Abstract:An overview of the experimental and observational status in gravitational physics is given, both for the known tests of general relativity and Newtonian gravity, but also for the increasing number of results where these theories run into problems, such as for dark matter, dark energy, and the Pioneer and flyby anomalies. It is argued that (1) scientific theories should be tested (2) current theories of gravity are poorly tested in the weak-acceleration regime (3) the measurements suggest that the anomalous phenomena have a common origin (4) it is useful to consider the present situation under a historical perspective and (5) it could well be that we still do not understand gravity. Proposals for improving the current use of scientific methods are given. `We do not know anything - this is the first. Therefore, we should be very modest - this is the second. Not to claim that we do know when we do not - this is the third. That's the kind of attitude I'd like to popularize. There is little hope for success.' (Karl Popper)

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are to comprehensively evaluate the experimental and observational status of gravitational theories (especially Newtonian gravity and general relativity) on different scales, and to explore the difficulties these theories encounter in certain phenomena. Specifically, the article mainly focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Verification of scientific theories**: Emphasize that scientific theories need to be verified through experiments and observations. 2. **Insufficient testing in the weak - acceleration region**: Point out that current gravitational theories lack sufficient experimental verification in the weak - acceleration region (such as dark matter, dark energy, and the Pioneer anomaly and other phenomena). 3. **Common origin of abnormal phenomena**: Propose that measurement results indicate that these abnormal phenomena may have a common origin. 4. **Importance of historical perspective**: Suggest re - examining current gravitational theories from a historical perspective. 5. **Uncertainty in the understanding of gravity**: Believe that we may still not fully understand the nature of gravity. ### Specific problems of the paper - **Dark matter and dark energy**: The current standard cosmological model introduces many parameters to explain observational data, but the actual physical meaning of these parameters is still unclear. For example, why does nature produce a value like 0.73? - **The correctness of gravitational theories on large scales**: Although Newtonian gravity and general relativity have been well verified on the scale of the solar system, on larger scales (such as galaxies and galaxy clusters), the validity of these theories has not been directly verified. - **The Pioneer anomaly and other spacecraft anomalies**: Some spacecraft (such as Pioneer 10 and 11) show unexplained acceleration changes, which may imply the limitations of existing gravitational theories. - **Galaxy rotation curves**: The rotation curves of most galaxies show a constant speed, rather than the expected Keplerian behavior, which is usually explained by dark matter, but the distribution of dark matter is difficult to explain this phenomenon. ### Summary This paper aims to reveal the limitations of existing gravitational theories in certain phenomena through a wide - ranging evaluation of them, and calls for re - thinking and improving existing scientific methods. The author believes that we should be more humble towards existing scientific theories, especially when facing new observational data, we should keep an open attitude and explore the possibility of alternative theories or modifying existing theories. Through these discussions, the author hopes to stimulate more research on the nature of gravity and provide guidance for future experimental design, especially for testing in the weak - acceleration region.

Why do we Still Believe in Newton's Law ? Facts, Myths and Methods in Gravitational Physics

Prospects of relativistic astrophysics: Viewpoints on the most influential journey

Could Galileo Discover the Law of Universal Gravitation in 1611, Was There Newton’s Apple and What Is “Modern Physics”?.

The Possibility of Curved Spacetime, Black Holes, and Big Bang is Less than One Billionth

Revisiting the mathematical synthesis of the laws of Kepler and Galileo leading to Newton's law of universal gravitation

Testing universal gravitation in the laboratory, or the significance of research on the mean density of the earth and big G, 1798–1898: changing pursuits and long-term methodological–experimental continuity

Plausibility arguments and universal gravitation

Probing Gravity -- Fundamental Aspects of Metric Theories and their Implications for Tests of General Relativity

Gravity Defied (from potato asteroids to magnetised neutron stars) II : The failed stars

Kant, Schlick and Friedman on Space, Time and Gravity in Light of Three Lessons from Particle Physics

Gravitational redshift revisited: inertia, geometry, and charge

Cosmological Constant $Λ$ vs. Massive Gravitons: A Case Study in General Relativity Exceptionalism vs. Particle Physics Egalitarianism

Beyond Einstein's General Relativity: Hybrid metric-Palatini gravity and curvature-matter couplings

Modifying Gravity: You Can't Always Get What You Want

Underdetermination in Classic and Modern Tests of General Relativity

Tests of the Universality of Free Fall for Strongly Self-Gravitating Bodies with Radio Pulsars

The Tic-Tac-Toe Theory of Gravity

Can gravity be repulsive?

Einsteinian gravitational concepts throughout secondary school

Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations

Gauge dependence and self-force from Galilean to Einsteinian free fall, compact stars falling into black holes, Hawking radiation and the Pisa tower at the general relativity centennial