Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Comparative utility of MRI perfusion with MSIDR and DWIBS for the characterization of breast tumors.

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Predictive Ability of DWI/ADC and DCE-MRI Kinetic Parameters in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions and in Building a Prediction Model.

The Diagnostic Value of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging, Perfusion Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Imaging in Breast Lesions

MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging with Background Signal Suppression in Breast Cancer

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: Comparison with conventional DWI

Use of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Differentiation of Breast Tumors

Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Fat Suppression Using Short-Tau Inversion Recovery: Clinical Utility for Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Mr Imaging In Breast Cancer: Quantitative Analysis For Characterizing Lesions

Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China

Comparative Study of MRI Sequences Combined with Microvessel Density in Breast Tumor

Analysis of diagnostic value of DCE-MRI and DWI in breast cancer

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with T2-Weighted Images in the Detection of Small Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Multi-Observer Study

Comparatire study of enhanced MRI with combined non-enhanced MRI sequences in screening of breast lesions

The Value of MR-DWI in Differential Diagnosis of Non-Lactating Inflammatory Breast Diseases and Non-Mass Enhanced Breast Cancer

Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in detection and characterization of neoplastic breast lesions

Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses of breast lesions based on simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging

Multiparametric MRI model with synthetic MRI, DWI multi-quantitative parameters, and differential sub-sampling with cartesian ordering enables BI-RADS 4 lesions diagnosis with high accuracy

Contribution of IVIM to Conventional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Masses