Good outcome prediction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective multicenter observational study in Korea (the KORHN-PRO registry)

Hyo Jin Bang,Chun Song Youn,Claudio Sandroni,Kyu Nam Park,Byung Kook Lee,Sang Hoon Oh,In Soo Cho,Seung Pill Choi,on behalf of the Korean Hypothermia Network Investigators
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110207
IF: 6.251
2024-04-11
Resuscitation
Abstract:Aim To assess the ability of clinical examination, biomarkers, electrophysiology and brain imaging, individually or in combination to predict good neurological outcomes at 6 months after CA. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of the Korean Hypothermia Network Prospective Registry 1.0, which included adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients (≥18 years). Good outcome predictors were defined as both pupillary light reflex (PLR) and corneal reflex (CR) at admission, Glasgow Coma Scale Motor score (GCS-M) >3 at admission, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) 4 μV, continuous background without discharges on electroencephalogram (EEG), and absence of anoxic injury on brain CT and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Results A total of 1327 subjects were included in the final analysis, and their median age was 59 years; among them, 412 subjects had a good neurological outcome at 6 months. GCS-M >3 at admission had the highest specificity of 96.7% (95% CI 95.3–97.8), and normal brain DWI had the highest sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI 92.9–98.4). When the two predictors were combined, the sensitivities tended to decrease (ranging from 2.7–81.1%), and the specificities tended to increase, ranging from81.3–100%. Through the explorative variation of the 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) prognostication strategy algorithms, good outcomes were predicted, with a specificity of 83.2% and a sensitivity of 83.5% in patients by the algorithm. Conclusions Clinical examination, biomarker, electrophysiology, and brain imaging predicted good outcomes at 6 months after CA. When the two predictors were combined, the specificity further improved. With the 2021 ERC/ESICM guidelines, the number of indeterminate patients and the uncertainty of prognostication can be reduced by using a good outcome prediction algorithm.
emergency medicine,critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?