The Use of Dynamic Navigation for the Placement of Zygoma Implants. A Cadaver Study to Compare Accuracy

Omran Bishbish,Yoon Jeong Kim,Joseph Kan,Jaime Lozada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/10.1563_aaid-joi-d-24-00026

2024-10-19

Journal of Oral Implantology

Abstract:CONCLUSION: Zygoma implants placed with a dynamic navigation device resulted in less apical and angular deviation than implants placed freehand..

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Dynamic Navigation-Guided Robotic Placement of Zygomatic Implants

Mohammed Y. Al-Jarsha,Yufeng Diao,Guodong Zhao,Muhammad A. Imran,Ashraf F. Ayoub,Douglas P. Robertson,Kurt B. Naudi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105463

IF: 4.991

2024-11-14

Journal of Dentistry

Abstract:Objectives : To assess the feasibility and accuracy of a new prototype robotic implant system for the placement of zygomatic implants in edentulous maxillary models. Methods : The study was carried out on eight plastic models. Cone beam computed tomographs were captured for each model to plan the positions of zygomatic implants. The hand-eye calibration technique was used to register the dynamic navigation system to the robotic spaces. A total of 16 zygomatic implants were placed, equally distributed between the anterior and the posterior parts of the zygoma. The placement of the implants (ZYGAN®, Southern Implants) was carried out using an active six-jointed robotic arm (UR3e, Universal Robots) guided by the dynamic navigation coordinate transformation matrix. The accuracy of the implant placement was assessed using EvaluNav and GeoMagicDesignX® software based on pre- and post-operative CBCT superimposition. Descriptive statistics for the implant deviations and Pearson's correlation analysis of these deviations to force feedback recorded by the robotic arm were conducted. Results : The 3D deviations at the entry and exit points were 1.80 ± 0.96 mm and 2.80 ± 0.95 mm, respectively. The angular deviation was 1.74 ± 0.92°. The overall registration time was 23.8 ± 7.0 minutes for each side of the model. Operative time excluding registration was 66.8 ± 8.8 minutes for each trajectory.The exit point and angular deviations of the implants were positively correlated with the drilling force perpendicular to the long axis of the handpiece and negatively correlated with the drilling force parallel to the long axis of the handpiece. Conclusion : The errors of the dynamic navigation-guided robotic placement of zygomatic implants were within the clinically acceptable limits. Further refinements are required to facilitate the clinical application of the tested integrated robotic-dynamic navigation system. Clinical Significance : Robotic placement of zygomatic implants has the potential to produce a highly predictable outcome irrespective of the operator's surgical experience or fatigue. The presented study paves the way for clinical applications.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Effect of Clinical Experience on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guidance: an in vitro Study

Qiao Fang,Jaime Lozada,Joseph Kan,Aladdin Al-Ardah,Yiming Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00181

2024-09-04

Abstract:This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of implants placed by clinicians with varying dental implant experience using dynamic navigation (DN) and static guidance (SG). Sixty identical custom-made drillable maxillary models were fabricated, missing the right central incisor (#8) and left first molar (#14) with simulated gingival tissue. Models planned with a dynamic navigation system and guided surgery software were randomly allocated to an experienced clinician, an inexperienced clinician, and a nonexperienced clinician. The accuracy of implant placement was evaluated by overlaying the preoperative virtual surgical plan with the postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan. Deviations between the placed and planned implants were quantified using a mathematical algorithm. Independent-sample t-tests revealed significant differences (p < 0.001) in angular deviation but not in coronal and apical deviations when comparing dynamic navigation with static guidance for all three clinicians. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test found no significant differences between clinicians of varying dental implant experience in dynamic navigation and static guidance groups. The study concluded that the level of dental implant experience and surgical site do not significantly impact the accuracy of implant placement when either dynamic navigation or static guidance is used. Dynamic navigation produced less angular deviation in comparison with static guidance. This finding suggests dynamic navigation could benefit clinical settings, particularly for less experienced clinicians.
Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study

Houzuo Guo,Xi Jiang,Ye Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105329

