Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts

Wenjuan Qin,Paola Uccelli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.004

IF: 1.86

2019-01-01

Journal of Pragmatics

Abstract:Writers interact with readers using explicit signals of textual organization (e.g., firstly; however) and stance (e.g., possibly, surprisingly), known as metadiscourse markers (MDMs). Most metadiscourse studies, however, focus on academic writing exclusively, with minimal efforts comparing MDMs usage across communicative contexts. The present study examines English-as-Foreign-Language (EFL) learners’ use of MDMs in academic and colloquial writing. Each participant produced two texts on the same topic: a personal email to a close friend (colloquial) and an academic report to school principals (academic). The corpus of 704 texts were coded using Hyland’s metadiscourse model (2005). Trained EFL teachers scored texts for overall writing quality. The study first presented a distributional map of MDMs used in the EFL academic and colloquial writing corpora. Then, multi-level models revealed both similarities and differences in the use of MDM subtypes to serve distinct communicative purposes (e.g., more code glosses in academic writing; more boosters and engagement markers in colloquial writing). Finally, the use of MDMs was analyzed in relation to overall writing quality within and across communicative contexts. The results highlighted the strengths and weaknesses in EFL learners’ use of MDMs and informed the design of pedagogical approach attuned to the pragmatic functions of MDMs.