Combination strategy for prognostication in patients undergoing post-resuscitation care after cardiac arrest

Jung Soo Park,Eun Young Kim,Yeonho You,Jin Hong Min,Wonjoon Jeong,Hong Joon Ahn,Yong Nam In,In Ho Lee,Jae Moon Kim,Changshin Kang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49345-1
IF: 4.6
2023-12-11
Scientific Reports
Abstract:This study investigated the prognostic performance of combination strategies using a multimodal approach in patients treated after cardiac arrest. Prospectively collected registry data were used for this retrospective analysis. Poor outcome was defined as a cerebral performance category of 3–5 at 6 months. Predictors of poor outcome were absence of ocular reflexes (PR/CR) without confounding factors, a highly malignant pattern on the most recent electroencephalography, defined as suppressed background with or without periodic discharges and burst-suppression, high neuron-specific enolase (NSE) after 48 h, and diffuse injury on imaging studies (computed tomography or diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) at 72–96 h. The prognostic performances for poor outcomes were analyzed for sensitivity and specificity. A total of 130 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 68 (52.3%) patients had poor outcomes. The best prognostic performance was observed with the combination of absent PR/CR, high NSE, and diffuse injury on DWI [91.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 80.7–97.1], whereas the combination strategy of all available predictors did not improve prognostic performance (87.8%, 95% CI 73.8–95.9). Combining three of the predictors may improve prognostic performance and be more efficient than adding all tests indiscriminately, given limited medical resources.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?