The impact of indirect benefits (reduced travel time, fuel use and emissions) in cost benefit analysis of road safety countermeasures

Chris Bic Byaruhanga,Harry Evdorides

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2322665

2024-03-07

Traffic Injury Prevention

Abstract:Objective In cost benefit analysis of road safety countermeasures, all relevant effects on safety, travel time and environment have a substantial impact during economic appraisal. However, in the most widely used road safety appraisal tools such as SafetyAnalyst and International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP), indirect effects related to travel time and environment are not considered. Most economic appraisal studies conducted for road safety countermeasures consider only the safety benefits and ignore the indirect benefits due to lack of models to evaluate them. This study attempts to document the quantitative impact of indirect benefits during economic appraisal of road safety infrastructure investments particularly from the angle of reduced crashes.

public, environmental & occupational health,transportation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the importance and impact of considering indirect benefits (such as reduced travel time, fuel consumption, and emissions) in the cost-benefit analysis of road safety measures.

### Research Objectives

The main objective of the paper is to quantitatively assess the impact of indirect benefits in the economic evaluation of road safety infrastructure investments, particularly from the perspective of reducing traffic accidents. Specifically, the study attempts to address the following issues:

1. **Quantifying the impact of indirect benefits**: Quantitatively assess the importance of indirect benefits (such as reduced travel time, fuel consumption, and emissions) in cost-benefit analysis.
2. **Improving economic evaluation**: Improve the economic evaluation process of road safety infrastructure investments by including these indirect benefits.
3. **Increasing the number of implementable measures**: Increase the cost-benefit ratio by considering indirect benefits, thereby potentially increasing the number of safety measures selected for implementation.

### Research Methods

To achieve the above objectives, the authors used a dataset containing a 20-year infrastructure improvement plan and conducted a quantitative study using this dataset. The research methods include:

- **Data sources**: Data from 9 European countries and a 20-year infrastructure improvement plan from the Netherlands.
- **Benefit calculation**: Calculate the benefits from reduced travel time, vehicle operating costs, and emissions based on the reduced number of traffic accidents.
- **Cost-benefit ratio calculation**: Calculate the cost-benefit ratio considering only direct benefits (BCR 1) and the cost-benefit ratio considering both direct and indirect benefits (BCR 2).

### Main Findings

- **The important role of indirect benefits**: The results show that indirect benefits can increase the total benefits by about 7%, significantly improving the cost-effectiveness of the measures.
- **Travel time benefits account for the largest proportion**: Among all indirect benefits, travel time benefits contribute the most, accounting for about 92% of the total indirect benefits.
- **Increase in the number of implementable measures**: Due to the inclusion of indirect benefits, the number of measures meeting specific economic selection criteria (i.e., cost-benefit ratio greater than 4) increased by 5%.

In summary, the study emphasizes the importance of considering indirect benefits in the cost-benefit analysis of road safety measures. These indirect benefits not only significantly increase the total benefits but also increase the number of implementable measures, thereby helping to improve the overall level of road safety.