Abstract:Purpose/ObjectiveAccurate targeting is of paramount importance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the presence of organ motion, the problem becomes complicated because of the interplay between the organ motion and MLC movement. The purpose of this work is to develop a general aperture-based inverse planning algorithm with consideration of organ motion to compensate or minimize the influence of the interplay between the two types of movements.Materials/MethodsWe implemented a hybrid aperture-based inverse planning algorithm that is capable of producing optimal shapes and weights of a pre-selected number of segments for each incident field. In this algorithm the variables defining the shapes of the involved segments and the weights of the segments were dealt separately by using a fast simulated annealing (ASA) and a descent gradient optimization. Two different scenarios were investigated: (i) the shapes of the organs (target and/or sensitive structures) remain unchanged during the organ motion process; and (ii) the shapes of the organs are deformable. A pre-requisition of the proposed aperture-based inverse planning algorithm is that the temporal process of each point within a structure has been acquired either before the treatment or during the treatment through the use of an adaptive algorithm and an online imaging system. In either case, the overall goal of the inverse planning is to minimize the temporally integrated dose to the sensitive structures while delivering a uniform integrated dose distribution to the target volume. The algorithm was first examined by using a phantom case with sinusoidally moving target and/or sensitive structures. The proposed technique was then used to plan four breast cases and dose distributions were computed for three different situations: (a) conventional aperture-based IMRT treatment without considering the breathing motion (other than the use of appropriate margins); (b) new aperture-based IMRT treatment with consideration of breathing motion; and (c) a hypothetical treatment where the segmented beams derived from (i) was used to irradiate the beast target volumes with breathing motion. Two opposed tangential fields (the beam energy was either 6 MV or 15 MV), each consists of 12 to 25 segments, were used for these plans. The three types of plans were compared quantitatively.ResultsIn both phantom and clinical case studies, we found that the organ motion severely deteriorated the dose distributions obtained using conventional aperture-based IMRT inverse planning with static organs even when appropriate margins were used. Generally, the level of deterioration increases with the level of intensity modulation or the number of segments of the incident beams. With the new algorithm, it was possible to significantly reduce the adverse dosimetric effect of the organ motion. For the same number of segments, the quality of the plan with organ motion was generally inferior to that without organ motion. To achieve similar target dose coverage and sensitive structure sparing as the static case, 15%–40% more segments were generally required when the organ motion was switched on. Further increase of the segment number would lead to better but clinically insignificant improvement. The demand for more segments tends to be less as the original number of segments for the static plan is large. The comparison results strongly depended on the amplitude of organ motion. It was also found that the deformation of the involved organs played less significant role provided that the level of deformation was within its practical range and provided that the deformation was accounted for on a case specific basis by using the inverse planning technique proposed here.ConclusionsAn inverse planning system with incorporation of organ motion was developed for aperture-based IMRT and the influence of organ motion on the final dose was investigated systematically. It was shown that the adverse dosimetric effect of organ motion can be compensated or minimized by the modified inverse planning algorithm with moderate increase of segmented fields. Together with organ tracking/imaging techniques, the approach may provide a practical solution to the clinically intractable problem of organ motion Purpose/ObjectiveAccurate targeting is of paramount importance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the presence of organ motion, the problem becomes complicated because of the interplay between the organ motion and MLC movement. The purpose of this work is to develop a general aperture-based inverse planning algorithm with consideration of organ motion to compensate or minimize the influence of the interplay between the two types of movements. Accurate targeting is of paramount importance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the presence of organ motion, the problem becomes complicated because of the interplay between the organ motion and MLC movement. The purpose of this work is to develop a general aperture-based inverse planning algorithm with consideration of organ motion to compensate or minimize the influence of the interplay between the two types of movements. Materials/MethodsWe implemented a hybrid aperture-based inverse planning algorithm that is capable of producing optimal shapes and weights of a pre-selected number of segments for each incident field. In this algorithm the variables defining the shapes of the involved segments and the weights of the segments were dealt separately by using a fast simulated annealing (ASA) and a descent gradient optimization. Two different scenarios were investigated: (i) the shapes of the organs (target and/or sensitive structures) remain unchanged during the organ motion process; and (ii) the shapes of the organs are deformable. A pre-requisition of the proposed aperture-based inverse planning algorithm is that the temporal process of each point within a structure has been acquired either before the treatment or during the treatment through the use of an adaptive algorithm and an online imaging system. In either case, the overall goal of the inverse planning is to minimize the temporally integrated dose to the sensitive structures while delivering a uniform integrated dose distribution to the target volume. The algorithm was first examined by using a phantom case with sinusoidally moving target and/or sensitive structures. The proposed technique was then used to plan four breast cases and dose distributions were computed for three different situations: (a) conventional aperture-based IMRT treatment without considering the breathing motion (other than the use of appropriate margins); (b) new aperture-based IMRT treatment with consideration of breathing motion; and (c) a hypothetical treatment where the segmented beams derived from (i) was used to irradiate the beast target volumes with breathing motion. Two opposed tangential fields (the beam energy was either 6 MV or 15 MV), each consists of 12 to 25 segments, were used for these plans. The three types of plans were compared quantitatively. We implemented a hybrid aperture-based inverse planning algorithm that is capable of producing optimal shapes and weights of a pre-selected number of segments for each incident field. In this algorithm the variables defining the shapes of the involved segments and the weights of the segments were dealt separately by using a fast simulated annealing (ASA) and a descent gradient optimization. Two different scenarios were investigated: (i) the shapes of the organs (target and/or sensitive structures) remain unchanged during the organ motion process; and (ii) the shapes of the organs are deformable. A pre-requisition of the proposed aperture-based inverse planning algorithm is that the temporal process of each point within a structure has been acquired either before the treatment or during the treatment through the use of an adaptive algorithm and an online imaging system. In either case, the overall goal of the inverse planning is to minimize the temporally integrated dose to the sensitive structures while delivering a uniform integrated dose distribution to the target volume. The algorithm was first examined by using a phantom case with sinusoidally moving target and/or sensitive structures. The proposed technique was then used to plan four breast cases and dose distributions were computed for three different situations: (a) conventional aperture-based IMRT treatment without considering the breathing motion (other than the use of appropriate margins); (b) new aperture-based IMRT treatment with consideration of breathing motion; and (c) a hypothetical treatment where the segmented beams derived from (i) was used to irradiate the beast target volumes with breathing motion. Two opposed tangential fields (the beam energy was either 6 MV or 15 MV), each consists of 12 to 25 segments, were used for these plans. The three types of plans were compared quantitatively. ResultsIn both phantom and clinical case studies, we found that the organ motion severely deteriorated the dose distributions obtained using conventional aperture-based IMRT inverse planning with static organs even when appropriate margins were used. Generally, the level of deterioration increases with the level of intensity modulation or the number of segments of the incident beams. With the new algorithm, it was possible to significantly reduce the adverse dosimetric effect of the organ motion. For the same number of segments, the quality of the plan with organ motion was generally inferior to that without organ motion. To achieve similar target dose coverage and sensitive structure sparing as the static case, 15%–40% more segments were generally required when the organ motion was switched on. Further increase of the segment number would lead to better but clinically insignificant improvement. The demand for more segments tends to be less as the original number of segments for the static plan is large. The comparison results strongly depended on the amplitude of organ motion. It was also found that the deformation of the involved organs played less significant role provided that the level of deformation was within its practical range and provided that the deformation was accounted for on a case specific basis by using the inverse planning technique proposed here. In both phantom and clinical case studies, we found that the organ motion severely deteriorated the dose distributions obtained using conventional aperture-based IMRT inverse planning with static organs even when appropriate margins were used. Generally, the level of deterioration increases with the level of intensity modulation or the number of segments of the incident beams. With the new algorithm, it was possible to significantly reduce the adverse dosimetric effect of the organ motion. For the same number of segments, the quality of the plan with organ motion was generally inferior to that without organ motion. To achieve similar target dose coverage and sensitive structure sparing as the static case, 15%–40% more segments were generally required when the organ motion was switched on. Further increase of the segment number would lead to better but clinically insignificant improvement. The demand for more segments tends to be less as the original number of segments for the static plan is large. The comparison results strongly depended on the amplitude of organ motion. It was also found that the deformation of the involved organs played less significant role provided that the level of deformation was within its practical range and provided that the deformation was accounted for on a case specific basis by using the inverse planning technique proposed here. ConclusionsAn inverse planning system with incorporation of organ motion was developed for aperture-based IMRT and the influence of organ motion on the final dose was investigated systematically. It was shown that the adverse dosimetric effect of organ motion can be compensated or minimized by the modified inverse planning algorithm with moderate increase of segmented fields. Together with organ tracking/imaging techniques, the approach may provide a practical solution to the clinically intractable problem of organ motion An inverse planning system with incorporation of organ motion was developed for aperture-based IMRT and the influence of organ motion on the final dose was investigated systematically. It was shown that the adverse dosimetric effect of organ motion can be compensated or minimized by the modified inverse planning algorithm with moderate increase of segmented fields. Together with organ tracking/imaging techniques, the approach may provide a practical solution to the clinically intractable problem of organ motion

