Abstract:To quantitatively compare the aperture-based and beamlet-based inverse planning techniques and draw conclusion with regard to the dependence of plan quality on the number of segments of the incident fields using three clinical cases of different disease sites. We developed a combined aperture based inverse planning algorithm. After the number of segments was specified, the beam eyes views (BEVs) are applied to delineate the maximum MLC field boundary for each gantry angle. The BEV apertures were chosen to be the initial settings of aperture shapes and served as physical constraints of aperture settings. In the proposed algorithm, we utilized the fast adaptive simulated annealing (ASA) technique to select the field shapes defined by the MLC leaf coordinates. A descent gradient-based optimization technique was employed to search for the optimal aperture weights under the guidance of a conventional quadratic objective function. By combing the fast ASA with the descent gradient search algorithm, the computational efficiency was consistently improved. The beamlet-based inverse planning used the same objective function and the descent gradient-based optimization. Beamlet-based optimization with 1cm × 1cm size was used to obtain the optimized fluence maps (10 intensity levels). Three clinical cases (prostate, thoracic, and head and neck) were selected for the comparative study. For each case, the gantry angles are chosen manually and beamlet-based inverse planning was performed. Aperture based optimization was done with the same beam configuration and beam modality. A range of number of segments (5 to 25) was investigated. Plans with different number of segments were evaluated based on the DVH and dose distribution improvements and the treatment times involved. The combined aperture-based inverse planning algorithm was implemented and tested by comparing with conventional simulated annealing algorithm for aperture-based IMRT. The same quality plans were achieved but the computation time was reduced even by an order of magnitude. The improvement in performance directly was directly resulted from the fact that the objective function is well behaved analytical function with respect to beam weights. The key results found from the comparative study are that the dose distribution and DVHs were improved with the increase of the number of segments. When the number is increased up to ∼14, the dose distribution obtained from aperture based optimization is quite similar to that of the beamlet-based optimization provided the leaves can be adjusted in 0.2cm increments in the aperture-based inverse planning. Further increase of the segment number only lead to minor improvement in dose distributions with much increased computing time. Considering the tradeoff between the plan quality and planning time, it seems that the optimal number of segment is between 10 ∼ 20. Aperture-based inverse planning seems to be a viable option for IMRT and eliminating the step of leaf sequencing. For a few different disease sites, our study indicate that the technique can produce IMRT plans comparable with that of beamlet-based inverse planning when the number of segments per fields is above ∼10. The improvement saturates gradually as the number of segments increased to above ∼20.

Prefer Nested Segmentation to Compound Segmentation

Comprehensive and Clinically Accurate Head and Neck Cancer Organs-at-risk Delineation on a Multi-Institutional Study

Quantitative Comparison of Aperture-Based and Beamlet-Based Inverse Planning Techniques

Superficial Parotid Lobe-Sparing Delineation Approach: A Better Method Of Dose Optimization To Protect The Parotid Gland In Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy For Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

A Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation Approach for Anatomical Structures in Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy

Associations Between Radiation Oncologist Demographic Factors and Segmentation Similarity Benchmarks: Insights From a Crowd-Sourced Challenge Using Bayesian Estimation

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Quantitative differences in volumetric calculations for radiation dosimetry in segmental Y90 treatment planning using hybrid angiography-CT compared with anatomic segmentation

Incorporating Single-Side Sparing in Models for Predicting Parotid Dose Sparing in Head and Neck Imrt

Performance analysis and knowledge-based quality assurance of critical organ auto-segmentation for pediatric craniospinal irradiation

Impact of deep learning‐based multiorgan segmentation methods on patient‐specific internal dosimetry in PET/CT imaging: A comparative study

Automated Segmentation of the Parotid Gland Based on Atlas Registration and Machine Learning: A Longitudinal MRI Study in Head-and-Neck Radiation Therapy

SU‐GG‐T‐563: System for Treating Tumors with Necrotic Cores: Modeling and Experimental Results

Target and Organ Dose Estimation from Intensity Modulated Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Using 3 Deformable Image Registration Algorithms.

Machine Learning-Based Quality Assurance for Automatic Segmentation of Head-and-Neck Organs-at-Risk in Radiotherapy

MO-D-351-03: A Unified Approach to Beam Angle Selection and Dose Optimization with High-Throughput Computing for IMRT

On the significance of the different geometrical and dosimetric parameters in microbeam and minibeam radiation therapy a retrospective evaluation

Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance

Feasibility Study on Constructing Dosimetric Correlated Geometric Parameters for Automatic Segmentation Evaluation

A dosimetric evaluation of treatment planning based on optimal auto-segmentation

Divergent Clinical Equivalence Findings from DVH and NTCP Metrics for Alternative OAR Delineations with Increasing Setup Variability in Head-and-Neck Radiotherapy