Abstract:Objectives: To compare the accuracy of robotic and dynamic navigation systems in assisting zygomatic implant (ZI) using an in vitro model experiment. Methods: Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients who underwent ZI treatment between 2011 and 2023 were collected from local databases. Corresponding three-dimensional resin models were printed and assigned to two groups: the robotic and dynamic navigation system groups. Following preoperative plans, ZIs were placed in the models with the assistance of either a robotic or dynamic navigation system. Deviations in the in vitro navigation surgery were measured and compared between the groups. Results: A total of 110 ZIs were placed in 56 models, with 55 ZIs in each group. No significant differences were observed in entry and angle deviations between the groups (p>0.05). However, the exit deviation in the robotic system group (2.39±1.24 mm) was larger than that in the dynamic navigation group (1.83±1.25 mm) (p<0.05). On the exit side, the Z-axis deviation in the robotic group (left: -0.28±1.43 mm, right: -0.21±1.30 mm) was smaller than that in the dynamic navigation group (left: 0.76±1.11 mm, right: 0.85±1.52 mm) (p<0.05), while no significant differences were found in X- and Y-axis deviations (p>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the dynamic navigation system, the robotic system can effectively prevent ZI overextension. However, its accuracy on the exit side is slightly lower than that of the dynamic navigation system. Clinical significance: This preliminary in vitro study showed that the accuracy of the robotic system was slightly inferior to that of the dynamic navigation system in terms of exit deviation when used in ZI placement. Further clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.
Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement

Dong Wu,Lin Zhou,Jin Yang,Bao Zhang,Yanjun Lin,Jiang Chen,Wenxiu Huang,Yonghui Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00272-0

2020-11-24

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Abstract:Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation (DN) with a static surgical guide (SSG) for dental implant placement and the influence factors such as the experience of the surgeon and the implant sites. Methods and materials A total of 38 implants, which underwent the dynamic navigation , and 57 implants which underwent a static surgical guide were enrolled in the retrospective study. Coronal deviation, apical deviation, and angular deviation were compared between the DN and SSG groups, along with the different experience level of surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the DN and SSG groups, and the experience level of the surgeons and implant sites in the DN group. However, the apical deviation of the DN was slightly higher than the SSG group in the anterior teeth ( P = 0.028), and the angular deviation of DN was smaller than the SSG group in the molar. Conclusion Dynamic navigation can achieve accurate implant placement as well as the static surgical guide. Additionally, the experience level of the surgeon and implant site do not influence the accuracy of dynamic navigation, while the accuracy of DN seems higher than the SSG in molar.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series

Jiayi Wang,Yanjun Ge,Sven Muhlemann,Shaoxia Pan,Ronald E. Jung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14168

2023-01-01

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of implant placement using a dynamic navigation system in fully edentulous jaws and to analyze the influence of implant distribution on implant position accuracy. Materials and Methods: Edentulous patients who received implant placement using a dynamic navigation system were included. Four to six mini screws were placed in the edentulous jaw under local anesthesia as fiducial markers. Then patients received CBCT scans. Virtual implant positions were designed in the planning software based on CBCT data. Under local anesthesia, implants were inserted under the guidance of the dynamic navigation system. CBCTs were taken following implant placement. The deviation between the actual and planned implant positions was measured by comparing the pre- and postsurgery CBCT. Results: A total of 13 edentulous patients with 13 edentulous maxillae and 7 edentulous mandibles were included, and 108 implants were placed. The average linear deviations at the implant entry point and apex were 1.08 +/- 0.52 mm and 1.15 +/- 0.60 mm, respectively. The average angular deviation was 2.85 +/- 1.20 degrees. No significant difference was detected in linear and angular deviations between the maxillary and mandibular implants, neither between the anterior and posterior implants. Conclusions: The dynamic navigation system provides high accuracy for implant placement in fully edentulous jaws, while the distribution of the implants showed little impact on implant position accuracy.
Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

Baoxin Tao,Yuan Feng,Xingqi Fan,Minjie Zhuang,Xiaojun Chen,Feng Wang,Yiqun Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170

Abstract:Objectives: To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic navigation and a robotic system. Methods: Eighty three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms, including edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, were assigned to two groups: a dynamic navigation system (Beidou-SNS) group and a robotic system (Hybrid Robotic System for Dental Implant Surgery, HRS-DIS) group. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the implants in 3D world were measured after pre-operative plans and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was applied, and a p value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 480 implants were placed in 80 phantoms. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation system and robotic system groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 0.96 ± 0.57 mm vs. 0.83 ± 0.55 mm (p=0.04), a mean exit deviation of 1.06 ± 0.59 mm vs. 0.91 ± 0.56 mm (p=0.04), and a mean angle deviation of 2.41± 1.42° vs. 1 ± 0.48° (p<0.00). Conclusions: The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that this prototype robotic system (HRS-DIS) could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery. Clinical significance: This in vitro study is of clinical interest because it preliminarily shows that a robotic system exhibits lower deviations of dental implants than a dynamic navigation system, in dental implant surgery, in both partially and completely edentulous jaws. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results.
Comparison of the accuracy of dynamic navigation and the free hand approaches in the placement of pterygoid implants in the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study

