Abstract:Purpose/ObjectiveAccurate targeting is of paramount importance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the presence of organ motion, the problem becomes complicated because of the interplay between the organ motion and MLC movement. The purpose of this work is to develop a general aperture-based inverse planning algorithm with consideration of organ motion to compensate or minimize the influence of the interplay between the two types of movements.Materials/MethodsWe implemented a hybrid aperture-based inverse planning algorithm that is capable of producing optimal shapes and weights of a pre-selected number of segments for each incident field. In this algorithm the variables defining the shapes of the involved segments and the weights of the segments were dealt separately by using a fast simulated annealing (ASA) and a descent gradient optimization. Two different scenarios were investigated: (i) the shapes of the organs (target and/or sensitive structures) remain unchanged during the organ motion process; and (ii) the shapes of the organs are deformable. A pre-requisition of the proposed aperture-based inverse planning algorithm is that the temporal process of each point within a structure has been acquired either before the treatment or during the treatment through the use of an adaptive algorithm and an online imaging system. In either case, the overall goal of the inverse planning is to minimize the temporally integrated dose to the sensitive structures while delivering a uniform integrated dose distribution to the target volume. The algorithm was first examined by using a phantom case with sinusoidally moving target and/or sensitive structures. The proposed technique was then used to plan four breast cases and dose distributions were computed for three different situations: (a) conventional aperture-based IMRT treatment without considering the breathing motion (other than the use of appropriate margins); (b) new aperture-based IMRT treatment with consideration of breathing motion; and (c) a hypothetical treatment where the segmented beams derived from (i) was used to irradiate the beast target volumes with breathing motion. Two opposed tangential fields (the beam energy was either 6 MV or 15 MV), each consists of 12 to 25 segments, were used for these plans. The three types of plans were compared quantitatively.ResultsIn both phantom and clinical case studies, we found that the organ motion severely deteriorated the dose distributions obtained using conventional aperture-based IMRT inverse planning with static organs even when appropriate margins were used. Generally, the level of deterioration increases with the level of intensity modulation or the number of segments of the incident beams. With the new algorithm, it was possible to significantly reduce the adverse dosimetric effect of the organ motion. For the same number of segments, the quality of the plan with organ motion was generally inferior to that without organ motion. To achieve similar target dose coverage and sensitive structure sparing as the static case, 15%–40% more segments were generally required when the organ motion was switched on. Further increase of the segment number would lead to better but clinically insignificant improvement. The demand for more segments tends to be less as the original number of segments for the static plan is large. The comparison results strongly depended on the amplitude of organ motion. It was also found that the deformation of the involved organs played less significant role provided that the level of deformation was within its practical range and provided that the deformation was accounted for on a case specific basis by using the inverse planning technique proposed here.ConclusionsAn inverse planning system with incorporation of organ motion was developed for aperture-based IMRT and the influence of organ motion on the final dose was investigated systematically. It was shown that the adverse dosimetric effect of organ motion can be compensated or minimized by the modified inverse planning algorithm with moderate increase of segmented fields. Together with organ tracking/imaging techniques, the approach may provide a practical solution to the clinically intractable problem of organ motion Purpose/ObjectiveAccurate targeting is of paramount importance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the presence of organ motion, the problem becomes complicated because of the interplay between the organ motion and MLC movement. The purpose of this work is to develop a general aperture-based inverse planning algorithm with consideration of organ motion to compensate or minimize the influence of the interplay between the two types of movements. Accurate targeting is of paramount importance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the presence of organ motion, the problem becomes complicated because of the interplay between the organ motion and MLC movement. The purpose of this work is to develop a general aperture-based inverse planning algorithm with consideration of organ motion to compensate or minimize the influence of the interplay between the two types of movements. Materials/MethodsWe implemented a hybrid aperture-based inverse planning algorithm that is capable of producing optimal shapes and weights of a pre-selected number of segments for each incident field. In this algorithm the variables defining the shapes of the involved segments and the weights of the segments were dealt separately by using a fast simulated annealing (ASA) and a descent gradient optimization. Two different scenarios were investigated: (i) the shapes of the organs (target and/or sensitive structures) remain unchanged during the organ motion process; and (ii) the shapes of the organs are deformable. A pre-requisition of the proposed aperture-based inverse planning algorithm is that the temporal process of each point within a structure has been acquired either before the treatment or during the treatment through the use of an adaptive algorithm and an online imaging system. In either case, the overall goal of the inverse planning is to minimize the temporally integrated dose to the sensitive structures while delivering a uniform integrated dose distribution to the target volume. The algorithm was first examined by using a phantom case with sinusoidally moving target and/or