Abstract:Objective: To evalute the accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants. Methods: Twenty-four patients [9 males and 15 females, mean age was (50.8±14.7) years old], from January 2015 to December 2019, with 96 zygomatic implants placed under a real-time navigation system in Department of Second Dental Center and Department of Oral Implantology of Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were included in the study. The preoperative and the postoperative multislice CT or cone-beam CT were fused to measure and record the entry, exit and angle deviation between the planned and placed implants. The implants were divided into groups according to implant insertion approach (real-time navigation and free-hand), implant length (<47.5 mm and ≥47.5 mm) and implant position (proximal and distal implant). And the differences of implant accuracy were analyzed. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. The implant survival rate was evaluated after 6 months follow-up. A P value<0.05 indicates statistical significance. Results: The mean entry, exit and angle deviation of zygomatic implants were (1.49±0.64) mm, [2.03(1.58, 2.40)] mm and (2.49°±1.12°), respectively. The average entry, exit and angle deviation of the navigation guided implant insertion group were (1.45±0.60) mm, (1.96±0.44) mm and (2.66±1.13°) respectively, while those of the free-hand group were (1.50±0.64) mm, (2.04±0.79) mm and (2.50°±1.13°) respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The average entry, exit and angle deviation of the group with length<47.5 mm were (1.42±0.60) mm, (2.13±0.60) mm and (2.61°±1.08°) respectively and those of the group with length ≥ 47.5 mm were (1.52±0.65) mm, (1.98±0.82) mm and (2.43°±1.14°) respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). In proximal implant group, the average entry, exit and angle deviation were (1.55±0.69) mm, (2.05±0.92) mm and (2.48°±1.16 °) respectively while those of distal implant group were (1.43±0.57) mm, (2.01±0.57) mm and (2.49°±1.10°), respectively. No significant difference was detected between the two groups (P>0.05). All zygomatic implants were placed uneventfully. There were no intra-operative complications, and post-operative reversible complications developed in 3 patients. Two zygomatic implants were lost and the overall zygomatic implant survival rate was 97.9% (94/96) within a follow-up of 6 months. Conclusions: Quad zygomatic implant placement can be achieved with high accuracy and predictable clinical outcome under guidance of a real-time navigation system.

Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement

Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Task‐Autonomous Robotic System or Dynamic Navigation: An In Vitro Study

Effect of a Dynamic Navigation Device on the Accuracy of Implant Placement in the Completely Edentulous Mandible: an in Vitro Study

Dynamic Navigation-Guided Robotic Placement of Zygomatic Implants

Accuracy of Immediate Dental Implant Placement with Task-Autonomous Robotic System and Navigation System: an in Vitro Study

The accuracy of surgical automatic robotic assisted implants placement in edentulous maxilla - an in vitro study

[Accuracy and Clinical Outcome of a Real-Time Surgical Navigation System for the Placement of Quad Zygomatic Implants].

Dynamic Navigation for Prosthetically Driven Zygomatic Implant Placement in Extensive Maxillary Defects: Results of a Prospective Case Series.

Accuracy of zygomatic dental implant placement using computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems compared with a mixed reality appliance. An in vitro study

The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study

Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery

A hybrid robotic system for zygomatic implant placement based on mixed reality navigation

Comparison of the accuracy of dynamic navigation and the free hand approaches in the placement of pterygoid implants in the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study

Effect of Clinical Experience on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guidance: an in vitro Study

Comparison of the Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Dynamic and Augmented Reality-Based Dynamic Navigation: an in Vitro Study

Comparing the Accuracy and Treatment Time of a Robotic and Dynamic Navigation System in Osteotomy and Root-End Resection: an in Vitro Study.

The Use of Dynamic Navigation for the Placement of Zygoma Implants. A Cadaver Study to Compare Accuracy

Accuracy of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants in the severe atrophic maxilla: A pilot clinical study.