Baoxin Tao,Ningtao Wang,Xiaowan Ling,Lijuan Ye,Yiqun Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2024.01.024

IF: 3.719

2024-02-01

Journal of Dental Sciences

Abstract:Background/purpose Pterygoid implant is a promising solution for patients with a partially or fully edentulous atrophic maxilla. However, whether dynamic navigation system will improve the accuracy of pterygoid implant surgery is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation and free-hand approaches in pterygoid implant placement in completely edentulous maxilla models. Materials and methods Twenty three-dimensional (3D)-printed edentulous maxilla models were assigned to two groups: the dynamic navigation system group and the free-hand group. Two pterygoid implants were planned in the bilateral pterygomaxillary area and then placed in each model. The entry, exit and angle deviations of the pterygoid implants were measured after pre- and post-operative cone-beam CT (CBCT) image fusion. Student's t test and Mann–Whitney U test were used. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 40 pterygoid implants were placed in 20 models. The comparison deviation of the dynamic navigation group and the free-hand group showed a mean (±SD) entry deviation of 0.93 ± 0.46 mm vs. 2.28 ± 1.08 mm (P < 0.001), an exit deviation of 1.37 ± 0.52 mm vs. 3.14 ± 1.82 mm (P < 0.001), and an angle deviation of 2.41 ± 1.24° vs. 10.13 ± 4.68° (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the accuracy with regard to the side factors between the navigation group and the free-hand group. Conclusion The dynamic navigation system has higher accuracy for pterygoid implant placement in a complete edentulous maxilla than the free-hand approach.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Does dynamic navigation assisted student training improve the accuracy of dental implant placement by postgraduate dental students: an in vitro study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04324-4

2024-05-23

BMC Oral Health

Abstract:To assess the accuracy of implant placement in models and satisfaction in dynamic navigation assisted postgraduate dental students training.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years

Xinbo Yu,Baoxin Tao,Feng Wang,Yiqun Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104567

IF: 4.991

2023-08-01

Journal of Dentistry

Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (dCAIS) and compare it with static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) and freehand implant placement (FH) in partially or fully edentulous patients.DATA: Studies that analyzed the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in partially or fully edentulous patients.SOURCES: This meta-analysis included studies published in English and Mandarin Chinese from January 2013 to February 2023 from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure).STUDY SELECTION: Only clinical studies were included. Accuracy was the primary outcome. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,025 implants were analyzed. Meta-regression was conducted to compare the six different navigation systems. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) assessment was adopted as a collective grading of the evidence.CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic navigation is a clinically reliable method for implant placement. Significantly lower angular deviation was observed for dCAIS compared to both sCAIS and FH, while significantly lower global platform and apex deviations were displayed between dCAIS and FH. Overall, dynamic navigation allowed for higher accuracy compared to both sCAIS and FH in a clinical setting; however, additional large sample RCT studies should be conducted, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reported.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review analyzed the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in partially or fully edentulous patients compared with static navigation. The results demonstrated that dynamic navigation could decrease implant placement angular deviations.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study

Xiao-yu Wang,Lin Liu,Miao-sheng Guan,Qian Liu,Tong Zhao,Hong-bo Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104240

