Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses of breast lesions based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging

Xue Li,Hong Zhu,Kun Sun,Weimin Chai,Wei Liu,Robert Grimm,Caixia Fu,Fuhua Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2022.09.008
IF: 3.13
2022-12-01
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS rs-EPI DWI), compared with readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (NOSMS rs-EPI DWI), in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study evaluated breast lesions from 185 consecutive patients who had undergone preoperative breast MRI. The NOSMS rs-EPI DWI and the prototype SMS rs-EPI DWI sequences were performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Two independent radiologists evaluated the image quality of the two sequences using a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) and then assessed the scores through visual grading characteristics analysis (VGC). The values of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and whole-tumor-based histogram parameter (ADCmedian) were compared between the two sequences using the Wilcoxon test. Then ROC curves were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe visual assessment showed that the SMS rs-EPI yielded superior overall image quality and lesion delineation than the NOSMS rs-EPI (AUCVGC = 0.980 and 0.984, respectively; all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in relevant artifacts between the two sequences (AUCVGC = 0.531, P = 0.462). The SNR values for SMS rs-EPI DWI were significantly lower than for NOSMS rs-EPI DWI (P = 0.019) while there was no significant difference in CNR values between the two sequences (P = 0.955). In addition, evaluation of the diagnostic performance demonstrated that the difference in ADCmedian values for both DWI sequences between the malignant and benign lesions was statistically significant (P < 0.001). In contrast, the AUC for ADCmedian was higher with SMS rs-EPI than NOSMS rs-EPI (0.879 for SMS vs. 0.839 for NOSMS, P = 0.025).ConclusionThe SMS technique could further improve the image quality and the diagnostic performance of rs-EPI DWI in a comparable time.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?