Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Distributed empirical risk minimization with differential privacy

Weighted distributed differential privacy ERM: Convex and non-convex

Differentially Private Distributed Resource Allocation Via Deviation Tracking

The Power of Sampling: Dimension-free Risk Bounds in Private ERM

Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization

Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General

Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectives.

Differential Privacy in Distributed Optimization with Gradient Tracking

Differentially Private Distributed Estimation and Learning

A(DP)$^2$SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

Data-Driven Optimization for Utility Providers with Differential Privacy of Users' Energy Profile

Distributed Least-Squares Optimization Solvers with Differential Privacy

DP-LSSGD: A Stochastic Optimization Method to Lift the Utility in Privacy-Preserving ERM

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differentially Private Worst-group Risk Minimization

Bypassing the Ambient Dimension: Private SGD with Gradient Subspace Identification

DP-EM: Differentially Private Expectation Maximization

Local Differential Private Data Aggregation for Discrete Distribution Estimation

Bring Your Own Algorithm for Optimal Differentially Private Stochastic Minimax Optimization

Accuracy First: Selecting a Differential Privacy Level for Accuracy-Constrained ERM

Output Perturbation for Differentially Private Convex Optimization: Faster and More General