UK general election: five reasons it matters for science

Jonathan O'Callaghan,Elizabeth Gibney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02110-4

IF: 64.8

2024-06-27

Nature

Abstract:Visa rules, funding and evolving net-zero targets are among scientists' concerns as UK citizens prepare to vote next week. Visa rules, funding and evolving net-zero targets are among scientists' concerns as UK citizens prepare to vote next week.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

As U.K. election nears, major parties reveal their science plans

Holly Else

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr1504

IF: 56.9

2024-06-21

Science

Abstract:All pledge support for research but would restrict immigration, dismaying researchers

multidisciplinary sciences
We can make the UK a science superpower — with a radical political manifesto

Paul Nurse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02025-0

IF: 64.8

2024-06-19

Nature

Abstract:As the election campaign in the United Kingdom marches on, politicians are hardly discussing the country's global standing in science. Here's why that needs to change. As the election campaign in the United Kingdom marches on, politicians are hardly discussing the country's global standing in science. Here's why that needs to change.

multidisciplinary sciences
The US election is monumental for science, say Nature readers — here's why

Jeff Tollefson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03479-y

IF: 64.8

2024-10-30

Nature

Abstract:Poll finds researchers around the world are most worried about climate change and security issues. Poll finds researchers around the world are most worried about climate change and security issues.

multidisciplinary sciences
UK General Election 2017: a Twitter Analysis

Laura Cram,Clare Llewellyn,Robin Hill,Walid Magdy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.02271

2017-06-07

Social and Information Networks

Abstract:This work is produced by researchers at the Neuropolitics Research Lab, School of Social and Political Science and the School of Informatics at the University of Edinburgh. In this report we provide an analysis of the social media posts on the British general election 2017 over the month running up to the vote. We find that pro-Labour sentiment dominates the Twitter conversation around GE2017 and that there is also a disproportionate presence of the Scottish National Party (SNP), given the UK-wide nature of a Westminster election. Substantive issues have featured much less prominently and in a less sustained manner in the Twitter debate than pro and anti leader and political party posts. However, the issue of Brexit has provided a consistent backdrop to the GE2017 conversation and has rarely dropped out of the top three most popular hashtags in the last month. Brexit has been the issue of the GE2017 campaign, eclipsing even the NHS. We found the conversation in the GE2017 Twitter debate to be heavily influenced both by external events and by the top-down introduction of hashtags by broadcast media outlets, often associated with specific programmes and the mediatised political debates. Hashtags like these have a significant impact on the shape of the data collected from Twitter and might distort studies with short data-collection windows but are usually short-lived with little long term impact on the Twitter conversation. If the current polling is to be believed Jeremy Corbyn is unlikely to do as badly as was anticipated when the election was first called. Traditional media sources were slow to pick up on this change in public opinion whereas this trend could be seen early on in social media and throughout the month of May.
Brexit threatens China collaboration

Hong Yang,Roger J. Flower,Xianjin Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/537167c

IF: 64.8

2016-01-01

Nature

Abstract:Brexit — Britain's exit from the European Union — threatens to undermine the country's scientific relationships with nations outside the EU (see E. Masood Nature 535, 467; 2016). The country will need to invest more to maintain its valuable collaboration with China, for example, once EU funding is withdrawn. The United Kingdom could be excluded from exchanges under the EU's Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship programme, which have benefited thousands of talented Chinese and British scientists since 2007. For the country to retain its current exchange level of international research talent, it would need to invest more in its Newton Fund to make up the shortfall (see go.nature.com/2bfgzq3). Also under threat will be British scientists' participation in China's projects with the EU, such as its Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope, due to be completed this year (see W. Yang Nature 534, 467–469; 2016). Despite such uncertainties, Brexit could still provide opportunities to strengthen scientific collaboration between the world's second and fifth largest economies — for example, through the collaboration between Research Councils UK and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (see go.nature.com/2bflysi).
Who voted for a No Deal Brexit? A Composition Model of Great Britains 2019 European Parliamentary Elections