IF: 4.991

2022-09-01

Journal of Dentistry

Abstract:Objectives: Infrared dynamic navigation systems can be categorized into active and passive based on whether the surgical instruments can emit or only reflect light. This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of implant placement and the learning curve of both active and passive dynamic navigation systems, using different registration methods.Methods: Implants (n = 704) were placed in 64 sets of models and divided into active (Yizhime, DCARER, Suzhou, China) and passive (Iris-Clinic, EPED, Kaohsiung, China) dynamic navigation groups. Both marker point-based registration (M-PBR) and feature point-based registration (F-PBR) were employed for the two groups. Based on preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography imaging, the coronal, midpoint, apical, and angular deviations were analyzed from 2D and 3D views. The operation time was recorded for each group.Results: The active dynamic navigation group exhibited significantly higher accuracy than the passive dynamic navigation group (angular deviation, 4.13 ± 2.39° versus 4.62 ± 3.32°; coronal global deviation, 1.48 ± 0.60 versus 1.86 ± 1.12 mm; apical global deviation, 1.75 ± 0.81 versus 2.20 ± 1.68 mm, respectively). Significant interaction effects were observed for both registration methods and four quadrants with different dynamic navigation systems. Learning curves for the two dynamic navigation groups approached each other after 12 procedures, and finally converged after 27 procedures.Conclusions: The accuracy of active dynamic navigation system was superior to that of passive dynamic navigation system. Different combinations of dynamic navigation systems, registration methods, and implanted quadrants displayed various interactions.Clinical significance: Our findings could provide guidance for surgeons in choosing an appropriate navigation system in various implant surgeries. Furthermore, the time required by surgeons to master the technique was calculated. Nevertheless, there are certain limitations in this in vitro study, and therefore further research is required.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task‐Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study

Jinyan Chen,Baoxin Tao,Xinbo Yu,Yiqun Wu,Feng Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14373

2024-10-25

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:Objectives To evaluate and compare the accuracy of task‐autonomous robot‐assisted implant surgery (RAIS) and dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (dCAIS) for zygomatic implant placement. Materials and Methods Ten atrophic edentulous maxilla models requiring zygomatic implant (ZI) placement were randomly divided into the RAIS and dCAIS groups. Osteotomies and implant placement were performed under the guidance of a task‐autonomous robotic system or dynamic navigation system. A total of 20 ZIs were analyzed. The angular, coronal, lateral coronal, coronal depth, apical, lateral apical, and apical depth deviations were measured and analyzed between the two groups. The primary outcome parameters were the angular deviations between the planned and the placed ZIs. Data was subjected to descriptive and comparative statistical analysis. The significance of inter‐group differences for continuous variables was assessed with Student's two‐sample t‐tests, Welch two‐sample t‐tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests according to the distribution normality and variance homogeneity. Results ZI placement deviations were compared between the RAIS and dCAIS groups, showing a mean angular deviation of 0.92 ± 0.40° versus 2.03 ± 0.53° (p

engineering, biomedical,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Accuracy of Different Registration Areas Using Active and Passive Dynamic Navigation Systems in Dental Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study.

Bin-Zhang Wu,Fei-Fei Ma,Yan,Feng Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14192

2024-01-01

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:Objectives: To gauge the relative accuracy of the use of passive and active dynamic navigation systems when placing dental implants, and to determine how registration areas affect the performance of these systems.Materials and Methods: Eighty implants were assigned to be placed into 40 total resin mandible models missing either the left or right first molars using either passive or active dynamic navigation system approaches. U-shaped tube registration devices were fixed in the edentulous site for 20 models each on the left or right side. Planned and actual implant positions were superimposed to assess procedural accuracy, and parameters including 3D entry deviation, angular deviation, and 3D apex deviation were evaluated with Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.Results: Respective angular, entry, and apex deviation values of 1.563 +/- 0.977(degrees), 0.725 +/- 0.268 mm, and 0.808 +/- 0.284 mm were calculated for all included implants, with corresponding values of 1.388 +/- 1.090(degrees), 0.789 +/- 0.285 mm, and 0.846 +/- 0.301 mm in the active group and 1.739 +/- 0.826(degrees), 0.661 +/- 0.236 mm, and 0.769 +/- 0.264 mm in the passive group. Only angular deviation differed significantly among groups, and the registration area was not associated with any significant differences among groups.Conclusions: Passive and active dynamic navigation approaches can achieve comparable in vitro accuracy. Registration on one side of the missing single posterior tooth area in the mandible can complete single-tooth implantation on both sides of the posterior teeth, highlighting the promise of further clinical research focused on this topic.
Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Cornelia Edelmann,Martin Wetzel,Anne Knipper,Ralph G. Luthardt,Sigmar Schnutenhaus,Cornelia Edelmann,Martin Wetzel,Anne Knipper,Ralph G. Luthardt,Sigmar Schnutenhaus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091808

