Abstract:The presence of decision-making algorithms in society is rapidly increasing nowadays, while concerns about their transparency and the possibility of these algorithms becoming new sources of discrimination are arising. There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. All these four Human-Centric requirements are closely related to each other. With the aim of studying how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data, we propose a fictitious case study focused on automated recruitment: FairCVtest. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles including image, text, and structured data, which are consciously scored with gender and racial biases. FairCVtest shows the capacity of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) behind automatic recruitment tools built this way (a common practice in many other application scenarios beyond recruitment) to extract sensitive information from unstructured data and exploit it in combination to data biases in undesirable (unfair) ways. We present an overview of recent works developing techniques capable of removing sensitive information and biases from the decision-making process of deep learning architectures, as well as commonly used databases for fairness research in AI. We demonstrate how learning approaches developed to guarantee privacy in latent spaces can lead to unbiased and fair automatic decision-making process. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.

Small but Fair! Fairness for Multimodal Human-Human and Robot-Human Mental Wellbeing Coaching

Multimodal Gender Fairness in Depression Prediction: Insights on Data from the USA & China

Fairness and Bias in Robot Learning

Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-Based Recruitment

Fairness and Bias in Multimodal AI: A Survey

Fairness And Performance In Harmony: Data Debiasing Is All You Need

Towards Fair and Explainable AI using a Human-Centered AI Approach

Rolling in the deep of cognitive and AI biases

Potential Ways to Detect Unfairness in HRI and to Re-establish Positive Group Dynamics

Dynamic Fairness Perceptions in Human-Robot Interaction

FairerML: An Extensible Platform for Analysing, Visualising, and Mitigating Biases in Machine Learning

Towards Fair Affective Robotics: Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognition

Bridging the Gap: Protocol Towards Fair and Consistent Affect Analysis

Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments

Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?

A novel approach for assessing fairness in deployed machine learning algorithms

Whither Bias Goes, I Will Go: An Integrative, Systematic Review of Algorithmic Bias Mitigation

Democratize with Care: The need for fairness specific features in user-interface based open source AutoML tools

Can Fairness be Automated? Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoML

Joint Optimization of AI Fairness and Utility: A Human-Centered Approach