Stephen Clark

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.06548

2020-01-16

Physics and Society

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to use the votes cast at the 2019 European elections held in United Kingdom to re-visit the analysis conducted subsequent to its 2016 European Union referendum vote. This exercise provides a staging post on public opinion as the United Kingdom moves to leave the European Union during 2020. A composition data analysis in a seemingly unrelated regression framework is adopted that respects the compositional nature of the vote outcome; each outcome is a share that adds up to 100% and each outcome is related to the alternatives. Contemporary explanatory data for each counting area is sourced from the themes of socio-demographics, employment, life satisfaction and place. The study find that there are still strong and stark divisions in the United Kingdom, defined by age, qualifications, employment and place. The use of a compositional analysis approach produces challenges in regards to the interpretation of these models, but marginal plots are seen to aid the interpretation somewhat.
'It can feel like there's no way out' — political scientists face pushback on their work

Dyani Lewis,Alison Abbott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02026-z

IF: 64.8

2024-06-20

Nature

Abstract:In a year in which numerous countries are going to the polls, many election-watching scientists are under pressure. In a year in which numerous countries are going to the polls, many election-watching scientists are under pressure.

multidisciplinary sciences
2024 looms

H Holden Thorp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn5404

IF: 56.9

2023-12-22

Science

Abstract:Last week, Science reflected on major achievements in science in 2023, from weight loss drugs and a malaria vaccine to exascale computing and advances in artificial intelligence. These are all impressive developments and provide yet more testimony to the power of science to continually expand the quality of our lives while deepening our understanding of the world. Even so, it's hard to end the year without some worries about 2024. Wars in Ukraine and Gaza will grind on in the new year, and the United States is headed toward perhaps the most consequential and divisive presidential election in more than 160 years. These events-and similar ones around the world-will challenge the cohesiveness and determination of the scientific community as never before.
Assessing the potential impact on health of the UK's future relationship agreement with the EU: analysis of the negotiating positions

Nick Fahy,Tamara Hervey,Mark Dayan,Mark Flear,Mike Galsworthy,Scott Greer,Holly Jarman,Martin McKee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133120000171

Abstract:While policy attention is understandably diverted to COVID-19, the end of the UK's post-Brexit 'transition period' remains 31 December 2020. All forms of future EU-UK relationship are worse for health than EU membership, but analysis of the negotiating texts shows some forms are better than others. The likely outcomes involve major negative effects for NHS staffing, funding for health and social care, and capital financing for the NHS; and for UK global leadership and influence. We expect minor negative effects for cross border healthcare (except in Northern Ireland); research collaboration; and data sharing, such as the Early Warning and Response System for health threats. Despite political narratives, the legal texts show that the UK seeks de facto continuity in selected key areas for pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and equipment [including personal protective equipment (PPE)], especially clinical trials, pharmacovigilance, and batch-testing. The UK will be excluded from economies of scale of EU membership, e.g. joint procurement programmes as used recently for PPE. Above all, there is a major risk of reaching an agreement with significant adverse effects for health, without meaningful oversight by or input from the UK Parliament, or other health policy stakeholders.
How five crucial elections in 2024 could shape climate action for decades

Smriti Mallapaty,Jeff Tollefson,Carissa Wong,Sarah Wild,Nisha Gaind

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00642-3

IF: 64.8

2024-03-06

Nature

Abstract:Some of the world's biggest carbon emitters are going to the polls this year — the results could determine whether humanity can correct its trajectory of dangerous global warming. Some of the world's biggest carbon emitters are going to the polls this year — the results could determine whether humanity can correct its trajectory of dangerous global warming.

multidisciplinary sciences
Scientists fear tough UK immigration rules will deter talent

Katharine Sanderson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00123-7

IF: 64.8

2024-01-18

Nature

Abstract:Cost increases and restrictions on visa-holders bringing family members will put off researchers, warn scientists. Cost increases and restrictions on visa-holders bringing family members will put off researchers, warn scientists.

multidisciplinary sciences
'Stop the xenophobia' — South African researchers sound alarm on eve of election

Sarah Wild

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01547-x

IF: 64.8

2024-05-29

Nature

Abstract:South Africa's scientists want the next government to halt declining funding and urge universities to do more to protect international researchers from attacks. South Africa's scientists want the next government to halt declining funding and urge universities to do more to protect international researchers from attacks.