IF: 3.9

2021-04-21

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate a possible deviation between the digitally planned implant position and the position achieved using dynamic navigation. The aim of the study was to establish clinical effectiveness and precision of implantation using dynamic navigation. Methods: Twenty consecutive patients received an implant (iSy-Implantat, Camlog, Wimsheim, Germany). One screw implant was placed in one jaw with remaining dentition of at least six teeth. The workflow was fully digital. Digital implant planning was conducted using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an intraoral scan of the actual condition. Twenty implants were subsequently placed using a dynamic computer-assisted procedure. The clinical situation of the implant position was recorded using an intraoral scan. Using these data, models were produced via 3D printing, and CBCTs of these models were made using laboratory analogs. Deviations of the achieved implant position from the planned position were determined using evaluation software. Results: The evaluation of 20 implants resulted in a mean angle deviation of 2.7° (95% CI 2.2–3.3°). The 3D deviation at the implant shoulder was 1.83 mm (95% CI 1.34–2.33 mm). No significant differences were found for any of the parameters between the implantation in the upper or lower jaw and an open or flapless procedure (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical trial showed that sufficiently precise implantation was possible with the dynamic navigation system used here. Dynamic navigation can improve the quality of implant positioning. In particular, the procedure allows safe positioning of the implants in minimally invasive procedures, which usually cannot be performed freehand in this form. A clinical benefit and effectiveness can be determined from the results.

medicine, general & internal
Accuracy of Implant Placement using a Mixed Reality-Based Dynamic Navigation System versus Static Computer-Assisted and Freehand Surgery: an in Vitro Study

Ariel Shusterman,Rizan Nashef,Simona Tecco,Carlo Mangano,Henriette Lerner,Francesco Guido Mangano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105052

IF: 4.991

2024-05-11

Journal of Dentistry

Abstract:Purpose This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of dental implant placement in partially edentulous maxillary models using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation (MR-DN) system to conventional static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) and a freehand (FH) method. Methods Forty-five partially edentulous models (with teeth missing in positions #15, #16 and #25) were assigned to three groups (15 per group). The same experienced operator performed the model surgeries using an MR-DN system (group 1), s-CAIS (group 2) and FH (group 3). In total, 135 dental implants were placed (45 per group). The primary outcomes were the linear coronal deviation (entry error; En), apical deviation (apex error; Ap), XY and Z deviations, and angular deviation (An) between the implants' planned and actual (post-surgery) positions in the models. These deviations were computed as the distances between the stereolithographic (STL) files for the planned implants and placed implants captured with an intraoral scanner. Results Across the three implant sites, the MR-DN system was significantly more accurate than the FH method (in XY, Z, En, Ap and An) and s-CAIS (in Z, Ap and An), respectively. However, S-CAIS was more accurate than MR-DN in XY, and no difference was found between MR-DN and s-CAIS in En. Conclusions Within the limits of this study ( in vitro design, only partially edentulous models), implant placement accuracy with MR-DN was superior to that of FH and similar to that of s-CAIS. Statement of Clinical Relevance In vitro , MR-DN showed greater accuracy in implant positioning than FH, and similar accuracy to s-CAIS: it could, therefore, represent a new option for the surgeon. However, clinical studies are needed to determine the feasibility of MR-DN.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Accuracy and Self-Confidence Level of Freehand Drilling and Dynamic Navigation System of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study

Mathew Mampilly,Leelamma Kuruvilla,Adham Abdulmajeed Tash Niyazi,Arun Shyam,Pallavi Ammu Thomas,Anzil S Ali,Fawaz Pullishery

