 50.485

2011-09-19

Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract:Bayesian inference provides a consistent method for the extraction of information from physics experiments even in ill-conditioned circumstances. The approach provides a unified rationale for data analysis, which both justifies many of the commonly used analysis procedures and reveals some of the implicit underlying assumptions. This review summarizes the general ideas of the Bayesian probability theory with emphasis on the application to the evaluation of experimental data. As case studies for Bayesian parameter estimation techniques examples ranging from extra-solar planet detection to the deconvolution of the apparatus functions for improving the energy resolution and change point estimation in time series are discussed. Special attention is paid to the numerical techniques suited for Bayesian analysis, with a focus on recent developments of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for high-dimensional integration problems. Bayesian model comparison, the quantitative ranking of models for the explanation of a given data set, is illustrated with examples collected from cosmology, mass spectroscopy, and surface physics, covering problems such as background subtraction and automated outlier detection. Additionally the Bayesian inference techniques for the design and optimization of future experiments are introduced. Experiments, instead of being merely passive recording devices, can now be designed to adapt to measured data and to change the measurement strategy on the fly to maximize the information of an experiment. The applied key concepts and necessary numerical tools which provide the means of designing such inference chains and the crucial aspects of data fusion are summarized and some of the expected implications are highlighted.

physics, multidisciplinary
Is future bias just a manifestation of the temporal value asymmetry?

Eugene M. Caruso,Andrew J. Latham,Kristie Miller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2360673

2024-06-13

Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:Future-bias is the preference, all else being equal, for positive states of affairs to be located in the future not the past, and for negative states of affairs to be located in the past not the future. Three explanations for future-bias have been posited: the temporal metaphysics explanation , the practical irrelevance explanation , and the three mechanisms explanation . Understanding what explains future-bias is important not only for better understanding the phenomenon itself, but also because many philosophers think that which explanation is the correct one has implications for our evaluation of the normative status of future-bias. In this paper we focus on the connection between future-bias and the temporal value asymmetry. The latter refers to the fact that people tend to assign more value to a state of affairs when it is located in the future, as opposed to being equidistant in the past. All three candidate explanations offered for future-bias proceed by explaining the temporal value asymmetry, and then supposing that future-bias is simply a manifestation of that asymmetry. Recently, however, it has been argued that the conditions under which people display the temporal value asymmetry and future-bias are different, and that this is reason to doubt that the latter is a manifestation of the former. In this paper we empirically test one response to this argument against the manifestation thesis – the simulation response – according to which once we control for the degree to which people can simulate the object of their preference, we find that people display future-bias and the temporal value asymmetry in the same conditions. We find no evidence in favor of the simulation response. Moreover, our results support some previous research that suggests that the temporal value asymmetry is less robust than previously thought, and this in itself casts doubt on the idea that future bias is just a manifestation of this asymmetry.

psychology, multidisciplinary,ethics
Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models

D. Sornette

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/6/062001

2014-04-01

Abstract:This short review presents a selected history of the mutual fertilization between physics and economics, from Isaac Newton and Adam Smith to the present. The fundamentally different perspectives embraced in theories developed in financial economics compared with physics are dissected with the examples of the volatility smile and of the excess volatility puzzle. The role of the Ising model of phase transitions to model social and financial systems is reviewed, with the concepts of random utilities and the logit model as the analog of the Boltzmann factor in statistic physics. Recent extensions in term of quantum decision theory are also covered. A wealth of models are discussed briefly that build on the Ising model and generalize it to account for the many stylized facts of financial markets. A summary of the relevance of the Ising model and its extensions is provided to account for financial bubbles and crashes. The review would be incomplete if it would not cover the dynamical field of agent based models (ABMs), also known as computational economic models, of which the Ising-type models are just special ABM implementations. We formulate the ``Emerging Market Intelligence hypothesis'' to reconcile the pervasive presence of ``noise traders'' with the near efficiency of financial markets. Finally, we note that evolutionary biology, more than physics, is now playing a growing role to inspire models of financial markets.

General Finance,Physics and Society
How physics instruction impacts students' beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies

Adrian Madsen,Sarah B. McKagan,Eleanor C. Sayre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.6522

2015-05-29

Abstract:In this meta-analysis, we synthesize the results of 24 studies using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) and the Maryland Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX) to answer several questions: (1) How does physics instruction impact students' beliefs? (2) When do physics majors develop expert-like beliefs? and (3) How do students' beliefs impact their learning of physics? We report that in typical physics classes, students' beliefs deteriorate or at best stay the same. There are a few types of interventions, including an explicit focus on model-building and/or developing expert- like beliefs that lead to significant improvements in beliefs. Further, small courses and those for elementary education and non-science majors also result in improved beliefs. However, because the available data oversamples certain types of classes, it is unclear whether these improvements are actually due to the interventions, or due to the small class size, or student population typical of the kinds of classes in which these interventions are most often used. Physics majors tend to enter their undergraduate education with more expert-like beliefs than non-majors and these beliefs remain relatively stable throughout their undergraduate careers. Thus, typical physics courses appear to be selecting students who already have strong beliefs, rather than supporting students in developing strong beliefs. There is a small correlation between students' incoming beliefs about physics and their gains on conceptual mechanics surveys. This suggests that students with more expert-like incoming beliefs may learn more in their physics courses, but this finding should be further explored and replicated. Some unanswered questions remain. To answer these questions, we advocate several specific types of future studies.

