Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data Under (ε,δ) -Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data under (ϵ, Δ)-Utility-optimized Local Differential Privacy

Utility Analysis and Enhancement of LDP Mechanisms in High-Dimensional Space

AAA: an Adaptive Mechanism for Locally Differential Private Mean Estimation

Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy for data collection and analysis

Analyzing Preference Data with Local Privacy: Optimal Utility and Enhanced Robustness

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

Providing Input-Discriminative Protection for Local Differential Privacy

Mean Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy Demands

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential Privacy

A Huber Loss Minimization Approach to Mean Estimation under User-level Differential Privacy

MPLDP: Multi-level Personalized Local Differential Privacy Method

On robustness and local differential privacy

Mean Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy: Some Privacy Can Be Free

A Utility-Optimized Framework for Personalized Private Histogram Estimation

Mechanisms for Robust Local Differential Privacy

PLDP:Personalized LDP for Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data

Learning with User-Level Local Differential Privacy