Abstract:Completely randomized experiments have been the gold standard for drawing causal inference because they can balance all potential confounding on average. However, they may suffer from unbalanced covariates for realized treatment assignments. Rerandomization, a design that rerandomizes the treatment assignment until a prespecified covariate balance criterion is met, has recently got attention due to its easy implementation, improved covariate balance and more efficient inference. Researchers have then suggested to use the treatment assignments that minimize the covariate imbalance, namely the optimally balanced design. This has caused again the long-time controversy between two philosophies for designing experiments: randomization versus optimal and thus almost deterministic designs. Existing literature argued that rerandomization with overly balanced observed covariates can lead to highly imbalanced unobserved covariates, making it vulnerable to model misspecification. On the contrary, rerandomization with properly balanced covariates can provide robust inference for treatment effects while sacrificing some efficiency compared to the ideally optimal design. In this paper, we show it is possible that, by making the covariate imbalance diminishing at a proper rate as the sample size increases, rerandomization can achieve its ideally optimal precision that one can expect with perfectly balanced covariates, while still maintaining its robustness. We further investigate conditions on the number of covariates for achieving the desired optimality. Our results rely on a more delicate asymptotic analysis for rerandomization. The derived theory for rerandomization provides a deeper understanding of its large-sample property and can better guide its practical implementation. Furthermore, it also helps reconcile the controversy between randomized and optimal designs in an asymptotic sense.

Covariate Balancing Sensitivity Analysis for Extrapolating Randomized Trials across Locations

An Optimal Method for Covariate Balancing and Its Properties

Sensitivity analysis for the generalization of experimental results

Efficient Covariate Balancing for the Local Average Treatment Effect

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization

Covariate Balancing Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not Adversarially Robust

Kernel-Distance-Based Covariate Balancing

Sensitivity analysis using bias functions for studies extending inferences from a randomized trial to a target population

Asymptotic Properties of Multi-Treatment Covariate Adaptive Randomization Procedures for Balancing Observed and Unobserved Covariates

A New and Unified Family of Covariate Adaptive Randomization Procedures and Their Properties

Inference on Average Treatment Effect under Minimization and Other Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Methods

Flexible Inference of Optimal Individualized Treatment Strategy in Covariate Adjusted Randomization with Multiple Covariates

Improving transportability of randomized controlled trial inference using robust prediction methods

Leveraging Random Assignment to Impute Missing Covariates in Causal Studies

Regression-based multiple treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Rerandomization with Diminishing Covariate Imbalance and Diverging Number of Covariates

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Covariate balancing with measurement error

Stochastic interventions, sensitivity analysis, and optimal transport