Abstract:Undergraduate quantum mechanics focuses on teaching through a wavefunction approach in the position-space representation. This leads to a differential equation perspective for teaching the material. However, we know that abstract representation-independent approaches often work better with students, by comparing student reactions to learning the series solution of the harmonic oscillator versus the abstract operator method. Because one can teach all of the solvable quantum problems using a similar abstract method, it brings up the question, which is likely to lead to a better student understanding? In work at Georgetown University and with edX, we have been teaching a class focused on an operator-forward viewpoint, which we like to call operator mechanics. It teaches quantum mechanics in a representation-independent fashion and allows for most of the math to be algebraic, rather than based on differential equations. It relies on four fundamental operator identities -- (i) the Leibniz rule for commutators; (ii) the Hadamard lemma; (iii) the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula; and (iv) the exponential disentangling identity. These identities allow one to solve eigenvalues, eigenstates and wavefunctions for all analytically solvable problems (including some not often included in undergraduate curricula, such as the Morse potential or the Poschl-Teller potential). It also allows for more advanced concepts relevant for quantum sensing, such as squeezed states, to be introduced in a simpler format than is conventionally done. In this paper, we illustrate the three approaches of matrix mechanics, wave mechanics, and operator mechanics, we show how one organizes a class in this new format, we summarize the experiences we have had with teaching quantum mechanics in this fashion and we describe how it allows us to focus the quantum curriculum on more modern 21st century topics appropriate for the

Case Study of a Successful Learner's Epistemological Framings of Quantum Mechanics.

Perspectives in Quantum Physics: Epistemological, Ontological and Pedagogical. An investigation into student and expert perspectives on the physical interpretation of quantum mechanics, with implications for modern physics instruction

Refined Characterization of Student Perspectives on Quantum Physics

A Deeper Look at Student Learning of Quantum Mechanics: the Case of Tunneling

Framing Difficulties in Quantum Mechanics

Student reasoning about quantum mechanics while working with physical experiments

Student Understanding of Some Quantum Physical Concepts: Wave Function, Schrödinger’s Wave Equation and Wave‐Particle Duality

Student evaluation of more or better experimental data in classical and quantum mechanics

Development of quantum perspectives in modern physics

A Review of Student Difficulties in Upper-Level Quantum Mechanics

'Because math': Epistemological stance or defusing social tension in QM?

A study on pre-service physics teachers' conceptualization on elementary quantum mechanics

Teaching Quantum Interpretations: Revisiting the goals and practices of introductory quantum physics courses

Should we trade off higher-level mathematics for abstraction to improve student understanding of quantum mechanics?

Ontological Flexibility and the Learning of Quantum Mechanics

Language of Physics, Language of Math: Disciplinary Culture and Dynamic Epistemology

Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators

Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses

Cognitive Issues in Learning Advanced Physics: An Example from Quantum Mechanics

Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education

Unpacking Students' Use of Mathematics in Upper-division Physics