Abstract:We consider the pebble game on DAGs with bounded fan-in introduced in [Paterson and Hewitt '70] and the reversible version of this game in [Bennett '89], and study the question of how hard it is to decide exactly or approximately the number of pebbles needed for a given DAG in these games. We prove that the problem of eciding whether $s$~pebbles suffice to reversibly pebble a DAG $G$ is PSPACE-complete, as was previously shown for the standard pebble game in [Gilbert, Lengauer and Tarjan '80]. Via two different graph product constructions we then strengthen these results to establish that both standard and reversible pebbling space are PSPACE-hard to approximate to within any additive constant. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first hardness of approximation results for pebble games in an unrestricted setting (even for polynomial time). Also, since [Chan '13] proved that reversible pebbling is equivalent to the games in [Dymond and Tompa '85] and [Raz and McKenzie '99], our results apply to the Dymond--Tompa and Raz--McKenzie games as well, and from the same paper it follows that resolution depth is PSPACE-hard to determine up to any additive constant. We also obtain a multiplicative logarithmic separation between reversible and standard pebbling space. This improves on the additive logarithmic separation previously known and could plausibly be tight, although we are not able to prove this. We leave as an interesting open problem whether our additive hardness of approximation result could be strengthened to a multiplicative bound if the computational resources are decreased from polynomial space to the more common setting of polynomial time.

A Note on Hardness Frameworks and Computational Complexity of Xiangqi and Janggi

A Note on Computational Complexity of Dou Shou Qi

Hardness of lazy packing and covering

Research on the Computational Complexity of N X N Chinese Chess1

On the complexity of Dark Chinese Chess

The Computational Complexity of Portal and Other 3D Video Games

Backgammon is Hard

A Note on the Computational Complexity of Selfmate and Reflexmate Chess Problems

The Computational Complexity of Angry Birds

JiangJun: Mastering Xiangqi by Tackling Non-Transitivity in Two-Player Zero-Sum Games

NP-Hardness of a 2D, a 2.5D, and a 3D Puzzle Game

Gaming is a hard job, but someone has to do it!

An NP-hard generalization of Nim

Complexity and Algorithms of K-implementation.

Hardness of Approximation in PSPACE and Separation Results for Pebble Games

Hardness of Max-2Lin and Max-3Lin over Integers, Reals, and Large Cyclic Groups

A Note on Computational Complexity of Kill-all Go

Quantum Chess: Developing a Mathematical Framework and Design Methodology for Creating Quantum Games

The Complexity of the Puzzles of Final Fantasy XIII-2

Recent Development in Computational Complexity Characterization of Nash Equilibrium

On the Complexity of Solving Subtraction Games