Abstract:Treatment effect plays an important role on decision making in many fields, such as social marketing, healthcare, and public policy. The key challenge on estimating treatment effect in the wild observational studies is to handle confounding bias induced by imbalance of the confounder distributions between treated and control units. Traditional methods remove confounding bias by re-weighting units with supposedly accurate propensity score estimation under the unconfoundedness assumption. Controlling high-dimensional variables may make the unconfoundedness assumption more plausible, but poses new challenge on accurate propensity score estimation. One strand of recent literature seeks to directly optimize weights to balance confounder distributions, bypassing propensity score estimation. But existing balancing methods fail to do selection and differentiation among the pool of a large number of potential confounders, leading to possible underperformance in many high-dimensional settings. In this article, we propose a data-driven Differentiated Confounder Balancing (DCB) algorithm to jointly select confounders, differentiate weights of confounders and balance confounder distributions for treatment effect estimation in the wild high-dimensional settings. Besides, under some settings with heavy confounding bias, in order to further reduce the bias and variance of estimated treatment effect, we propose a Regression Adjusted Differentiated Confounder Balancing (RA-DCB) algorithm based on our DCB algorithm by incorporating outcome regression adjustment. The synergistic learning algorithms we proposed are more capable of reducing the confounding bias in many observational studies. To validate the effectiveness of our DCB and RA-DCB algorithms, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art methods. By incorporating regression adjustment, our RA-DCB algorithm achieves more precise estimation on treatment effect than DCB algorithm, especially under the settings with heavy confounding bias. Moreover, we show that the top features ranked by our algorithm generate accurate prediction of online advertising effect.

Covariate balancing with measurement error

Mahalanobis balancing: A multivariate perspective on approximate covariate balancing

Kernel-Distance-Based Covariate Balancing

Weighted Euclidean balancing for a matrix exposure in estimating causal effect

Survey calibration for causal inference: a simple method to balance covariate distributions

Efficient Covariate Balancing for the Local Average Treatment Effect

Entropy Balancing is Doubly Robust

Balancing Weights for Causal Inference in Observational Factorial Studies

Energy balancing of covariate distributions

Estimation with Unbalanced Panel Data Having Covariate Measurement Error

Covariate Balancing Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not Adversarially Robust

Evaluation and comparison of covariate balance metrics in studies with time-dependent confounding

A New and Unified Family of Covariate Adaptive Randomization Procedures and Their Properties

Covariate Balancing Sensitivity Analysis for Extrapolating Randomized Trials across Locations

An Empirical Examination of Balancing Strategy for Counterfactual Estimation on Time Series

Trajectory Balancing: A General Reweighting Approach to Causal Inference With Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data

Model-based Bayesian inference under computer assisted balance-improving designs

Bayesian correction for covariate measurement error: a frequentist evaluation and comparison with regression calibration

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Assessing Covariate Balance with Small Sample Sizes

Treatment Effect Estimation Via Differentiated Confounder Balancing and Regression