Quantitative Comparison of Aperture-Based and Beamlet-Based Inverse Planning Techniques

A Feedback Constraint Optimization Method for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Intrinsic Spatial Heterogeneity in Inverse Planning and Its Significant Role in Defining the Universe of IMRT Solution Space

Quantitation of the a Priori Dosimetric Capabilities of Spatial Points in Inverse Planning and Its Significant Implication in Defining IMRT Solution Space.

MO-D-351-05: A “slicing” Approach for IMRT Optimization Using Linear Programming

Aperture-based IMRT Inverse Planning with Incorporation of Organ Motion

Atlas-based Dose Optimization Via Linear Programming for IMRT Using a High-throughput Computing Environment

Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans

Intelligent IoT-based large-scale inverse planning system considering postmodulation factors

A Two-Stage Sequential Linear Programming Approach to Imrt Dose Optimization

An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy

Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation

Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance

WE-E-BRA-02: Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

SU-FF-T-350: Optimizing the MLC Apertures for Conformal Radiotherapy with a Hybrid Algorithm

Automatic beam angle selection in IMRT planning using genetic algorithm.

Influence on Dose Distribution by Beam Direction and Beam Number in Inverse Intensity-Modulated for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

SU-E-T-713: Study On Application of Beam Angle Optimization for Multiple Intracranial Metastases

Inverse planning of lung radiotherapy with photon and proton beams using a discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver

Applying mixed-integer linear programming to the non-coplanar beam angle optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for liver cancer

SU-GG-T-38: Dosimetry and Inverse Treatment Planning for 3D Intensity Modulated Brachytherapy