Two Models for Bolometer and Microcalorimeter Detectors with Complex Thermal Architectures

J. W. Appel,M. Galeazzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.02.135

2005-12-07

Abstract:We have developed two analytical models to describe the performance of cryogenic microcalorimeters and bolometers. One of the models is suitable to describe Transition Edge Sensor (TES) detectors with an integrated absorber, the other is suitable for detectors with large absorbers. Both models take into account hot-electron decoupling and absorber decoupling. The differential equations describing these models have been solved using block diagram algebra. Each model has produced closed form solutions for the detector's responsivity, dynamic impedance, and noise equivalent power for phonon noise, Johnson noise, amplifier noise, 1/f noise, and load resistor noise.

Instrumentation and Detectors,Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the problem of performance modeling of low - temperature microcalorimeters and bolometers at extremely low temperatures (below 200 mK). Traditional simple models are no longer applicable at these temperatures because thermal fluctuations become significant and complex thermal architectures need to be considered. Specifically, the paper develops two analytical models to describe the performance of the following two types of detectors:

1. **Transition - Edge Sensor (TES) Detectors**: In this type of detector, the absorber and the thermometer are not isolated by an adhesive but are directly deposited together.

2. **Microcalorimeters with Large Absorbers**: In this case, the heat sink is connected to the absorber rather than the thermometer, which usually occurs when the absorber is much larger than the thermometer.

### Main Problems

- **Non - Ideal Effects**: The paper addresses non - ideal effects such as electron decoupling and absorber decoupling caused by extremely low temperatures. These effects make traditional assumptions no longer valid, and these components must be considered separately in the model.

- **Electro - Thermal Feedback**: At extremely low temperatures, the dependence of the thermometer resistance on the read - out power increases, making the ideal resistance - temperature relationship inaccurate. Therefore, the influence of electro - thermal feedback needs to be considered.

### Solutions

The authors use the block - diagram algebraic method in control theory to solve the differential equations describing these two models. Eventually, analytical solutions are obtained for the detector responsivity, dynamic impedance, and various noise sources (such as phonon noise, Johnson noise, amplifier noise, 1/f noise, and load - resistance noise).

### Key Results

- **Responsivity**: For Model 1, the responsivity \( S(\omega) \) is expressed as:
\[
S(\omega) = \frac{G_a}{(G_a + j\omega C_a)} \left[ \frac{(G_a + G_{e - l}(T_e)+ G_{ETF}+ j\omega C_e)- G_{e - l}(T_l)G_{e - l}(T_e)}{j\omega C + G_{e - l}(T_l)+ G} \right]-\frac{G_a^2 X\alpha A_{tr}}{T_e}
\]

- **Dynamic Impedance**: The dynamic impedance \( Z(\omega) \) describes the complex dynamic impedance of the detector, which is different from the static resistance of the detector because it takes into account the effect of electro - thermal feedback.

- **Noise - Equivalent Power (NEP)**: NEP quantifies the influence of noise on the detector performance and is defined as the input power required to produce an output equal to the noise signal. For different noise sources (such as amplifier noise, Johnson noise, etc.), NEP has different expressions.

### Application Examples

The paper also shows how to optimize the energy resolution and time constant of the detector by adjusting certain parameters (such as the heat capacity \( C_a \) and thermal conductivity \( G \) or \( G_a \) of the absorber). These results are presented in the form of contour maps, providing intuitive optimization guidance.

### Conclusion

Through accurate theoretical models and analytical solutions, researchers can better understand how the detector performance depends on manufacturing parameters and optimize the design accordingly, thereby significantly improving the performance of microcalorimeters and bolometers.