sensitive structures. The proposed technique was then used to plan four breast cases and dose distributions were computed for three different situations: (a) conventional aperture-based IMRT treatment without considering the breathing motion (other than the use of appropriate margins); (b) new aperture-based IMRT treatment with consideration of breathing motion; and (c) a hypothetical treatment where the segmented beams derived from (i) was used to irradiate the beast target volumes with breathing motion. Two opposed tangential fields (the beam energy was either 6 MV or 15 MV), each consists of 12 to 25 segments, were used for these plans. The three types of plans were compared quantitatively. We implemented a hybrid aperture-based inverse planning algorithm that is capable of producing optimal shapes and weights of a pre-selected number of segments for each incident field. In this algorithm the variables defining the shapes of the involved segments and the weights of the segments were dealt separately by using a fast simulated annealing (ASA) and a descent gradient optimization. Two different scenarios were investigated: (i) the shapes of the organs (target and/or sensitive structures) remain unchanged during the organ motion process; and (ii) the shapes of the organs are deformable. A pre-requisition of the proposed aperture-based inverse planning algorithm is that the temporal process of each point within a structure has been acquired either before the treatment or during the treatment through the use of an adaptive algorithm and an online imaging system. In either case, the overall goal of the inverse planning is to minimize the temporally integrated dose to the sensitive structures while delivering a uniform integrated dose distribution to the target volume. The algorithm was first examined by using a phantom case with sinusoidally moving target and/or sensitive structures. The proposed technique was then used to plan four breast cases and dose distributions were computed for three different situations: (a) conventional aperture-based IMRT treatment without considering the breathing motion (other than the use of appropriate margins); (b) new aperture-based IMRT treatment with consideration of breathing motion; and (c) a hypothetical treatment where the segmented beams derived from (i) was used to irradiate the beast target volumes with breathing motion. Two opposed tangential fields (the beam energy was either 6 MV or 15 MV), each consists of 12 to 25 segments, were used for these plans. The three types of plans were compared quantitatively. ResultsIn both phantom and clinical case studies, we found that the organ motion severely deteriorated the dose distributions obtained using conventional aperture-based IMRT inverse planning with static organs even when appropriate margins were used. Generally, the level of deterioration increases with the level of intensity modulation or the number of segments of the incident beams. With the new algorithm, it was possible to significantly reduce the adverse dosimetric effect of the organ motion. For the same number of segments, the quality of the plan with organ motion was generally inferior to that without organ motion. To achieve similar target dose coverage and sensitive structure sparing as the static case, 15%–40% more segments were generally required when the organ motion was switched on. Further increase of the segment number would lead to better but clinically insignificant improvement. The demand for more segments tends to be less as the original number of segments for the static plan is large. The comparison results strongly depended on the amplitude of organ motion. It was also found that the deformation of the involved organs played less significant role provided that the level of deformation was within its practical range and provided that the deformation was accounted for on a case specific basis by using the inverse planning technique proposed here. In both phantom and clinical case studies, we found that the organ motion severely deteriorated the dose distributions obtained using conventional aperture-based IMRT inverse planning with static organs even when appropriate margins were used. Generally, the level of deterioration increases with the level of intensity modulation or the number of segments of the incident beams. With the new algorithm, it was possible to significantly reduce the adverse dosimetric effect of the organ motion. For the same number of segments, the quality of the plan with organ motion was generally inferior to that without organ motion. To achieve similar target dose coverage and sensitive structure sparing as the static case, 15%–40% more segments were generally required when the organ motion was switched on. Further increase of the segment number would lead to better but clinically insignificant improvement. The demand for more segments tends to be less as the original number of segments for the static plan is large. The comparison results strongly depended on the amplitude of organ motion. It was also found that the deformation of the involved organs played less significant role provided that the level of deformation was within its practical range and provided that the deformation was accounted for on a case specific basis by using the inverse planning technique proposed here. ConclusionsAn inverse planning system with incorporation of organ motion was developed for aperture-based IMRT and the influence of organ motion on the final dose was investigated systematically. It was shown that the adverse dosimetric effect of organ motion can be compensated or minimized by the modified inverse planning algorithm with moderate increase of segmented fields. Together with organ tracking/imaging techniques, the approach may provide a practical solution to the clinically intractable problem of organ motion An inverse planning system with incorporation of organ motion was developed for aperture-based IMRT and the influence of organ motion on the final dose was investigated systematically. It was shown that the adverse dosimetric effect of organ motion can be compensated or minimized by the modified inverse planning algorithm with moderate increase of segmented fields. Together with organ tracking/imaging techniques, the approach may provide a practical solution to the clinically intractable problem of organ motion

Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is clinically identified using both Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and orthogonal X-ray angiographies (OXA). However there are discrepancies between the two image findings due to the performance uncertainties of the two imaging modalities. Sensitivity and specificity are used to quantify the performance characteristics of an imaging device. The purpose of this project is to develop a framework that integrates performance characteristics of MRA and OXA into AVM radiosurgery planning and evaluation.Materials/MethodsTen patients with AVM located in critical areas such as occipital or left temple lobe were recruited in this retrospective planning study. The image findings of the 10 patients were first utilized to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of MRA and OXA. Instead of accepting the observation from imaging as a binary (yes or no) mapping of AVM location, our alternative is to translate the image into an AVM probability distribution map by incorporating the sensitivity and specificity of the imaging devices, and use such a map as a basis for treatment planning and evaluation. Three sets of radiosurgery plans, targeting at the MRA and OXA positive overlap, at MRA positive only, and at OXA positive only were optimized for best conformality via the GammaPlan® system. AVM obliteration rate (ORAVM) was calculated using the dose volume histogram and AVM probability distribution. Late toxicity to brain tissue was evaluated using the volume receiving more than 12 Gy (V12). Both ORAVM and V12 served as end points for plan comparison.ResultsIn our 10 patient study, the positive overlap of MRA and OXA accounted for 90.5 ± 8.1% of the MRA positive only volume, and 61.9 ± 7.8% of the OXA positive only volume. The sensitivities and specificities of MRA and OXA were estimated to be (0.95, 0.74) and (0.71, 0.95), respectively. The probability of being true AVM was estimated to be 0.994 ± 0.005 in the MRA and OXA positive overlap zone, 0.560 ± 0.261 in the MRA positive and OXA negative zone, 0.642 ± 0.125 in the MRA negative and XA positive zone, and 0.083 ± 0.071 in the MRA and OXA negative overlap zone, respectively. Compared to plans targeting at the MRA and OXA positive overlap, plans targeting at the MRA positive and at the OXA positive improved ORAVM by 4.1 ± 1.9% and 15.7 ± 8.3%, respectively, while also increasing V12 1.88 ± 1.36 cc and 6.91 ± 2.14 cc, respectively. Attempts of shaping the dose distribution according to the AVM probability map suggested that dose reductions of 2–3 Gy in the zone where MRA and OXA disagree could be applied to spare the surrounding critical brain tissue.ConclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of MRA and OXA should be incorporated into AVM radiosurgery planning to better assist clinicians' decision making with regard to target definition and plan evaluation. Purpose/Objective(s)Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is clinically identified using both Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and orthogonal X-ray angiographies (OXA). However there are discrepancies between the two image findings due to the performance uncertainties of the two imaging modalities. Sensitivity and specificity are used to quantify the performance characteristics of an imaging device. The purpose of this project is to develop a framework that integrates performance characteristics of MRA and OXA into AVM radiosurgery planning and evaluation. Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is clinically identified using both Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and orthogonal X-ray angiographies (OXA). However there are discrepancies between the two image findings due to the performance uncertainties of the two imaging modalities. Sensitivity and specificity are used to quantify the performance characteristics of an imaging device. The purpose of this project is to develop a framework that integrates performance characteristics of MRA and OXA into AVM radiosurgery planning and evaluation. Materials/MethodsTen patients with AVM located in critical areas such as occipital or left temple lobe were recruited in this retrospective planning study. The image findings of the 10 patients were first utilized to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of MRA and OXA. Instead of accepting the observation from imaging as a binary (yes or no) mapping of AVM location, our alternative is to translate the image into an AVM probability distribution map by incorporating the sensitivity and specificity of the imaging devices, and use such a map as a basis for treatment planning and evaluation. Three sets of radiosurgery plans, targeting at the MRA and OXA positive overlap, at MRA positive only, and at OXA positive only were optimized for best conformality via the GammaPlan® system. AVM obliteration rate (ORAVM) was calculated using the dose volume histogram and AVM probability distribution. Late toxicity to brain tissue was evaluated using the volume receiving more than 12 Gy (V12). Both ORAVM and V12 served as end points for plan comparison. Ten patients with AVM located in critical areas such as occipital or left temple lobe were recruited in this retrospective planning study. The image findings of the 10 patients were first utilized to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of MRA and OXA. Instead of accepting the observation from imaging as a binary (yes or no) mapping of AVM location, our alternative is to translate the image into an AVM probability distribution map by incorporating the sensitivity and specificity of the imaging devices, and use such a map as a basis for treatment planning and evaluation. Three sets of radiosurgery plans, targeting at the MRA and OXA positive overlap, at MRA positive only, and at OXA positive only were optimized for best conformality via the GammaPlan® system. AVM obliteration rate (ORAVM) was calculated using the dose volume histogram and AVM probability distribution. Late toxicity to brain tissue was evaluated using the volume receiving more than 12 Gy (V12). Both ORAVM and V12 served as end points for plan comparison. ResultsIn our 10 patient study, the positive overlap of MRA and OXA accounted for 90.5 ± 8.1% of the MRA positive only volume, and 61.9 ± 7.8% of the OXA positive only volume. The sensitivities and specificities of MRA and OXA were estimated to be (0.95, 0.74) and (0.71, 0.95), respectively. The probability of being true AVM was estimated to be 0.994 ± 0.005 in the MRA and OXA positive overlap zone, 0.560 ± 0.261 in the MRA positive and OXA negative zone, 0.642 ± 0.125 in the MRA negative and XA positive zone, and 0.083 ± 0.071 in the MRA and OXA negative overlap zone, respectively. Compared to plans targeting at the MRA and OXA positive overlap, plans targeting at the MRA positive and at the OXA positive improved ORAVM by 4.1 ± 1.9% and 15.7 ± 8.3%, respectively, while also increasing V12 1.88 ± 1.36 cc and 6.91 ± 2.14 cc, respectively. Attempts of shaping the dose distribution according to the AVM probability map suggested that dose reductions of 2–3 Gy in the zone where MRA and OXA disagree could be applied to spare the surrounding critical brain tissue. In our 10 patient study, the positive overlap of MRA and OXA accounted for 90.5 ± 8.1% of the MRA positive only volume, and 61.9 ± 7.8% of the OXA positive only volume. The sensitivities and specificities of MRA and OXA were estimated to be (0.95, 0.74) and (0.71, 0.95), respectively. The probability of being true AVM was estimated to be 0.994 ± 0.005 in the MRA and OXA positive overlap zone, 0.560 ± 0.261 in the MRA positive and OXA negative zone, 0.642 ± 0.125 in the MRA negative and XA positive zone, and 0.083 ± 0.071 in the MRA and OXA negative overlap zone, respectively. Compared to plans targeting at the MRA and OXA positive overlap, plans targeting at the MRA positive and at the OXA positive improved ORAVM by 4.1 ± 1.9% and 15.7 ± 8.3%, respectively, while also increasing V12 1.88 ± 1.36 cc and 6.91 ± 2.14 cc, respectively. Attempts of shaping the dose distribution according to the AVM probability map suggested that dose reductions of 2–3 Gy in the zone where MRA and OXA disagree could be applied to spare the surrounding critical brain tissue. ConclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of MRA and OXA should be incorporated into AVM radiosurgery planning to better assist clinicians' decision making with regard to target definition and plan evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA and OXA should be incorporated into AVM radiosurgery planning to better assist clinicians' decision making with regard to target definition and plan evaluation.

