Metasomatic ijolite, glimmerite, silicocarbonatite, and antiskarn formation: carbonatite and silicate phase equilibria in the system Na2O–CaO–K2O–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O–O2–CO2

Michael Anenburg,Jesse B. Walters,Walters, Jesse B.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-024-02109-0
IF: 4.1068
2024-04-09
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Abstract:Silicocarbonatites are carbonatite rocks containing > 20% silicate minerals. Their formation is not well understood due to low silica solubility in carbonatite melts and negligible amounts of silicate minerals on carbonatite melt cotectics at upper crustal conditions. We explore whether silicocarbonatites can be thought of as antiskarns: rocks formed by leaching of SiO 2 from siliceous wall rocks by carbonatite melts, and its deposition as solid silicate minerals by reaction with chemical components already present in the carbonatite melt. Solid state thermodynamic modelling at 1–5 kbar and 500–800 °C predicts that calcite–dolomite–magnetite assemblages will transform to dolomite-free silicocarbonatites with an increase in silica contents. In sodic systems, the formation of aegirine and alkali amphiboles suppresses silica activity despite elevated silica contents. Therefore, dolomite remains stable, but Fe 3+ is consumed, firstly from magnetite breakdown, and secondly by coupled Fe oxidation and reduction of CO 2 to CO, CH 4 , and graphite, particularly at higher pressures. Despite a net increase in Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ , the system evolves to increasingly lower oxygen fugacity. In aluminous systems, nepheline indicates high temperatures whereas alkali feldspars form at lower temperatures. Modelling of potassic systems demonstrates stability of mostly phlogopite-rich biotites, leading to Fe 2+ increase in all other carbonate and silicate phases. We find that perthites are expected in high pressures whereas two feldspars are more likely in lower pressures.
geochemistry & geophysics,mineralogy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper primarily explores the formation mechanisms of silicocarbonatites. Specifically, the authors attempt to answer the following core questions: 1. **Origin of Silicocarbonatites**: - The formation reason for the large amount of silicate minerals (over 20%) in silicocarbonatites is still unclear. Particularly, under upper crust conditions, the solubility of silicates in carbonatite melts is low, and at the eutectic point of carbonatite melts, they almost do not contain silicate minerals. 2. **Formation Mechanism of Antiskarns**: - Antiskarns refer to rocks formed by the extraction of silica from siliceous wall rocks by carbonatite melts and its deposition as solid silicate minerals. This paper explores the possibility of this process through thermodynamic simulations. 3. **Impact of Different Chemical Compositions on Phase Equilibrium**: - The study investigates the impact of silica and alumina contamination on phase equilibrium in sodium, potassium, and non-sodium carbonatite systems under different pressures (1–5 kbar) and temperatures (500–800°C). It focuses on how the calcite-dolomite-magnetite assemblage transforms into dolomite-free silicocarbonatites and the mineralogical changes with increasing silica content. 4. **Behavior of Iron Elements**: - How iron elements are distributed among different minerals during the carbonatite metasomatism process, especially in the case of silica contamination. The impact of the oxidation-reduction state of iron elements on oxygen fugacity is also a key focus of the study. 5. **Changes in Other Mineral Phases**: - The paper explores the potential formation of minerals such as feldspar and amphibole under different conditions and analyzes the distribution patterns of these minerals in natural carbonatite systems. Through these studies, the authors aim to provide new explanations for the origin of silicocarbonatites and their associated minerals, and to further understand the chemical exchange processes in carbonatite systems.