Physics Education
Anomalous Fluctuations of Extremes in Many-Particle Diffusion

Jacob B. Hass,Aileen N. Carroll-Godfrey,Eric I. Corwin,Ivan Z. Corwin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.L022101

2023-08-03

Abstract:In many-particle diffusions, particles that move the furthest and fastest can play an outsized role in physical phenomena. A theoretical understanding of the behavior of such extreme particles is nascent. A classical model, in the spirit of Einstein's treatment of single-particle diffusion, has each particle taking independent homogeneous random walks. This, however, neglects the fact that all particles diffuse in a common and often inhomogeneous environment that can affect their motion. A more sophisticated model treats this common environment as a space-time random biasing field which influences each particle's independent motion. While the bulk (or typical particle) behavior of these two models has been found to match to high degree, recent theoretical work of Barraquand, Corwin and Le Doussal on a one-dimensional exactly solvable version of this random environment model suggests that the extreme behavior is quite different between the two models. We transform these asymptotic (in system size and time) results into physically applicable predictions. Using high precision numerical simulations we reconcile different asymptotic phases in a manner that matches numerics down to realistic system sizes, amenable to experimental confirmation. We characterize the behavior of extreme diffusion in the random environment model by the presence of a new phase with anomalous fluctuations related to the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class and equation.

Statistical Mechanics
The Evolution of Bias - Generalized

Lam Hui,Kyle P. Parfrey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0712.1162

2007-12-07

Astrophysics

Abstract:Fry (1996) showed that galaxy bias has the tendency to evolve towards unity, i.e. in the long run, the galaxy distribution tends to trace that of matter. Generalizing slightly Fry's reasoning, we show that his conclusion remains valid in theories of modified gravity (or equivalently, complex clustered dark energy). This is not surprising: as long as both galaxies and matter are subject to the same force, dynamics would drive them towards tracing each other. This holds, for instance, in theories where both galaxies and matter move on geodesics. This relaxation of bias towards unity is tempered by cosmic acceleration, however: the bias tends towards unity but does not quite make it, unless the formation bias were close to unity. Our argument is extended in a straightforward manner to the case of a stochastic or nonlinear bias. An important corollary is that dynamical evolution could imprint a scale dependence on the large scale galaxy bias. This is especially pronounced if non-standard gravity introduces new scales to the problem: the bias at different scales relaxes at different rates, the larger scales generally more slowly and retaining a longer memory of the initial bias. A consistency test of the current (general relativity + uniform dark energy) paradigm is therefore to look for departure from a scale independent bias on large scales. A simple way is to measure the relative bias of different populations of galaxies which are at different stages of bias relaxation. Lastly, we comment on the possibility of directly testing the Poisson equation on cosmological scales, as opposed to indirectly through the growth factor.
The Longshot Bias Is a Context Effect

Andrew Meyer,Sean Hundtofte

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4684

IF: 5.4

2023-04-09

Management Science

Abstract:In nearly every betting market, gamblers overvalue the riskiest bets. This “longshot bias” is usually explained by a tendency to overweight low-probability events. We offer a novel explanation: contrast effects enhance the attractiveness of longshots because gambles presented in terms of their payoffs are easier to compare along the payoff dimension than along the probability dimension. Our analysis of historical betting odds suggests that contrasts between gamble payoffs can explain the longshot bias. Laboratory experiments confirm those contrast effects and show that the longshot bias disappears when gamblers consider bets in isolation or when winning probabilities are easier to compare. This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, behavioral economics. Funding: The authors thank the University of Chicago’s Center for Decision Research and Richard Thaler for funding. Supplemental Material: The online supplement and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4684 .

management,operations research & management science
Prior expectations about own abilities bias self-belief formation and hinder subsequent revision

Alexander Schröder,Nora Czekalla,Annalina V Mayer,Lei Zhang,David S Stolz,Christoph W Korn,Susanne Diekelmann,Finn Luebber,Frieder M Paulus,Laura Müller-Pinzler,Sören Krach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.30.610443

2024-11-08

Abstract:Self-beliefs hinge on social feedback, but their formation and revision are not solely based on new information. Biases, such as confirming initial expectations, can lead to inaccurate self-beliefs. This study uses computational modeling to explore how initial expectations and confidence affect self-belief formation and revision in novel behavioral domains. In the first session, participants developed performance self-beliefs through trial-by-trial feedback. In the second session, feedback contingencies were reversed, requiring belief revision for accurate self-beliefs. Results showed a confirmation bias in belief updating, with initial expectations being linked to biased learning during both formation and revision. Higher confidence was associated with reduced belief revision and on average, self-beliefs persisted despite the conflicting evidence. This study extends the literature on confirmation bias to learning in uncharged, novel behavioral domains. Further, it demonstrates the importance of initial expectations and associated confidence for biased self-belief formation and subsequent learning.

Neuroscience

A selected history of expectation bias in physics

Do striking biases in mass inference reflect a flawed mental model of physics?

How Do Expectations Shape Perception?

Implicit expectation modulates multisensory perception

The shadowing effect of initial expectation on learning asymmetry

Potential fitting biases resulting from grouping data into variable width bins

Emergence of conformist thinking under strong paradigmatic pressure: The case of (Galilean) relativity

Adaptive Sampling Policies Imply Biased Beliefs: A Generalization of the Hot Stove Effect

WARNING: Physics Envy May Be Hazardous To Your Wealth!

Comment on "Examining the effect of counter-narratives about physics on women's physics career intentions"

The Causes and Consequences of Drifting Expectations

Coping with expectation violations in education: the role of optimism bias and need for cognitive closure

Essential aspects of the spontaneous exchange bias effect

Bayesian inference in physics

Is future bias just a manifestation of the temporal value asymmetry?

Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models

How physics instruction impacts students' beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies

Anomalous Fluctuations of Extremes in Many-Particle Diffusion

The Evolution of Bias - Generalized

The Longshot Bias Is a Context Effect

Prior expectations about own abilities bias self-belief formation and hinder subsequent revision