Abstract:SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Volume 10, Issue 2 , Page 394-429, January 2019. In the existing literature of robust utility maximization with ambiguity, agents are generally assumed to be extremely ambiguity-averse as they tend to only consider expected payoffs in the worst-case scenario. However, experimental studies have shown that agents' attitude to ambiguity is not systematically negative and can even be ambiguity-seeking when they consider themselves knowledgeable or competent. To conceptually distinguish between an agent's perception of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion, the so-called $\alpha$-maxmin expected utility ($\alpha$-MEU) was proposed in the economics literature as a linear aggregation of the most and least favorable prior beliefs. Although the axiomatic characterization of $\alpha$-MEU has been well studied, there has been little work on the benchmark maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU. The main difficulty stems from the dynamic inconsistency of two distinct extreme priors and nonconvexity (and nonconcavity) of the value function. In this paper, we study the maximization problem for $\alpha$-MEU and solve for the equilibrium strategies of open-loop type. Under logarithmic risk preference, we obtain the explicit form of equilibrium investment strategies, which involves a two-dimensional system of fully coupled quadratic backward stochastic differential equations (BSDE). The main challenge in completing the verification theorem is to study the existence, uniqueness, and stability of this system of BSDE. For this purpose, we consider a general Markov model of the financial market, which leads to a system of quadratic Markovian BSDE. We find that the equilibrium investment strategy becomes more conservative if the agent is more ambiguity-averse or the agent perceives more ambiguity in the financial market. The equilibrium strategy is close to the classical nonrobust strategy (without ambiguity) if the agent is ambiguity-neutral. As time approaches maturity, ambiguity-seeking (ambiguity-averse) agents adopt more aggressive (conservative) equilibrium strategies. Additionally, the equilibrium strategy of an ambiguity-neutral agent converges to the classical nonrobust strategy at maturity.

Utility Maximization, Risk Aversion, and Stochastic Dominance

On Utility Maximisation Under Model Uncertainty in Discrete-Time Markets

Robust Utility Maximization with Extremely Ambiguity-Loving and Ambiguity-Aversion Preferences

STABILITY OF THE EXPONENTIAL UTILITY MAXIMIZATION PROBLEM WITH RESPECT TO PREFERENCES

Distributionally robust portfolio maximization and marginal utility pricing in one period financial markets

Maximization of Non-Concave Utility Functions in Discrete-Time Financial Market Models

Utility maximization in constrained and unbounded financial markets: Applications to indifference valuation, regime switching, consumption and Epstein-Zin recursive utility

Robust Utility Maximizing Strategies under Model Uncertainty and their Convergence

Utility maximization in models with conditionally independent increments

Optimizing S-shaped utility and implications for risk management

Utility maximization in incomplete markets with default

On utility maximization without passing by the dual problem

On utility maximization in discrete-time financial market models

Optimal Investment with an Unbounded Random Endowment and Utility-Based Pricing

Stochastic Monotonicity and Random Utility Models: The Good and The Ugly

Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity

Equilibrium Strategies for Alpha-Maxmin Expected Utility Maximization

Optimal investment with bounded above utilities in discrete time markets

Utility Maximization Underg*-Expectation

Optimal sharing, equilibria, and welfare without risk aversion

Risk Aversion, Indivisible Timing Options, and Gambling