Performance Study of Biomass Pyrolysis, Char Gasification and Oxy-Fuel Combustion Integrated System

Mingxi Zhou,Ruochen Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/es2024-130362
2024-07-15
Abstract:To investigate the technical feasibility of integrating biomass pyrolysis, char gasification, and oxy-fuel combustion, Aspen Plus was applied to evaluate the performance of different systems. Three technical routes were proposed: “Route 1” and “Route 2” involve coupling oxy-fuel combustion with biomass pyrolysis and char gasification, aiming to utilize char gasification for recovering high-temperature flue gas, while “Route 3” only couples oxy-fuel combustion with biomass pyrolysis. Energy saving and fossil CO2 emissions were compared across different technical routes, and economic evaluations were conducted. Two feedstock types (Reed straw or Municipal solid waste, MSW) were selected for analysis. The results indicate that “Route 2” saves more NG consumption, accompanying an increase in flue gas flow rate. Due to the poor quality of MSW, the waste char gasification temperature is 10% lower than that of biochar, resulting in a lower combustible gas content (CO+H2) in syngas from waste char gasification compared to biochar gasification by 18% under identical feedstock input (1t/h) and flue gas recycle ratio (10% or 20%). Biomass demonstrates an advantage in reducing fossil CO2 emissions compared to MSW, particularly evident in “Route 2-Bio” where fossil CO2 emissions decrease by 95% compared to the “Normal” case. Without factoring in CO2 tax, the price of biomass is significant. In the scenario of a 46 tons/day oxy-fuel glass furnace, “Route 2” offers the most promising OPEX savings. As long as the price of biomass raw materials is below 870 RMB/ton, it can lead to OPEX savings. If CO2 tax is considered, biomass as a feedstock proves to be more competitive than MSW in OPEX savings.
Environmental Science,Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?