Abstract:Purpose: This is a randomized clinical trial to compare the clinical and immunological performance of ultrasmooth versus conventionally-smooth zirconia abutments placed subgingivally after a period of 1 year. Materials and methods: Sixty-two bone level platform-switched implants (NobelParallel CC) were placed epicrestally in the mandibular molar or premolar region in 62 patients. After osseointegration, implants were restored with auto polymerizing acrylic resin crowns and subsequently randomly allocated to two groups according to the type of screw-retained zirconia crown prescribed. The control group received custom zirconia restoration with the subgingival zirconia part conventionally polished, whereas the test group implants were restored with ultra-polished zirconia abutments. Periodontal parameters (PD, PI, and BOP) and marginal bone level changes (MBLC) were recorded for each implant 2 months after insertion (T0), 1 month after final delivery of the crown (T2), and at the 1-year follow-up (T3). Immunological mediators from gingival crevicular fluid (IL-1α, IL-1ra, and TNF-α) were inspected at 1 month after provisional (T1) and accordingly at T2 and T3. Data was analyzed statistically, and significance level was set to α = 0.05. Results: After 1 year, there were no significant changes in PD control-2.18 ± 0.89 mm and test-2.5 ± 0.72 mm (p = 0.073). PD between T2 and T3 dropped significantly in the test group (p = 0.037) and remained stable in the control group. PI was not different in both groups at T0 (p = 0.518) and T2 (p = 0.817). At T3, the test group (0.9 ± 1.01) had a significantly lower PI than the control group (1.55 ± 1.23) (p = 0.035). There was no difference in BOP positive cases between groups after 1 year (control-61.3%, test-51.7%, and p = 0.455). The amount of IL-1ra decreased significantly in the test group (41.75 ± 57.58) (p = 0.001) but not in the control group (59.59 ± 70.43) (p = 0.177). MBLC for the control and test groups after 1 year were 0.68 ± 0.7 and 0.94 ± 0.65 mm (p = 0.061). Conclusions: PD dynamics, PI, BOP, and IL-1ra revealed better outcomes around ultra-polished zirconia abutments than around conventionally polished zirconia abutments.

One-piece versus two-piece zirconia abutment supported single implant crown in the esthetic region: 3-Year results from a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Outcome of Teeth Restored with CAD/CAM Zirconium Dioxide Post-Cores: a Retrospective Study with a Follow-Up Period of 3–6 Years

Clinical and immunological evaluation of peri-implant tissues around ultra-polished and conventionally-polished zirconia abutments. A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial

Findings of a Four-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two-Piece and One-Piece Zirconia Abutments Supporting Single Prosthetic Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Region

A multicenter randomized controlled clinical pilot study of buccally micro-veneered lithium-disilicate and zirconia crowns supported by titanium base abutments: 1-year outcomes

Five-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing single-tooth implant-supported restoration with either zirconia or titanium abutments

Two-piece zirconia implants in the posterior mandible and maxilla: A cohort study with a follow-up period of 9 years

[Comparison of clinical esthetic effects of two abutments of maxillary anterior dental implants with single crown]

Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns

Implant‐supported single all‐ceramic crowns made from prefabricated (stock) or individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: A 5 year randomized clinical trial

A 7.5‐year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw‐retained one‐piece zirconia‐based implant‐supported single crowns

One‐Piece Versus Two‐Piece Abutments for Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Trial

[Effect of Customized Zirconia Abutment on Peri-Implant Tissue: a One-Year Prospective Study].

Clinical evaluation and patient related outcomes of one- and two-piece zirconia implants at five years of loading: A case series study

Zirconia implant abutments supporting single all-ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions: A six-year retrospective study

Clinical performance of implant crowns with customized zirconia abutments: A prospective cohort study with a 4.5- to 8.8-year follow-up

Single Crown Restorations Supported by One-Piece Zirconia Dental Implants: Case Series with a Mean Follow-Up of 58 Months

A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region

Single‐piece zirconia versus single‐piece titanium, narrow‐diameter dental implants in the anterior maxilla: 5‐year post‐loading results of a randomized clinical trial

Clinical Evaluation and Quantitative Occlusal Change Analysis of Posterior Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Crowns: A 3-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.