Abstract:We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen, (i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment, experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the Measurement Problem.

Seventy Years of the EPR Paradox

EPR Paradox,Locality and Completeness of Quantum Theory

On some EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) issues

Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered incomplete?

The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality

Towards an Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox Between Two Macroscopic Atomic Ensembles at Room Temperature

On EPR Paradox, No Entanglement Theorem for Separate Particles and Consequences

Quantum Probabilities and Paradoxes of the Quantum Century

EPR Paradox and Magician's Props

On Wavefunction Collapse, the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory

An Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument based on weak forms of local realism not falsifiable by GHZ or Bell experiments

The basic paradoxes of statistical classical physics and the quantum mechanics

The EPR Paradox Implies A Minimum Achievable Temperature

SU(2) Relativity and the EPR Paradox

From Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox to Quantum Nonlocality: Experimental Investigation of Quantum Correlations

Irreversible Diagonalization of Mechanical Quantities and the EPR Paradox

What information theory can tell us about quantum reality

Thinking twice inside the box: is Wigner's friend really quantum?

A Modest View of the Black Hole Information Paradox

Quantum magic: A skeptical perspective

Why Bohr was wrong in his response to EPR