Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of different stitching methods, over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) and metal clips combined with nylon rope(King closure), for full-layer gastric wall defect. Methods Data of 75 cases, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastric SMTs from May 2015 to May 2018 in our endoscopy center were retrospectively analyzed. According to the closure method, the patients were divided into the OTSC group (20 cases) and the King closure group (55 cases). Comparison was made in gender, age, the largest diameter of tumor, the location of tumor, defect surface diameter, total operating time, defect closure time, closure success rate, the length of hospital stays, cost and postoperative complications between the two groups. Results The baseline data were comparable, and there were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, tumor diameter, and defect surface diameter between the two groups(all P>0.05). The success rate of closure was 100% in both groups. In terms of length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.13, P=0.268). The total operating time was 63.24±43.22 min in the King closure group versus 47.60±18.13 min in the OTSC group (t=2.20, P=0.030). The closure time of the defect surface was 20.85±16.35 min in the King closure group versus 10.95±5.20 min in the OTSC group (t=2.65, P=0.010). Hospitalization costs were 24 200±800 yuan in the King closure group versus 36 200±2 350 yuan in the OTSC group (t=6.21, P<0.001). Postoperative abdominal elevation radiographs in both groups indicated a small amount of subphrenic free gas, and no intervention was given due to the small amount of gas and no obvious symptoms. No late bleeding, recurrent perforation, infection or other complications occurred after operation, and all patients were discharged successfully. Six months after surgery, 15 patients (27%) in the King closure group developed metal clips or nylon rope residue, which were successfully removed by endoscopy. The anastomosis clamp of nighteen patients (95%) in the OTSC group were in the original position. None of the patient received open surgery. Conclusion OTSC and King closure are both safe and effective in the treatment of full-thickness defect of gastric wall. OTSC has the advantages of short total operation time and short closure time, but with high cost. Key words: Endoscopes, gastrointestinal; Submucosal tumors; Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Over-the-scope-clip system; King closure

Retrospective study of 189 cases of acute perforated peptic ulcer: safety and efficacy of over-the-scope-clip based endoscopic closure

Mo2049 Over-the-Scope Clip System Versus Endoloop Combined with Metal Clips Applied to Closure of Perforation in Gastric Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection: A Single-Center Prospective Comparison Study

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding in China: A Multicenter Endoscopic Survey of 1006 Patients

Reduced mortality for over-the-scope clips (OTSC) versus surgery for refractory peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective study

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Clinical outcomes of the over‐the‐scope clip closure after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter retrospective study

S4090 The Power of the Scope: A Case of ERCP-Related Duodenal Tear Repaired with Over-the-Scope Clip

Laparoscopic Versus Open Omental Patch Repair for Early Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: A retrospective cohort study

Efficacy of Over-the-scope Clip for Gastrointestinal Fistula

Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic purse-string suture-assisted closure for mucosal defects induced by endoscopic manipulations

Comparison of over-the-scope-clip and metal clips combined with nylon rope as endoscopic suture methods for full-thickness defect of gastric wall(with video)

Over-the-Scope Clip Applications as First-Line Therapy in the Treatment of Upper Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Perforations, and Fistulas

Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - study protocol

Over-the-scope clip as first-line treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TOP Study)

Association between prophylactic closure of mucosal defect and delayed adverse events after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers

An overview of history, pathogenesis and treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease with evaluation of prognostic scoring in adults

Combined endoscopic and radiologic intervention for management of acute perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial

Comparison of Over-the-Scope Clips to Standard Endoscopic Treatment as the Initial Treatment in Patients With Bleeding From a Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Cause

Comparison of Over-the-Scope Clips to Standard Endoscopic Treatment As the Initial Treatment in Patients with Bleeding from a Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Cause A Randomized Controlled Trial