Abstract:Since Newton, all classical and quantum physics depends upon the "Newtonian Paradigm". Here the relevant variables of the system are identified. The boundary conditions creating the phase space of all possible values of the variables are defined. Then, given any initial condition, the differential equations of motion are integrated to yield an entailed trajectory in the phase space. It is fundamental to the Newtonian Paradigm that the set of possibilities that constitute the phase space is always definable and fixed ahead of time. All of this fails for the diachronic evolution of ever new adaptations in any biosphere. The central reason is that living cells achieve Constraint Closure and construct themselves. Living cells, evolving via heritable variation and Natural selection, adaptively construct new in the universe possibilities. The new possibilities are opportunities for new adaptations thereafter seized by heritable variation and Natural Selection. Surprisingly, we can neither define nor deduce the evolving phase spaces ahead of time. We can use no mathematics based on Set Theory to do so. These ever-new adaptations with ever-new relevant variables constitute the ever-changing phase space of evolving biospheres. Because of this, evolving biospheres are entirely outside the Newtonian Paradigm. One consequence is that for any universe such as ours there can be no Final Theory that entails all that comes to exist. The implications are large. We face a third major transition in science beyond the Pythagorean dream that "All is Number". We must give up deducing the diachronic evolution of the biosphere. All of physics, classical and quantum, however, apply to the analysis of existing life, a synchronic analysis. We begin to better understand the emergent creativity of an evolving biosphere. Thus, we are on the edge of inventing a physics-like new statistical mechanics of emergence.

Emergence of conformist thinking under strong paradigmatic pressure: The case of (Galilean) relativity

Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science

Public and teacher response to Einsteinian physics in schools

Social interaction and conceptual change pave the way away from children’s misconceptions about the Earth

Are we teaching students to think like scientists?

The relativity revolution from the perspective of historical epistemology

Perspectives in Quantum Physics: Epistemological, Ontological and Pedagogical. An investigation into student and expert perspectives on the physical interpretation of quantum mechanics, with implications for modern physics instruction

Einstein in the crossroad of the sciences, arts and humanities

History of Scientists? Elimination of Naive Beliefs about Movement - The testing of the theories of Galileo in his lifetime on board of a galley -

"Bring it on": Explaining persistence in science at the intersection of identity and epistemology

The role of context and culture in teaching physics: The implication of disciplinary differences

Case Study of a Successful Learner's Epistemological Framings of Quantum Mechanics.

Breaking Stereotypes: How Undergraduates' Life Experiences of Scientists Shape their Scopes of Possibility

Teach philosophy of science

Collective beliefs and individual stubbornness in the dynamics of public debates

Converging science and literature cultures: learning physics via The Little Prince novella

A New Scientific Revolution at the Horizon?

Beyond the Newtonian Paradigm: A Statistical Mechanics of Emergence

The role of conspiracy mentality in denial of science and susceptibility to viral deception about science

The Concept of Observer in Science Teaching in Middle School: Pre-Instructional Knowledge as a Lever for Learning rather than an Obstacle

Teaching the Einsteinian gravity paradigm