Abstract:A recent paper called for the abandonment of the term load (and training load) when used outside its mechanical meaning, claiming it is "unscientific" and "breaches scientific principles." In this article, we explain why its use does not breach any scientific principles and we clarify the process of labelling, conceptualising and operationalising a construct. Training load is simply a label attributed to a higher-order construct overarching other interrelated sub-dimensions. This multi-level structure provides a framework (nomological network) to support the research process and also practical applications. Load is a word, and therefore cannot be "unscientific". The "use" or "misuse" of words and terms entirely depends upon definitions that should be based on current understanding. Misuse occurs when a term is decontextualised or interpreted according to a unilateral perspective. The field of mechanics does not have a monopoly on the term load (or other common terms such as work, stress and fatigue), which are legitimately used in many scientific areas and with various meanings. The 'obligation' to rely on terms abiding by the Système International d'Unités (SI) when describing a construct is inappropriate. The SI relates to how we can measure, not describe training load; i.e., SI is relevant to its operational and not its constitutive (descriptive) definition. Discussions regarding shared and standardised descriptions and definitions are more relevant than discussions about discarding terms in sport and exercise science. Researchers (and practitioners) can continue to use the term training load as it does not breach any scientific principles.

Do we really need the weight force?

A literature review on the definition of the concept of weight

Measurements of the Influence of Acceleration and Temperature of Bodies on their Weight

Inertia, Gravity and the Meaning of Mass

"Never at rest": developing a conceptual framework for definitions of "force" in physics textbooks

Note on a New Fundamental Length Scale L Instead of the Newtonian Constant G

Why do we Still Believe in Newton's Law ? Facts, Myths and Methods in Gravitational Physics

The origin of inertia and the nature of inertial rest mass

The 'training load' construct: Why it is appropriate and scientific

Counterexamples to the Maximum Force Conjecture

Falling Bodies: the Obvious,the Subtle, and the Wrong

Rethinking the Effective Field Theory formulation of Gravity

New Weight Factor for Brownian Force Exerted on Micro/nano-Particles in Air Flow

Force, metric, or mass: Disambiguating causes of uniform gravity

Is there a universal concept of mass in fundamental physics?

Geometrodynamics, Inertia and the Quantum Vacuum

A critique of one of Galileo's mental experiments and an explanation on why bodies fall with equal acceleration through the vacuum

On the Independence of Electromagnetism and Gravitation from Test Bodies Physical Properties

Energy and equations of motion in a tentative theory of gravity with a privileged reference frame

Theoretical Value of the Gravitational Constant

Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant