Causality and relativity in quantum physics

Johan F. Prins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0607209
2006-07-24
Abstract:It is argued here that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics violates the tenets on which both Galileo's and Einstein's theories of relativity are based. It is postulated that the "building blocks" of the universe are not "particles" but are holistic wave-entitities which act and interact with other wave-entities as one would expect from waves. A new approach to model the free electron is presented. It is argued from Coulomb's law that the electromagnetic quantum-field energy is not part of an electric field surrounding the electron, but is localised, so that it is wholly equal to the mass of the electron. It is found that an energy component must also exist along a fourth spatial dimension which could be the origin of the "dark energy" in the universe and which, in turn, should be responsible for "vacuum-fluctuations" as governed by Heisenberg's uncertainty relationship for energy and time. The possible consequences of this approach are analysed and discussed.
General Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are whether the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics violates the basic principles of relativity, and how to re - interpret quantum phenomena without violating causality and relativity. Specifically: 1. **Conflict between the Copenhagen interpretation and relativity**: - The paper points out that the probability wave function and the uncertainty principle (such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle) in the Copenhagen interpretation conflict with Galileo's and Einstein's relativity theories. In particular, the Copenhagen interpretation holds that the position and momentum of a quantum particle cannot be precisely measured simultaneously, which contradicts the equivalence of inertial reference frames in relativity. 2. **Basic building blocks of the universe**: - The author proposes that the basic building blocks of the universe are not particles, but holistic wave - entities. These wave - entities can change their shapes and spatial extents and can be superimposed in the same spatial region. 3. **Two forms of superposition**: - The author defines two different ways of superposition: - **Enmeshment**: When wave - entities are superimposed, they still maintain their respective independence, allowing interactions between their sub - components. - **Entanglement**: Wave - entities completely lose their respective independence and form a new single - whole wave - entity. 4. **Interface between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics**: - The author derives a parameter to define the interface between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. Both are valid in their respective fields but do not include each other. 5. **Causality explanation**: - Based on the above framework, the author proposes a possible causality explanation, which makes the phenomena of quantum mechanics visually understandable, and even "spooky action at a distance" can be logically explained. 6. **New approach to the electron model**: - The author suggests a new method for quantum - mechanically modeling electrons and other elementary particles. For example, the electromagnetic quantum energy of an electron does not form a field in three - dimensional space around the electron, but is finite and localized, equal to the mass of the electron. 7. **Dark energy and vacuum energy fluctuations**: - The author also derives the energy component of the electron along the fourth dimension, which may be part of the dark energy in the universe and causes vacuum energy fluctuations through Heisenberg's uncertainty relation. In summary, this paper aims to re - examine and solve the conflict between quantum mechanics and relativity by introducing new concepts and an explanatory framework, thereby providing a quantum - mechanical interpretation that is more in line with the principles of causality and relativity.