Abstract:Treatment effect plays an important role on decision making in many fields, such as social marketing, healthcare, and public policy. The key challenge on estimating treatment effect in the wild observational studies is to handle confounding bias induced by imbalance of the confounder distributions between treated and control units. Traditional methods remove confounding bias by re-weighting units with supposedly accurate propensity score estimation under the unconfoundedness assumption. Controlling high-dimensional variables may make the unconfoundedness assumption more plausible, but poses new challenge on accurate propensity score estimation. One strand of recent literature seeks to directly optimize weights to balance confounder distributions, bypassing propensity score estimation. But existing balancing methods fail to do selection and differentiation among the pool of a large number of potential confounders, leading to possible underperformance in many high-dimensional settings. In this article, we propose a data-driven Differentiated Confounder Balancing (DCB) algorithm to jointly select confounders, differentiate weights of confounders and balance confounder distributions for treatment effect estimation in the wild high-dimensional settings. Besides, under some settings with heavy confounding bias, in order to further reduce the bias and variance of estimated treatment effect, we propose a Regression Adjusted Differentiated Confounder Balancing (RA-DCB) algorithm based on our DCB algorithm by incorporating outcome regression adjustment. The synergistic learning algorithms we proposed are more capable of reducing the confounding bias in many observational studies. To validate the effectiveness of our DCB and RA-DCB algorithms, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art methods. By incorporating regression adjustment, our RA-DCB algorithm achieves more precise estimation on treatment effect than DCB algorithm, especially under the settings with heavy confounding bias. Moreover, we show that the top features ranked by our algorithm generate accurate prediction of online advertising effect.

End-to-End Balancing for Causal Continuous Treatment-Effect Estimation

Entropy Balancing for Continuous Treatments

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Entropy Balancing is Doubly Robust

Trajectory Balancing: A General Reweighting Approach to Causal Inference With Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data

Efficient Covariate Balancing for the Local Average Treatment Effect

Using Balancing Weights to Target the Treatment Effect on the Treated when Overlap is Poor

Independence weights for causal inference with continuous treatments

Globally Efficient Non-Parametric Inference of Average Treatment Effects by Empirical Balancing Calibration Weighting

Weighted Euclidean balancing for a matrix exposure in estimating causal effect

Large Sample Properties of Entropy Balancing Estimators of Average Causal Effects

High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Treatment Effect Estimation Via Differentiated Confounder Balancing and Regression

A tutorial comparing different covariate balancing methods with an application evaluating the causal effects of substance use treatment programs for adolescents

An Optimal Method for Covariate Balancing and Its Properties

Propensity score weighting for causal inference with multiple treatments

Energy balancing of covariate distributions

Adversarial Balancing-based Representation Learning for Causal Effect Inference with Observational Data

A Unified Framework for Efficient Estimation of General Treatment Models