Abstract:Analyses of human reaction to economic incentives reveal contradictory deviations from maximization. For example, underinvestment in the stock market suggests risk aversion, but insufficient diversification of financial assets suggests risk-seeking. Leading explanations for these contradictions assume that different choice environments (e.g., different framings) trigger different biases. Our analysis shows that variation in the choice environment is not a necessary condition. It demonstrates how certain changes in the incentive structure are sufficient to trigger six pairs of contradictory deviations from maximization even when the choice environment is fixed. Moreover, our analysis shows that the direction of these deviations can be captured by assuming that choice propensities reflect reliance on small samples of past experiences. In order to clarify the underlying processes, we considered distinct models of the reliance on small samples assumption, and compared them to classical models of choice (including prospect theory). The comparison focused on both within-individual, and between-group predictions (based on a preregistered study with 120 new tasks). The results reveal large advantage of "wide sampling" models that (in the static settings we examine) approximate an effort to rely on the most similar past experiences. Surprisingly, we also found that assuming that the parameters reflect stable individual traits impairs predictions; it seems that the number of "most similar past experiences" for each individual varies from task to task. These results suggest that ignoring the predictable impact of the incentive structure can lead to exaggeration of the importance of environment- and individual-specific decision biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Adaptive Sampling Policies Imply Biased Beliefs: A Generalization of the Hot Stove Effect

Rationally Biased Learning

Learning from a Biased Sample

Generalizing Off-Policy Learning under Sample Selection Bias

Classical Statistical (In-Sample) Intuitions Don't Generalize Well: A Note on Bias-Variance Tradeoffs, Overfitting and Moving from Fixed to Random Designs

The Longshot Bias Is a Context Effect

Bias Reduction in Sample-Based Optimization

The shadowing effect of initial expectation on learning asymmetry

Belief Bias Identification

Generalization in the Face of Adaptivity: A Bayesian Perspective

Adaptive agents may be smarter than you think: unbiasedness in adaptive expectations

Overconfidence and Prejudice

Risk Preferences of Learning Algorithms

Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians

The Importance of Pessimism in Fixed-Dataset Policy Optimization

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

Statistical Learning from Biased Training Samples

Addressing Maximization Bias in Reinforcement Learning with Two-Sample Testing

Simple learning models can illuminate biased results from choice titration experiments

Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning?

Learning with misattribution of reference dependence