Abstract:(Short abstract). In Galilean physics, the universality of free fall implies an inertial frame, which in turns implies that the mass m of the falling body is omitted. Otherwise, an additional acceleration proportional to m/M would rise either for an observer at the centre of mass of the system, or for an observer at a fixed distance from the centre of mass of M. These elementary, but overlooked, considerations fully respect the equivalence principle and the identity of an inertial or a gravitational pull for an observer in the Einstein cabin. They value as fore-runners of the self-force and gauge dependency in general relativity. The approximate nature of Galilei's law of free fall is explored herein. When stepping into general relativity, we report how the geodesic free fall into a black hole was the subject of an intense debate again centred on coordinate choice. Later, we describe how the infalling mass and the emitted gravitational radiation affect the free fall motion of a body. The general relativistic self-force might be dealt with to perfectly fit into a geodesic conception of motion. Then, embracing quantum mechanics, real black holes are not classical static objects any longer. Free fall has to handle the Hawking radiation, and leads us to new perspectives on the varying mass of the evaporating black hole and on the varying energy of the falling mass. Along the paper, we also estimate our findings for ordinary masses being dropped from a Galilean or Einsteinian Pisa-like tower with respect to the current state of the art drawn from precise measurements in ground and space laboratories, and to the constraints posed by quantum measurements. The appendix describes how education physics and high impact factor journals discuss the free fall. Finally, case studies conducted on undergraduate students and teachers are reviewed.

A critique of one of Galileo's mental experiments and an explanation on why bodies fall with equal acceleration through the vacuum

Falling Bodies: the Obvious,the Subtle, and the Wrong

Galileo’s law of free fall and modern science

Corpos no interior de um recipiente fechado e transparente em queda livre

Measuring the “weight” of human in vivo bio-inertia by legendary Galileo falling body experiments on a commercial 10m diving platform and gravitationally inversion of Newton's Three Laws of Motion into the Basic Laws of Evolution

Geometrodynamics, Inertia and the Quantum Vacuum

Breakdown of the Equivalence between Gravitational Mass and Energy for a Quantum Body: Theory and Suggested Experiments

Measurements of the Influence of Acceleration and Temperature of Bodies on their Weight

The origin of inertia and the nature of inertial rest mass

Inequivalence between gravitational mass and energy due to quantum effects at microscopic and macroscopic levels

Kant, Schlick and Friedman on Space, Time and Gravity in Light of Three Lessons from Particle Physics

Gauge dependence and self-force from Galilean to Einsteinian free fall, compact stars falling into black holes, Hawking radiation and the Pisa tower at the general relativity centennial

Why do we Still Believe in Newton's Law ? Facts, Myths and Methods in Gravitational Physics

Observation of the effect of gravity on the motion of antimatter

Intuitive physics of gravitational motion as shown by perceptual judgment and prediction-motion tasks

Violation of the Einstein's Equivalence Principle for a Composite Quantum Body

Testing the equivalence principle through freely falling quantum objects

Determining the difference between local acceleration and local gravity: applications of the equivalence principle to relativistic trajectories

Effective Inertial Frame in an Atom Interferometric Test of the Equivalence Principle

On the Equivalence Principle and Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies

Breakdown of the Einstein's Equivalence Principle for a quantum body