Abstract:Background: The UK government's reckless and incompetent response to Covid-19 has produced an outcome which is amongst the worst in the world, and arguably the worst in terms of deaths per 100,000 population of major countries (especially when one measures mortality from Covid in terms of cause of death on the death certificate, rather than the UK government's own measure-death of a tested individual within 28 days of testing). This article updates my initial analysis in this journal over a year ago, and traces the negligent and shambolic policy-making, and supine official scientific advice, which has led to such a dismal outcome. Methods: It does so by examining the policies and approach of the UK government from the begining of the pandemic (in UK terms, January 2020) up to June 2021. All relevant declarations, speeches, decisions, public interviews and policies were noted on a daily basis, examined and critically assessed-along with daily data and information over the whole period on Covid's threat to, and spread across, the UK. Conclusions: On three successive occasions, Boris Johnson and his compliant Ministers acted too late and too weakly to prevent avoidable death and illness. At the time of writing the vaccination programme in the UK has been destabilised by the government-yet again-having failed to secure its borders, this time against the Delta variant (Indian mutation) of the virus. Overall, in terms of border control, quarantine, testing, tracing, isolation and timely and enforced lockdown, the government put short-term, superficial considerations above coherent strategy. It dressed up its incompetence as a superficial libertarianism and defence of the economy, but thereby managed to achieve the worst of all worlds in terms of three egregious failures-appalling health outcomes; (ironically) worse economic damage than countries which took draconian action; and (also ironically) continually recurring restrictions as a result of earlier failure to take strong action to suppress Covid and keep it at bay. Public reaction in England (unlike in Scotland and Wales) to the Johnson government's shenanigans has not been commensurate with that government's level of failure, which sadly reflects a debasement of the political culture in England.

UK political parties pledge to strengthen security—yet ignore health security

Unpicking the general election manifestos on health and care

Rammya Mathew: We need braver politics for better health

Manifesto health pledges from main parties are "unfunded commitments," says IFS

Addressing the political determinants of health

The health costs of political failure

How should the new government rebuild the UK's reputation in global health?

As U.K. election nears, major parties reveal their science plans

UK's evolving role in global health

Britain's COVID-19 battle: The role of political leaders in shaping the responses to the pandemic

Public health is in crisis, but it can be fixed

Labour vows to "fix NHS again" after Tories leave it "broken"

Embedded Liberalism and Health Populism in the UK in a Post-Truth Era

The response to Covid-19 in England: political accountability and loss of trust

'We did everything we could': An account of toxic leadership

MP Twitter Engagement and Abuse Post-first COVID-19 Lockdown in the UK: White Paper

Online Abuse toward Candidates during the UK General Election 2019: Working Paper

UK General Election 2017: a Twitter Analysis

We can make the UK a science superpower — with a radical political manifesto

Political Parties and Their Leaders’ Public Perception against Background of Current Psychological State of Russian Society

Lib Dems launch "manifesto to save NHS" with pledges on GP access and cancer