Abstract:Counterfactual estimation from observations represents a critical endeavor in numerous application fields, such as healthcare and finance, with the primary challenge being the mitigation of treatment bias. The balancing strategy aimed at reducing covariate disparities between different treatment groups serves as a universal solution. However, when it comes to the time series data, the effectiveness of balancing strategies remains an open question, with a thorough analysis of the robustness and applicability of balancing strategies still lacking. This paper revisits counterfactual estimation in the temporal setting and provides a brief overview of recent advancements in balancing strategies. More importantly, we conduct a critical empirical examination for the effectiveness of the balancing strategies within the realm of temporal counterfactual estimation in various settings on multiple datasets. Our findings could be of significant interest to researchers and practitioners and call for a reexamination of the balancing strategy in time series settings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: In time - series data, the effectiveness and applicability of balancing strategies in counterfactual estimation have not been fully verified. Specifically, the paper aims to re - examine counterfactual estimation in the time - series environment and evaluate the performance of existing balancing strategies in different settings through empirical research on multiple datasets.
### Background and Problem Description of the Paper
1. **Importance of Counterfactual Estimation**
- Counterfactual estimation is to infer the results if different treatment plans were adopted from the observed data, which is of great significance in many fields such as healthcare and finance.
- For example, in personalized medicine, counterfactual estimation can help better understand patients' responses to different treatments; in e - commerce, it can guide companies when to issue coupons to which users to increase sales.
2. **Main Challenges**
- **Unobservability**: Counterfactual results are essentially not directly observable because each individual can only receive one treatment.
- **Confounding Variables**: Confounding variables affect both treatment and outcome simultaneously, leading to treatment bias and masking the true causal effect.
- **Time - Series Complexity**: In time - series data, the effects of treatment bias and confounding variables are more complex, making counterfactual estimation more challenging.
3. **Existing Solutions and Their Limitations**
- The research community has developed a series of balancing techniques, such as inverse probability weighting (IPTW), stratification, matching, etc., to reduce the covariate differences between treatment groups.
- Although these methods are effective in some cases, their effectiveness and robustness in the time - series environment still need to be further explored.
### Core Problem of the Paper
The paper points out that although balancing strategies show certain effectiveness in static data, in time - series data, the model performs better in counterfactual estimation tasks without using balancing strategies (i.e., empirical risk minimization, ERM), even in the presence of treatment bias. This phenomenon is contrary to the existing understanding, so in - depth research is required.
### Main Research Objectives
1. **Evaluate the Performance of Existing Balancing Strategies in Time - Series**
- Evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of existing balancing strategies in time - series counterfactual estimation through empirical research on multiple datasets.
2. **Analyze the Reasons for the Failure of Balancing Strategies**
- Explore why some balancing strategies fail to improve model performance in time - series and may even lead to performance degradation.
3. **Provide Improvement Suggestions**
- Based on the experimental results, provide suggestions for researchers and practitioners on how to apply balancing strategies in time - series.
### Experimental Design and Results
1. **Experimental Setup**
- Use synthetic datasets, tumor growth simulators, MIMIC - III semi - synthetic datasets, and M5 sales datasets for experiments.
- Compare several state - of - the - art models, including Causal Transformer (CT), Counterfactual Recurrent Network (CRN), Recurrent Marginal Structural Networks (RMSN), G - Net, and Marginal Structural Model (MSM).
2. **Experimental Results**
- Under different treatment bias intensities, the performance of the balancing module (BRM) is not stable, and in the case of high treatment bias, the non - balancing model (ERM) usually performs better.
- The balancing module introduces high variance, making the model unstable when the treatment bias is large.
- In cold - start scenarios (short - term history cold - start and distribution shift cold - start), the balancing module also fails to significantly improve model performance.
### Conclusion
The paper reveals the limitations of existing balancing strategies in time - series counterfactual estimation through empirical research on multiple time - series datasets. The research results show that in the time - series environment, simple balancing strategies may not be the optimal choice, and future research should...