Abstract:Language Teaching Research, Ahead of Print. Virtually all researchers understand the requirement of presenting their studies in peer-reviewed English-medium journals. Russian scientific writers understand this necessity too; however, evidence suggests that these particular researchers are under-performing relative to similar non-native English speakers. The considerable challenge Russians face centers on articulating their ideas in English in the way that meets the norms and expectations of their international discourse community. That is, their writing is characterized as wordy, cumbersome, too academese, and syntactically complex. These issues need to be addressed in the early stages of developing writing skills. In this study, we address discourse differences between the scientific writing of Russian engineering students and that of international experts. Using the computational linguistics tools Coh-Metrix and Gramulator, we compare a corpus of students' manuscripts with a similar corpus of experts' published papers. We focused on six conceptual categories: readability, writing quality, cohesion, syntax, word choice, and genre purity. The overall results suggest that student writing differs significantly for multiple characteristics of text and discourse. A discriminant analysis provided a model that successfully predicts group membership and helps identify the most important issues in Russian student writing. Measures such as noun phrase density, genre purity, word age of acquisition, and variance in sentence length were found to be significant positive predictors of Russian student writing, whereas lexical diversity, adversative/contrastive connectives, adverbial phrase density, and word concreteness were significant positive predictors of expert writing. Our analysis allowed us to provide guidance for instructors, materials designers, as well as for technological assessment tools.

The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse

Cooperating with Grice: a cross-disciplinary metaperspective on uses of Grice's cooperative principle

Cooperative Principle and Inferential Chains of Interpretation: Socio-Pragmatic Approach to Language and Literature Teaching

An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines

Linguistic Basis of Humor in Uses of Grice’s Cooperative Principle

Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts

Examining Various Interpretations of Grice's Cooperative Principle

Interactional Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics Research Article Abstracts of Moroccan L2 Writers of English: A Small Corpus Investigation

Non-cooperation in communication: A reassessment of Gricean pragmatics

An Application of Grice’s Cooperative Principle to the Analysis of a Written Business Negotiation Model

Theoretical and analytical framework of cooperative research: A review

Representation of interactional metadiscourse in translated and native English: A corpus-assisted study

Exploring Studies on Cooperative Principle in English Language Teaching: A Literature Review

A Literature Review on Cooperative Principle

An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse in international mathematical contest papers: From research to EAP practice

The Principles Underlying What is Communicated and not Said: A Cursory Discussion of Grice’s Cooperative Principle and its Maxims

Tailoring inference-rich descriptions through making compromises between conflicting cooperation principles

Linguistic Analysis Using the Gricean Cooperative Principle on a Television Interview

Study of Cooperative Principle to achieve Conversational Implicature

Addressing discourse differences in the writing of Russian engineering students and international researchers

A functional analysis of lexical bundles in the discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles: A cross-paradigm study