Aperture-based IMRT Inverse Planning with Incorporation of Organ Motion

Quantitative Comparison of Aperture-Based and Beamlet-Based Inverse Planning Techniques

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans

MO-D-351-05: A “slicing” Approach for IMRT Optimization Using Linear Programming

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes

Motion-Inclusive Treatment Planning to Assess Normal Tissue Dose for Central Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Deterministic direct aperture optimization using multiphase piecewise constant segmentation

Intelligent IoT-based large-scale inverse planning system considering postmodulation factors

Leaf sequencing via difference matrices reduces aperture number and beam-on time in IMRT

Adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy using 4D robust planning: a proof-of-concept for the application of dose mimicking approach

Physics-Based Patient-Specific Respiration Modeling For 4d Treatment Planning

Three Dimensional Intensity Modulated Brachytherapy (Imbt): Dosimetry Algorithm And Inverse Treatment Planning

Atlas-based Dose Optimization Via Linear Programming for IMRT Using a High-throughput Computing Environment

Real Time 4d Imrt Treatment Planning Based On A Dynamic Virtual Patient Model: Proof Of Concept

Fast 4d Modeling for Real-Time Motion Management in Radiation Therapy

How Do Sensitivity and Specificity of Imaging Modalities Affect AVM Radiosurgery Planning and Evaluation

WE-E-BRA-02: Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Four-dimensional inverse treatment planning with inclusion of implanted fiducials in IMRT segmented fields

Intrafraction organ movement in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy of abdominal lesions - dosimetric impact and how to detect its extent in advance