Abstract:The motivational dimensional model of affect, proposed by Gable and Harmon-Jones (2010), posits that approach motivational intensity of positive affect modulates the influence of positive affect on cognition. In line with this model, accumulating evidences have supported this hypothesis. Studies have found that low approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., serenity) broadens, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect (e.g., desire) narrows cognitive breadth, such as the breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorization. However, little is known about whether the influence of positive affect on cognitive control, which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes, is modulated by the approach motivational intensity of positive affect. Therefore, two experiments in this study were conducted to investigate this issue. In experiment 1, a modified stop-signal task was used to explore the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on inhibition control. The stop signal task involved two concurrent tasks, a primary go task and a secondary stop task. The go task was a two-choice reaction time task that required participants to discriminate the location of black squares (2.4 cm × 2.4 cm) positing on the center of the left or right part of the screen. The stop task, which occurred pseudo-randomly and infrequently (25% of the total trials), involved presentation of a red circle (stop signal) that countermanded the go signal by instructing participants to inhibit their planned response to the go task on that trial. Ninety-one undergraduates were randomly assigned to the three conditions: low approach-motivated positive affect (31, 17 females), high approach-motivated positive affect (30, 16 females), and neutral (30, 16 females) conditions. One-way ANOVAs demonstrated that the effects of emotional pictures on response execution and inhibition were significant. Scheffe tests revealed that, relative to the neutral condition, response inhibition was faster in low approach-motivated positive affect condition, while response execution was faster in high approach-motivated positive affect condition. In experiment 2, we used typical numerical classification tasks to examine the influence of approach motivational intensity of positive affect on task switching. Eighty-four new undergraduates (48 females) were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions. Participants had to judge whether a digit (1~9, excluding 5) was smaller or larger than five (smaller–larger task) or whether it was odd or even (odd–even task). We used either a square or diamond frame with sides that were 4.8 cm in length as task cues to indicate the smaller–larger task or odd–even task, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVAs on reaction time and error rate showed that low approach-motivated positive affect facilitated switched task, while high approach-motivated positive affect facilitated repeated task. Results also indicated that low approach-motivated positive affect reduced reaction time and error switch costs, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect increased reaction time switch costs. In summary, this research suggests that low approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive flexibility, whereas high approach-motivated positive affect enhances cognitive stability. The current research extends previous work on cognitive breadth to cognitive control which partly reflects the temporality of cognitive processes. Taken together, this line of research suggests that the effects of positive affect on cognitive processes are modulated by its approach motivational intensity.

Why are some individuals better at using negative attentional templates to suppress distractors? Exploration of interindividual differences in cognitive control efficiency.

Neurophysiological Measures of Proactive and Reactive Control in Negative Template Use

Within-Subject manipulations of proactive control do not change negative templates benefits: Exploring the effect of reward on negative and positive cues

Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology

On the relationship between negative affective priming and prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms

Individual differences in attention allocation during a two-dimensional inhibitory control task

Proactive selective attention across competition contexts

The Effect of Low Versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control

Advancing the understanding of individual differences in attentional control: Theoretical, methodological, and analytical considerations

The Effects of Trait Impulsivity on Proactive and Reactive Interference Control.

The role of selective attention in the positivity offset: Evidence from event related potentials

The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.

Proactive selective attention across competition contexts.

Testing the contributions of proactive target and distractor templates in visual search performance

Individual differences in attention control: A meta-analysis and re-analysis of latent variable studies

The effects of self-control on cognitive resource allocation during sustained attention: a transcranial Doppler investigation

Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.

Individual differences in inhibitory control are not related to downregulation of negative emotion via distancing.

Negative Attentional Set in the Attentional Blink: Control is Not Lost

Attentional enhancement predicts individual differences in visual working memory under go/no-go search conditions

Memory Guidance in Distractor Suppression is Governed by the Availability of Cognitive Control