Abstract:Higher-dimensional sliding puzzles are constructed on the vertices of a $d$-dimensional hypercube, where $2^d-l$ vertices are distinctly coloured. Rings with the same colours are initially set randomly on the vertices of the hypercube. The goal of the puzzle is to move each of the $2^d-l$ rings to pre-defined target vertices on the cube. In this setting, the $k$-rule constraint represents a generalisation of edge collision for the movement of colours between vertices, allowing movement only when a hypercube face of dimension $k$ containing a ring is completely free of other rings. Starting from an initial configuration, what is the minimum number of moves needed to make ring colours match the vertex colours? An algorithm that provides us with such a number is called God's algorithm. When such an algorithm exists, it does not have a polynomial time complexity, at least in the case of the 15-puzzle corresponding to $k=1$ in the cubical puzzle. This paper presents a comprehensive computational study of different scenarios of the higher-dimensional puzzle. A benchmark of three computational techniques, an exact algorithm (the A* search) and two approximately optimal search techniques (an evolutionary algorithm (EA) and reinforcement learning (RL)) is presented in this work. The experiments show that all three methods can successfully solve the puzzle of dimension three for different face dimensions and across various difficulty levels. When the dimension increases, the A* search fails, and RL and EA methods can still provide a generally acceptable solution, i.e. a distribution of a number of moves with a median value of less than $30$. Overall, the EA method consistently requires less computational time, while failing in most cases to minimise the number of moves for the puzzle dimensions $d=4$ and $d=5$.

NP-Hardness of a 2D, a 2.5D, and a 3D Puzzle Game

The Complexity of the Puzzles of Final Fantasy XIII-2

Bejeweled, Candy Crush and other Match-Three Games are (NP-)Hard

Puzzle and Dragons is Hard

The Computational Complexity of Portal and Other 3D Video Games

PSPACE-Hard 2D Super Mario Games: Thirteen Doors

Tetris with Few Piece Types

Design and development a first-person puzzle game based on time-travel game mechanics

Gaming is a hard job, but someone has to do it!

The Complexity of Clickomania

Benchmark Instances and Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Hashiwokakero Puzzle

Number Jigsaw Puzzle: A Mathematical Puzzle Game for Facilitating Players' Problem-Solving Strategies

A Note on Hardness Frameworks and Computational Complexity of Xiangqi and Janggi

Approximately Optimal Search on a Higher-dimensional Sliding Puzzle

On Grid Graph Reachability and Puzzle Games

You Can't Solve These Super Mario Bros. Levels: Undecidable Mario Games

Towards a Model of Puzznic

Snowman is PSPACE-complete.

Ludii and XCSP: Playing and Solving Logic Puzzles

Cube2Pipes : Investigating Hybrid Gameplay Using AR and a Tangible 3D Puzzle

Optimally Solving Colored Generalized Sliding-Tile Puzzles: Complexity and Bounds