Abstract:Background: It is unclear whether an intact buccal bony plate is a prerequisite for immediate implant placement in postextraction sockets. The aim of this 10-year randomized controlled trial was to compare peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters, esthetic ratings of, and patient-reported satisfaction with immediate implant placement in postextraction sockets with buccal bony defects ≥5 mm in the esthetic zone versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation. Methods: Patients presenting a failing tooth in the esthetic region and a buccal bony defect ≥5 mm after an extraction were randomly assigned to immediate (Immediate Group, n = 20) or delayed (Delayed Group, n = 20) implant placement. The second-stage surgery and provisional restoration placement occurred 3 months after implant placement in both groups, followed by definitive restorations 3 months thereafter. During a 10-year follow-up period, marginal bone levels (primary outcome), buccal bone thickness, soft tissue parameters, esthetics, and patient-reported satisfaction were recorded. Results: The mean marginal bone level change was -0.71 ± 0.59 mm and -0.36 ± 0.39 mm in the Immediate Group and the Delayed Group after 10 years (p = 0.063), respectively. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: Marginal bone level changes, buccal bone thickness, clinical outcomes, esthetics, and patients' satisfaction following immediate implant placement, in combination with bone augmentation in postextraction sockets with buccal bony defects ≥5 mm, were not statistically different to those following delayed implant placement after ridge preservation in the esthetic zone. Plain language summary: Immediate implant placement in case of a failing tooth is a favorable treatment option for patients because it considerably shortens treatment time and the number of surgical treatments. The question is if an intact buccal bone wall is necessary for immediate implant placement. A 10-year study was performed in which 20 patients with a failing tooth in the frontal region of the upper jaw were treated with immediate implant placement and were compared with 20 patients in whom a more conventional treatment strategy was followed in which the failing tooth was first removed and the bone gap restored and the implant placed in a second step. After a 10-year follow-up period, it appeared that the bone around the implant was very stable, gums were healthy, and patients were very satisfied with the result. There was no difference between the two treatment procedures. Such results mean that professionals can discuss the procedure with the patient and apply the individual's preference.

Early Clinical Experience With a New One-Piece Implant System in Single Tooth Sites

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Clinical performance and radiographic evaluation of a novel single-piece implant in a private practice over a mean of seventeen months

Long-Term Peri-Implant Health and Papilla Formation at Healed Sites by Chairside Provisionalization of Single-Tooth Implants: A Prospective Case Series

Immediate Implant Placement for a Single Anterior Maxillary Tooth with a Facial Bone Wall Defect: A Prospective Clinical Study with a One-Year Follow-Up Period

Evaluation of Failure in Single-Piece Implant Systems: A One-Year Follow-Up Study

One-Piece Titanium Implants: Retrospective Case Series

Evaluation of Long-Term Stability in Single-Piece Implant Systems: An Original Research

Single tooth restoration in the maxillary esthetic zone using a one-piece ceramic implant with 1 year of follow-up: case series

Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis

Single Crown Restorations Supported by One-Piece Zirconia Dental Implants: Case Series with a Mean Follow-Up of 58 Months

Immediate Insertion and Restoration of a Single Implant to Replace Two Adjacent Periodontally Compromised Lower Incisors: A Technique Report with up-to-8 Years Follow-up

Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research

One-piece versus two-piece zirconia abutment supported single implant crown in the esthetic region: 3-Year results from a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial

Immediate single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10-year randomized controlled trial

Esthetically driven immediate provisionalization in the anterior zone: 5-year results from a prospective study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants

Results at the 1-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Cohort Study with Short, Zirconia Implants

Immediate Loading of Conical Connection Implants: Up-to-2-Year Retrospective Clinical and Radiologic Study

Minimally Invasive Extraction and Immediate Implant Placement with Single-Stage Surgical Procedure:A Clinical Observation of 21 Cases

Immediately versus early placed bone‐level‐tapered implants supporting all‐ceramic crowns on titanium base abutments: 1‐year radiographic and pink esthetic outcomes of a multicenter pilot RCT