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49618

2023-11-29

Cureus

Abstract:Background and objective: The impact of the experience of the clinician on learning a new skill or equipment was still an intriguing subject. The goal of this research is to determine the accuracy level of a dynamic navigation system to that of freehand drilling by expert and novice practitioners with varied levels of experience. Additionally, the duration of the surgical procedure and the self-confidence level of the surgeons were also evaluated. Materials and methods: An analog impression of the patient was used to make 20 polyurethane simulation models of the maxilla. Five expert and five inexperienced surgeons prepared the site and placed the implants at random on ten models each. Two different techniques were used to insert dental implants: freehand and dynamic navigation systems. Dental implants were placed in Group 1 utilizing a computer-assisted dynamic navigation device. The implants in Group 2 were secured using free-hand drilling. The dental implants were inserted first in the maxillary right first molar, then in the maxillary right lateral incisor, and the maxillary left second premolar. Preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans were superimposed by employing the Evalunav software and contrasted. The coronal 3-D, apex 3-D, apex vertical depth, and angular deviations for both procedures were evaluated. A pre-tested self-confidence questionnaire was also administered to assess the self-confidence of the practitioners. The duration of the surgical time was also documented for each strategy. The t-test was used to measure the difference in accuracy and confidence levels between freehand and dynamic navigation systems among expert and novice surgeons using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: A total of 60 implants were used (three insertion sites, two methods, and 10 practitioners). Each of the five expert and novice clinicians implanted 15 implants (five models each). Except for entry 3-D, there was a statistically significant difference between the two approaches in all of the primary outcome variables. The apex 3-D (5.89±1.08 mm) and apex vertical (2.08±1.27 mm) dimensions of the dynamic navigation system were significantly smaller than those of the freehand drilling approach (p<005). Dynamic navigation and freehand drilling had angular deviations of 7.16±1.76ᵒ and 9.06±2.18ᵒ, respectively (p=0.0004). The apex vertical deviation was reduced in the navigation technique (2.07±1.5 mm) than in the freehand drilling (2.86±1.4 mm) by experienced practitioners (p=0.04). The difference in time between the two procedures was determined to be statistically highly significant (p<0.001) by both expert and novice surgeons. Furthermore, when contrasting with experienced practitioners, novice practitioners had an overall increase in surgery time (p<0.001) for both approaches. Conclusion: The current in vitro study found that the dynamic navigation system enables more accurate implant placement than the freehand drilling technique, irrespective of the experience of the surgeons. However, this technique appears to benefit novice practitioners more, as they can profoundly minimize their deviations while accomplishing results comparable to those of expert surgeons.
Dynamic navigation vs. static navigation in implant placement: A meta-analysis

Kun Li,Tingting Li,Guangyu Guo,Lei Liu,Zhiyong Jiang,Li Ma,Ying Li,Jun Jia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105395

Abstract:Objective: The precision of implant surgery is pivotal to the success of implant outcomes. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the comparative efficacy of static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) and dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (dCAIS) on the accuracy of implant placement. Methods: A systematic search was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, clinical trial registries, Embase, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu databases for studies comparing sCAIS and dCAIS up to April 16, 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for the quality assessment of included cohort studies (CSs), and Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 (RoB2) were utilized to evaluate the risk of bias of included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 software developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results: A total of 9 studies, comprising 4 RCTs and 5 CSs, were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that dCAIS significantly reduced implant apical deviation (MD=-0.12, 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.02, P = 0.02) and implant depth deviation (MD=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.06, P = 0.004) compared to sCAIS. However, no significant differences were observed in implant platform deviation (MD=-0.01, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.06, P = 0.74) and implant angular deviation (MD=-0.30, 95% CI: -0.78 to 0.18, P = 0.22) between the two techniques. Egger's test results indicated no evidence of publication bias across the analyzed outcomes (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that dCAIS offers superior implant accuracy over sCAIS. Clinical significance: dCAIS may be preferred for use in implant placement. Further high-quality clinical research is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the roles of dCAIS and sCAIS in various types of edentulous conditions, particularly within the context of uniform navigation systems.
Verification of the accuracy of dynamic navigation for conventional and mouthpiece methods: in vivo study

Koudai Nagata,Manabu Okubo,Kurumi Saito,Toshifumi Nakashizu,Mihoko Atsumi,Hiromasa Kawana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04327-1

2024-05-23

BMC Oral Health

Abstract:Dynamic navigation for implant placement is becoming popular under the concept of top-down treatment. The purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for implant placement.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study

Ningbo Geng,Jing Ren,Chi Zhang,Tianren Zhou,Chongjin Feng,Songling Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03947-x

