Abstract:We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen, (i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment, experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the Measurement Problem.

SU(2) Relativity and the EPR Paradox

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality

Spin-1 photons, spin-1/2 electrons, Bell's inequalities, and Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics

Seventy Years of the EPR Paradox

On some EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) issues

Causality and relativity in quantum physics

On Wavefunction Collapse, the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory

EPR Paradox and Magician's Props

Measures and metrics in uniform gravitational fields

Irreversible Diagonalization of Mechanical Quantities and the EPR Paradox

Angular Epr Paradox

An Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument based on weak forms of local realism not falsifiable by GHZ or Bell experiments

Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space

Towards an Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox Between Two Macroscopic Atomic Ensembles at Room Temperature

On EPR Paradox, No Entanglement Theorem for Separate Particles and Consequences

Discrete Symmetry in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Does Bell's theorem apply if perceived pseudo-Euclidean space is emergent?

Relativistic two-particle problem in the Lagrange formalism

Uncertainty relations for the realisation of macroscopic quantum superpositions and EPR paradoxes

Backward Causation and the EPR Paradox