Transport in nanostructures: A comparison between nonequilibrium Green functions and density matrices

Andreas Wacker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44946-9_17

2001-05-16

Abstract:Stationary electric transport in semiconductor nanostructures is studied by the method of nonequilibrium Green functions. In the case of sequential tunneling the results are compared with density matrix theory, providing almost identical results. Nevertheless, the method of Green functions is easier to handle due to the availability of an absolute energy scale. It is demonstrated, that the transport in complicated structures, like quantum cascade lasers, can be described in reasonable agreement with experiment.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: to study the steady - state electrical transport in semiconductor nanostructures and compare the similarities and differences between the non - equilibrium Green's function method and the density matrix theory in dealing with such quantum transport problems. Specifically, the author hopes to show the advantages of the non - equilibrium Green's function method in dealing with the steady - state transport problems of complex structures (such as quantum cascade lasers).

### Core Problems of the Paper

1. **Choice of Quantum Transport Theories**
- The author explores two different quantum transport theories: the density - matrix - based method and the non - equilibrium Green's function - based method.
- By comparing these two methods, the author aims to illustrate the advantages of the non - equilibrium Green's function method when dealing with complex structures.

2. **Description of Steady - State Transport**
- The research mainly focuses on electrical transport under steady - state conditions, especially in complex semiconductor nanostructures, such as quantum cascade lasers.
- The author hopes to provide a powerful tool through the non - equilibrium Green's function method to describe the transport characteristics in these structures.

3. **Applicability and Accuracy of the Methods**
- The author compares the results of these two methods through a simple example (sequential tunneling between two adjacent quantum wells).
- The results show that although both methods can obtain almost the same results, the non - equilibrium Green's function method is easier to handle because it provides an absolute energy scale.

4. **Application in Complex Structures**
- Finally, the author shows the application of the non - equilibrium Green's function method in simulating quantum cascade lasers, proving that it can reasonably match the experimental results.

### Formula Summary

- **Hamiltonian**
\[
\hat{H}=\hat{H}_0 + \hat{U}+\hat{H}_{\text{scatt}}
\]
where:
\[
\hat{H}_0=\sum_{\alpha}E_{\alpha}a^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(t)a_{\alpha}(t)
\]
\[
\hat{U}=\sum_{\alpha,\beta}U_{\alpha,\beta}(t)a^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(t)a_{\beta}(t)
\]

- **Green's Function**
- Lesser Green's Function:
\[
G^<_{\alpha_1,\alpha_2}(t_1,t_2)=i\langle a^{\dagger}_{\alpha_2}(t_2)a_{\alpha_1}(t_1)\rangle
\]
- Retarded Green's Function:
\[
G^{\text{ret}}_{\alpha_1,\alpha_2}(t_1,t_2)=-i\Theta(t_1 - t_2)\langle a_{\alpha_1}(t_1)a^{\dagger}_{\alpha_2}(t_2)+a^{\dagger}_{\alpha_2}(t_2)a_{\alpha_1}(t_1)\rangle
\]

- **Self - Energy Equation**
\[
(E - E_{\alpha_1})G^{\text{ret/adv}}_{\alpha_1,\alpha_2}(E)-\sum_{\beta}U_{\alpha_1,\beta}G^{\text{ret/adv}}_{\beta,\alpha_2}(E)=\delta_{\alpha_1,\alpha_2}+\sum_{\beta}\Sigma^{\text{ret/adv}}_{\alpha_1,\beta}(E)G^{\text{ret/adv}}_{\beta,\alpha_2}(E)
\]

- **Current Formula**
\[
I_{a\rightarrow b}=