Abstract:It is well-established in the literature that biases (e. g., related to body size, ethnicity, race etc.) can occur during the employment interview and that applicants' fairness perceptions related to selection procedures can influence attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward the recruiting organization. This study explores how social robotics may affect this situation. Using an online, video vignette-based experimental survey (n = 235), the study examines applicant fairness perceptions of two types of job interviews: a face-to-face and a robot-mediated interview. To reduce the risk of socially desirable responses, desensitize the topic, and detect any inconsistencies in the respondents' reactions to vignette scenarios, the study employs a first-person and a third-person perspective. In the robot-mediated interview, two teleoperated robots are used as fair proxies for the applicant and the interviewer, thus providing symmetrical visual anonymity unlike prior research that relied on asymmetrical anonymity, in which only one party was anonymized. This design is intended to eliminate visual cues that typically cause implicit biases and discrimination of applicants, but also to prevent biasing the interviewer's assessment through impression management tactics typically used by applicants. We hypothesize that fairness perception (i.e., procedural fairness and interactional fairness) and behavioral intentions (i.e., intentions of job acceptance, reapplication intentions, and recommendation intentions) will be higher in a robot-mediated job interview than in a face-to-face job interview, and that this effect will be stronger for introvert applicants. The study shows, contrary to our expectations, that the face-to-face interview is perceived as fairer, and that the applicant's personality (introvert vs. extravert) does not affect this perception. We discuss this finding and its implications, and address avenues for future research.

MAG-BERT-ARL for Fair Automated Video Interview Assessment

Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment

Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-Based Recruitment

Integrating Psychometrics and Computing Perspectives on Bias and Fairness in Affective Computing: A Case Study of Automated Video Interviews

Grading video interviews with fairness considerations

Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments

Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey

Small but Fair! Fairness for Multimodal Human-Human and Robot-Human Mental Wellbeing Coaching

DeAR: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Additive Residuals

Don't Judge Me by My Face : An Indirect Adversarial Approach to Remove Sensitive Information From Multimodal Neural Representation in Asynchronous Job Video Interviews

Fairness And Performance In Harmony: Data Debiasing Is All You Need

FairCVtest Demo: Understanding Bias in Multimodal Learning with a Testbed in Fair Automatic Recruitment

Fairness in AI-Driven Recruitment: Challenges, Metrics, Methods, and Future Directions

Fairness and Bias in Robot Learning

BiasEye: A Bias-Aware Real-time Interactive Material Screening System for Impartial Candidate Assessment

AI Gender Bias, Disparities, and Fairness: Does Training Data Matter?

FairLENS: Assessing Fairness in Law Enforcement Speech Recognition

Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Dataset

Fairness-Sensitive Policy-Gradient Reinforcement Learning for Reducing Bias in Robotic Assistance

Mitigation of gender bias in automatic facial non-verbal behaviors generation