multidisciplinary sciences
Addressing the political determinants of health

Mavin Kashyap

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp24x738921

2024-07-26

British Journal of General Practice

Abstract:'Medicine is a social science, and politics nothing but medicine at a larger scale.' 1 The stage for a general election in the UK has been set for 4 July, yet the (political) fireworks will have been let off well beforehand. Among the heart of the upcoming debates will be health care, encompassing such topics as the waiting-list backlog and industrial action. This will now be against the backdrop of the threat of mass resignation by GPs following the UK local medical committee conference,2 which already lies in direct contrast with the pledge made by the Liberal Democrats to recruit 8000 more GPs if elected, as a central part of their election campaign.3 These headlines act as a stark reminder that health is a political choice and that politics determine the health status of a nation; a position made ...

primary health care,medicine, general & internal
UK Scientists Would Lose Money and Influence under “brexit,” Says Lords Report

Nigel Hawkes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2274

2016-01-01

BMJ

Abstract:Leaving the European Union would cost UK scientists money and influence, says a report by the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee.1Research funding is one of the few areas where the United Kingdom gains more money than it spends. Of the country’s gross contribution to the EU, £5.4bn (€6.84bn; $7.77bn) can be attributed to the community’s research, development, and innovation activities. But the UK gets back £8.8bn in research grants, so exiting the EU would in theory leave a gap of £3.4bn to be filled.When total contributions and receipts are counted, the UK is a net loser, contributing £77.7bn a year and getting £47.5bn back. Leaving the EU would therefore save the UK £30.2bn a year, some of which could be …
Daily briefing: Global trust in scientists is high

Katrina Krämer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00496-9

IF: 64.8

2024-02-14

Nature

Abstract:A survey of more than 71,000 people in 67 countries finds that people trust scientists and believe they should play a bigger role in policy making. Plus, a private Moon landing could finally happen.

multidisciplinary sciences
Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership

Chris Dawson,Paul L Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289312

IF: 3.7

2023-11-22

PLoS ONE

Abstract:On June 23rd 2016 the UK voted to leave the European Union. The period leading up to the referendum was characterized by a significant volume of misinformation and disinformation. Existing literature has established the importance of cognitive ability in processing and discounting (mis/dis) information in decision making. We use a dataset of couples within households from a nationally representative UK survey to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability and the propensity to vote Leave / Remain in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership. We find that a one standard deviation increase in cognitive ability, all else being equal, increases the likelihood of a Remain vote by 9.7%. Similarly, we find that an increase in partner's cognitive ability further increases the respondent's likelihood of a Remain vote (7.6%). In a final test, restricting our analysis to couples who voted in a conflicting manner, we find that having a cognitive ability advantage over one's partner increases the likelihood of voting Remain (10.9%). An important question then becomes how to improve individual and household decision making in the face of increasing amounts of (mis/dis) information.
Voting Patterns, Mortality, and Health Inequalities in England

Philip Clarke,Charles Rahal,Josh Knight,Veline L' Esperance,Melinda C Mills

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.26.24309517

2024-06-26

Abstract:Objectives: To replicate an analysis conducted just prior to the 1997 UK General Election on the relationship between voting patterns at the constituency level, correlations between voting patterns, measured inequality, and premature mortality. Design: Observational study using data from the Office of National Statistics. Setting: England, UK. Participants: The health and mortality co-variates come from the English population across multiple publicly available datasets from the Office of National Statistics and are cross-tabulated against members of the public who voted in the 2019 UK General Election in constituencies in England. Main Outcome Measures: Age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) for premature deaths for 2021, Health Deprivation and Disability (HDD) and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) for 2019, Slope Indices of Inequality (2001-20), Healthy Life Expectancy (2011-20). Results: When observing the proportion of the eligible vote for Labour at the constituency level, there was a strong correlation with higher ASMR in both males (r=0.707, p<0.0001) and females (r=0.6505, p<0.0001). There is a strong correlation between Labour vote share ranks and deprivation, with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of 𝜌=-0.687 (p<0.0001) for deprivation as measured by the HDD and 𝜌=-0.695 (p<0.0001) for the IMD ranks. Slope indices of inequality (SII) remain high for males and are increasing for females. Healthy life expectancies remain stratified, and differentials across deprivation remain wide and unchanged. Conclusions: Health inequalities across constituencies and socio-economic indicators such as IMD remain high. New approaches are likely to be required to reduce inequalities in the UK. Trial Registration: N/A.
UK political parties pledge to strengthen security—yet ignore health security

