Abstract:Standard casino games such as roulette offer (almost) symmetric 50%-50% bets in a menu with numerous positively skewed gambles (with equal expected value). It is challenging to rationalize the popularity of casino gambling with traditional risk preferences. Yet, it is even more challenging to explain a more specific point that gamblers often choose (almost) symmetric 50%-50% gambles when casino offers positively skewed gambles. In this paper, we demonstrate that many well-known theories of decision making under risk cannot explain the finding that people place (almost) symmetric 50%-50% bets in roulette gambling. An expected utility maximizer either does not gamble on roulette at all (when utility function is concave or linear) or prefers to gamble on the longest possible shot and avoids (almost) symmetric 50%-50% bets (when utility function is sufficiently convex). Similarly, in Yaari's dual model, a decision maker either does not gamble on roulette (when probability weighting function is convex or linear) or gambles on the longest possible shot avoiding (almost) symmetric 50%-50% bets (when probability weighting function is sufficiently concave in the neighborhood of zero probability). In Viscusi's prospective reference theory, it can be optimal to gamble on several roulette numbers (rather than on one number) but not on one half of roulette numbers. A gambler who maximizes prospect theory never places a single bet on one half of roulette numbers due to the assumption of loss aversion.

Random Non-Expected Utility: Non-Uniqueness

Stochastic Monotonicity and Random Utility Models: The Good and The Ugly

Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility

Risk Neutrality Regions

Random Rank-Dependent Expected Utility

When No Price Is Right

Mixture independence foundations for expected utility

Risk Aversion and Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Economies with Two Goods and Arbitrary Endowments

Diversification preferences in the theory of choice

Background risk and small-stakes risk aversion

A puzzle of roulette gambling

Optimal sharing, equilibria, and welfare without risk aversion

Probabilistic Outcomes Are Valued Less in Expectation, Even Conditional on Their Realization

Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior

Utility Maximization, Risk Aversion, and Stochastic Dominance

Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy

What Are Asset Demand Tests of Expected Utility Really Testing?*

Local Utility and Multivariate Risk Aversion

Expected utility theory with probability grids and preference formation

On the solution uniqueness in portfolio optimization and risk analysis

A Non-Parametric Test of Risk Aversion