Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

An Efficient Epsilon Selection Method for DP-ERM with Expected Accuracy Constraints

Accuracy First: Selecting a Differential Privacy Level for Accuracy-Constrained ERM

Differential Privacy: An Economic Method for Choosing Epsilon

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Epsilon*: Privacy Metric for Machine Learning Models

DP-EM: Differentially Private Expectation Maximization

Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization

Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectives.

Privacy Profiles for Private Selection

A Differentially Private Weighted Empirical Risk Minimization Procedure and its Application to Outcome Weighted Learning

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data Under (ε,δ) -Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

Efficient Sparse Least Absolute Deviation Regression with Differential Privacy

Functional Mechanism: Regression Analysis under Differential Privacy

Distributed empirical risk minimization with differential privacy

Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General

Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacy

Training Private Models That Know What They Don't Know

Weighted distributed differential privacy ERM: Convex and non-convex

What Are the Chances? Explaining the Epsilon Parameter in Differential Privacy