Kent Buse,Martin McKee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1359

2024-06-21

BMJ

Abstract:Use of repetition as a debating device has characterised the 2024 general election campaign in the UK. The same questions are asked, and the same answers are given. At some point in most recent debates, a Conservative candidate will be asked why the British economy has performed so badly and they will inevitably blame the covid-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Similarly, a question about NHS performance, perhaps asking why waiting lists are increasing, will also be attributed to the pandemic. Questions about trust in politicians will, almost certainly make reference to "partygate," which led to current and former prime ministers Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson being fined for breaches of public health rules.1 In these and other ways, the pandemic has cast a long shadow over this election.In these circumstances we might expect that the parties would have something to say in their manifestos about how to...

medicine, general & internal
Uk Must Not Relax Rules on Animal Studies to Harmonise with Europe, Scientists Say

Nigel Hawkes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1106

2012-01-01

British Medical Journal

Abstract:UK legislation on the use of animals in research should not be watered down to harmonise with the EU Animals Directive, scientists and research charities have urged. The Home Office will shortly announce its plans for bringing UK law into line with the directive, which sets standards that in many respects are less demanding than those already enforced in the United Kingdom. Animal welfare charities such as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) have warned that although the directive will raise standards in other parts of the EU it must not be allowed to lower those in the UK. Differences include a lower level of inspections than is presently the case in the UK and smaller cage sizes. But the directive …
Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis

Kason Ka Ching Cheung,Ho-Yin Chan,Sibel Erduran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01771-2

Abstract:News media plays a vital role in communicating scientific evidence to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such communication is important for convincing the public to follow social distancing guidelines and to respond to health campaigns such as vaccination programmes. However, newspapers were criticised that they focus on the socio-political perspective of science, without explaining the nature of scientific works behind the government's decisions. This paper examines the connections of the nature of science categories in the COVID-19 era by four local newspapers in the United Kingdom between November 2021 to February 2022. Nature of science refers to different aspects of how science works such as aims, values, methods and social institutions of science. Considering the news media may mediate public information and perception of scientific stories, it is relevant to ask how the various British newspapers covered aspects of science during the pandemic. In the period explored, Omicron variant was initially a variant of concern, and an increasing number of scientific evidence showed that the less severity of this variant might move the country from pandemic to endemic. We explored how news articles communicate public health information by addressing how science works during the period when Omicron variants surge. A novel discourse analysis approach, epistemic network analysis is used to characterise the frequency of connections of categories of the nature of science. The connection between political factors and the professional activities of scientists, as well as that with scientific practices are more apparent in left-populated and centralist outlets than in right-populated news outlets. Among four news outlets across the political spectrum, a left-populated newspaper, the Guardian, is not consistent in representing relations of different aspects of the nature of scientific works across different stages of the public health crisis. Inconsistency of addressing aspects of scientific works and a downplay of the cognitive-epistemic nature of scientific works likely lead to failure in trust and consumption of scientific knowledge by the public in the healthcare crisis.

UK general election: five reasons it matters for science

As U.K. election nears, major parties reveal their science plans

We can make the UK a science superpower — with a radical political manifesto

The US election is monumental for science, say Nature readers — here's why

UK General Election 2017: a Twitter Analysis

Brexit threatens China collaboration

Who voted for a No Deal Brexit? A Composition Model of Great Britains 2019 European Parliamentary Elections

'It can feel like there's no way out' — political scientists face pushback on their work

2024 looms

Assessing the potential impact on health of the UK's future relationship agreement with the EU: analysis of the negotiating positions

How five crucial elections in 2024 could shape climate action for decades

Scientists fear tough UK immigration rules will deter talent

'Stop the xenophobia' — South African researchers sound alarm on eve of election

Addressing the political determinants of health

UK Scientists Would Lose Money and Influence under “brexit,” Says Lords Report

Daily briefing: Global trust in scientists is high

Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership

Voting Patterns, Mortality, and Health Inequalities in England

UK political parties pledge to strengthen security—yet ignore health security

Uk Must Not Relax Rules on Animal Studies to Harmonise with Europe, Scientists Say

Communicating science in the COVID-19 news in the UK during Omicron waves: exploring representations of nature of science with epistemic network analysis