Abstract:Background: Among cardiac arrest survivors, about half remain comatose 72 h following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Prognostication of poor neurological outcome in this population may result in withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy and death. The objective of this article is to provide recommendations on the reliability of select clinical predictors that serve as the basis of neuroprognostication and provide guidance to clinicians counseling surrogates of comatose cardiac arrest survivors. Methods: A narrative systematic review was completed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Candidate predictors, which included clinical variables and prediction models, were selected based on clinical relevance and the presence of an appropriate body of evidence. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Setting (PICOTS) question was framed as follows: "When counseling surrogates of comatose adult survivors of cardiac arrest, should [predictor, with time of assessment if appropriate] be considered a reliable predictor of poor functional outcome assessed at 3 months or later?" Additional full-text screening criteria were used to exclude small and lower-quality studies. Following construction of the evidence profile and summary of findings, recommendations were based on four GRADE criteria: quality of evidence, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource use. In addition, good practice recommendations addressed essential principles of neuroprognostication that could not be framed in PICOTS format. Results: Eleven candidate clinical variables and three prediction models were selected based on clinical relevance and the presence of an appropriate body of literature. A total of 72 articles met our eligibility criteria to guide recommendations. Good practice recommendations include waiting 72 h following ROSC/rewarming prior to neuroprognostication, avoiding sedation or other confounders, the use of multimodal assessment, and an extended period of observation for awakening in patients with an indeterminate prognosis, if consistent with goals of care. The bilateral absence of pupillary light response > 72 h from ROSC and the bilateral absence of N20 response on somatosensory evoked potential testing were identified as reliable predictors. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain > 48 h from ROSC and electroencephalography > 72 h from ROSC were identified as moderately reliable predictors. Conclusions: These guidelines provide recommendations on the reliability of predictors of poor outcome in the context of counseling surrogates of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest and suggest broad principles of neuroprognostication. Few predictors were considered reliable or moderately reliable based on the available body of evidence.

Prognostic utility of neuroinjury biomarkers in post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient management

Neurologic Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest Using Brain Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Assessment of serum biomarkers and coagulation/fibrinolysis markers for prediction of neurological outcomes of out of cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia

Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Comatose Adult Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

Biomarkers for neuroprognostication after standard versus extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation – A sub-analysis of Prague-OHCA study

Molecular markers of brain damage – clinical and ethical implications with particular focus on cardiac arrest

Abstract 218: Novel Blood Biomarker Taurine and Glutamate for Early Predicting Outcomes after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Elevated serum neurologic biomarker profiles after cardiac arrest in a porcine model

Time course of serum neuron-specific enolase. A predictor of neurological outcome in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest

Identification and Validation of Novel Potential Pathogenesis and Biomarkers to Predict the Neurological Outcome after Cardiac Arrest

Early neuro-prognostication with the Patient State Index and suppression ratio in post-cardiac arrest patients

Good outcome prediction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective multicenter observational study in Korea (the KORHN-PRO registry)

Serum markers of brain injury can predict good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

A Machine Learning-Based Decision Support System for the Prognostication of Neurological Outcomes in Successfully Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

NSE and S100β as serum alarmins in predicting neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest

Improving Outcomes After Post-Cardiac Arrest Brain Injury: A Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

Development of prognostic models for predicting 90-day neurological function and mortality after cardiac arrest

Approaching Brain Injury after Cardiac Arrest: from Bench to Bedside

A Comparison of Prognostic Factors in a Large Cohort of In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

A Physiology-Driven Computational Model for Post-Cardiac Arrest Outcome Prediction

Identification of predictors for neurological outcome after cardiac arrest in peripheral blood mononuclear cells through integrated bioinformatics analysis and machine learning