2024-02-09

BMC Oral Health

Abstract:Background: Efficient utilization of residual bone volume and the prevention of inferior alveolar nerve injury are critical considerations in immediate implant placement (IIP) within the posterior mandibular region. Addressing these challenges, this study focuses on the clinical efficacy and implant accuracy of dynamic real-time navigation, an emerging technology designed to enhance precision in implantation procedures. Methods: This study included 84 patients with 130 implants undergoing immediate placement in the posterior mandibular region. Stratified into dynamic navigation, static guide plate, and freehand implant groups, clinical indicators, including initial stability, distance to the inferior alveolar nerve canal, depth of implant placement, and various deviations, were systematically recorded. Statistical analysis, employing 1- or 2-way ANOVA and Student's t-test, allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of each technique. Results: All 130 implants were successfully placed with an average torque of 22.53 ± 5.93 N.cm. In the navigation group, the distance to the inferior alveolar nerve and the depth of implant placement were significantly greater compared to the guide plate and freehand groups (P < 0.05). Implant deviation was significantly smaller in both the navigation and guide plate groups compared to the freehand group(P < 0.05). Additionally, the navigation group exhibited significantly reduced root and angle deviations compared to the guide plate group(P < 0.05), highlighting the superior precision of navigation-assisted immediate implant placement. Conclusions: It is more advantageous to use dynamic navigation rather than a static guide plate and free-hand implant insertion for immediate posterior mandibular implant implantation.
Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study

Hamza Younis,Chengpeng Lv,Boya Xu,Huixia Zhou,Liangzhi Du,Lifan Liao,Ningbo Zhao,Wen Long,Sadam Ahmed Elayah,Xiaofeng Chang,Longlong He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00433-1

2024-05-16

Head & Face Medicine

Abstract:Computer-guided implant surgery has improved the quality of implant treatment by facilitating the placement of implants in a more accurate manner. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of implant placement in a clinical setting using three techniques: dynamic navigation, static surgical guides, and freehand placement. We also investigated potential factors influencing accuracy to provide a comprehensive evaluation of each technique's advantages and disadvantages.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy in Healed and Fresh Extraction Sockets between Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Navigation Systems: A Model-Based Evaluation

Miaozhen Wang,Xiaohui Rausch-Fan,Yalin Zhan,Huidan Shen,Feng Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082806

IF: 3.4

2022-04-11

Materials

Abstract:The aim of this model-base study was to compare the accuracy of implant placement between static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) systems in a fresh extraction socket and healed ridge. A randomized in vitro study was conducted. Twenty 3D-printed maxillary models and 80 implants were used. One experienced researcher placed the implants using either the static navigation or dynamic navigation system. Accuracy was measured by overlaying the real position in the postoperative CBCT on the virtual presurgical placement of the implant in a CBCT image. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the data were performed. In the fresh sockets, the mean deviation was 1.24 ± 0.26 mm (entry point), 1.69 ± 0.34 mm (apical point), and 3.44 ± 1.06° (angle discrepancy) in the static CAIS group, and 0.60 ± 0.29 mm, 0.78 ± 0.33 mm, and 2.47 ± 1.09° in the dynamic CIAS group, respectively. In the healed ridge, the mean deviation was 1.09 ± 0.17 mm and 1.40 ± 0.30 mm, and 2.12 ± 1.11° in the static CAIS group, and 0.80 ± 0.29 mm, 0.98 ± 0.37 mm, and 1.69 ± 0.76° in the dynamic CIAS group, respectively. Compared with the static CAIS system, the dynamic CAIS system resulted in significantly lower entry and apical errors in both fresh sockets and healed ridges. Differences in bone morphology therefore seem to have little effect on accuracy in the dynamic CAIS group.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering

The Use of Dynamic Navigation for the Placement of Zygoma Implants. A Cadaver Study to Compare Accuracy

Dynamic Navigation-Guided Robotic Placement of Zygomatic Implants

Effect of Clinical Experience on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guidance: an in vitro Study

Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study

Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement

The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series

Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

Comparison of the accuracy of dynamic navigation and the free hand approaches in the placement of pterygoid implants in the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study

Does dynamic navigation assisted student training improve the accuracy of dental implant placement by postgraduate dental students: an in vitro study

Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years

The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study

Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task‐Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Different Registration Areas Using Active and Passive Dynamic Navigation Systems in Dental Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study.

Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Accuracy of Implant Placement using a Mixed Reality-Based Dynamic Navigation System versus Static Computer-Assisted and Freehand Surgery: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy and Self-Confidence Level of Freehand Drilling and Dynamic Navigation System of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study

Dynamic navigation vs. static navigation in implant placement: A meta-analysis

Verification of the accuracy of dynamic navigation for conventional and mouthpiece methods: in vivo study

Immediate implant placement in the posterior mandibular region was assisted by dynamic real-time navigation: a retrospective study

Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study

Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy in Healed and Fresh Extraction Sockets between Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Navigation Systems: A Model-Based Evaluation