The Possibility of Curved Spacetime, Black Holes, and Big Bang is Less than One Billionth

Jin He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0512614

2007-10-20

Abstract:Gravity whose nature is fundamental to the understanding of solar system, galaxies and the structure and evolution of the Universe, is theorized by the assumption of curved spacetime, according to Einstein`s general theory of relativity (EGR). Particles move on curved spacetime along straight lines (geodesics). In the last year, I proposed the mirrored version of EGR, the flat-spacetime general relativity (FGR), in which particles move along curved lines on flat spacetime. This puts gravitational study back to the traditional Lagrangian formulation. In fact, all claimed accurate verification of general relativity is the verification of FGR, because people when confronting GR to observational data, calculate time, distance, or angle by directly using the coordinates in Schwarzschild solution or in post Newtonian formulation. For example, people calculate the angles by directly using the coordinate $\phi$. However, only when spacetime is flat does there exists one coordinate system which has direct meaning of time, distance, angle, and vice verse. This is the famous Riemann theorem. Therefore, the more claims are made that classical tests of general relativity fit data with great accuracy, the more falsified is the curved-spacetime assumption. People made three such specious claims to EGR as collected in the present paper. However, FGR predicts observationally verified results consistently for solar system, galaxies, and the universe on the whole. I show that the possibility of curved spacetime, black holes, and big bang is less than one billionth. An experiment is proposed whose results will completely decide the fate of curved spacetime assumption. with the original article `Einstein`s Geometrization vs. Holonomic Cancellation of Gravity via Spatial Coordinate-rescale` attached.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the validity of the hypothesized space - time curvature, black holes and the Big Bang theory in Einstein's General Relativity (EGR). The author Jin He proposed a new theory of gravity, namely Flat - spacetime General Relativity (FGR), and questioned whether the traditional General Relativity based on space - time curvature can correctly interpret the observational data.

### Core problems of the paper:

1. **Validity of the space - time curvature hypothesis**:
- Traditional General Relativity assumes that space - time is curved, and this curvature is caused by matter and energy. However, the author believes that all precise verifications of General Relativity are actually verifications in flat space - time, not in truly curved space - time.
- The author cites the Riemann theorem, pointing out that only in flat space - time do coordinates have direct meanings of time, distance and angle. Therefore, calculating time, distance or angle using the Schwarzschild solution or the post - Newtonian formula actually assumes flat space - time.

2. **Reliability of classical General Relativity tests**:
- For example, the well - known light deflection experiments (such as the light deflection at the edge of the sun) usually use the coordinate φ to directly calculate the angle. However, according to the Riemann theorem, this should be a calculation in flat space - time. If strictly following the curved space - time geometry, the light deflection at the edge of the sun should be 1.65 arcseconds, while the actual observed value is 1.75 arcseconds, and the latter is the result based on flat space - time calculation.
- Therefore, the author believes that more classical tests claiming to be highly consistent with General Relativity are actually verifications of FGR, not EGR.

3. **Error of the equivalence principle**:
- Einstein's equivalence principle holds that within a sufficiently small space and time, all test particles will move with the same acceleration, so that gravity cannot be observed in a local freely - falling frame. However, the author has proven that the accelerations of different particles depend on their energy and angular momentum, so there is no universally applicable local acceleration to completely cancel out gravity.
- This means that Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong, which further questions the foundation of General Relativity based on this principle.

4. **Possibility of black holes and the Big Bang**:
- The author draws the conclusion through logical reasoning and mathematical derivation that the probability of assuming space - time curvature, black holes and the Big Bang is less than one in a billion. This conclusion is based on the consistency of FGR and a better interpretation of the observational data.

### Summary:
The main purpose of the paper is to question the basic assumptions of traditional General Relativity and propose a new theory of gravity - Flat - spacetime General Relativity (FGR). The author believes that FGR can better explain the existing observational data, and many concepts in traditional General Relativity (such as space - time curvature, black holes and the Big Bang) may be wrong.