Abstract:Introduction: Hearing loss is a major global public health issue that negatively impacts quality of life, communication, cognition, social participation, and mental health. The cochlear implant (CI) is the most efficacious treatment for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, variability in outcomes remains high among CI users. Our previous research demonstrated that the existing subjective methodology of CI programming does not consistently produce optimal stimulation for speech perception, thereby limiting the potential for CI users to derive the maximum device benefit to achieve their peak potential. We demonstrated the benefit of utilising the objective method of measuring auditory-evoked cortical responses to speech stimuli as a reliable tool to guide and verify CI programming and, in turn, significantly improve speech perception performance. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of patient- and device-specific factors on the application of acoustically-evoked cortical auditory-evoked potential (aCAEP) measures as an objective clinical tool to verify CI mapping in adult CI users with bilateral deafness (BD). Methods: aCAEP responses were elicited using binaural peripheral auditory stimulation for four speech tokens (/m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/) and recorded by HEARLab™ software in adult BD CI users. Participants were classified into groups according to subjective or objective CI mapping procedures to elicit present aCAEP responses to all four speech tokens. The impact of patient- and device-specific factors on the presence of aCAEP responses and speech perception was investigated between participant groups. Results: Participants were categorised based on the presence or absence of the P1-N1-P2 aCAEP response to speech tokens. Out of the total cohort of adult CI users (n = 132), 63 participants demonstrated present responses pre-optimisation, 37 participants exhibited present responses post-optimisation, and the remaining 32 participants either showed an absent response for at least one speech token post-optimisation or did not accept the optimised CI map adjustments. Overall, no significant correlation was shown between patient and device-specific factors and the presence of aCAEP responses or speech perception scores. Conclusion: This study reinforces that aCAEP measures offer an objective, non-invasive approach to verify CI mapping, irrespective of patient or device factors. These findings further our understanding of the importance of personalised CI rehabilitation through CI mapping to minimise the degree of speech perception variation post-CI and allow all CI users to achieve maximum device benefit.

Cochlear implant referral patterns in the UK suggest a postcode lottery with inequitable access for older adults; results of a pilot audit in five Audiology sites

International survey of cochlear implant candidacy

Identifying Disadvantaged Groups for Cochlear Implantation: Demographics from a Large Cochlear Implant Program

Impact of NICE technology appraisal guidance TA566 on access to cochlear implantation for children using hearing aids in the United Kingdom: a multisite observational study

Children using a unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid: bimodal hearing outcomes when one ear is outside the UK (NICE 2009) audiological criteria for cochlear implantation - a single site case-control study

Distance and Socieoeconomic Status as Barriers to Cochlear Implantation

Cochlear Implant Awareness in the United States: A National Survey of 15,138 Adults

Cochlear-implanted children from homes where English is an additional language: findings from a recent audit in one London centre

Current Profile of Adults Presenting for Preoperative Cochlear Implant Evaluation

Perspectives on Support Material for Referrals to Cochlear Implantation Teams

A qualitative exploration of the assessment process to cochlear implantation for children with hearing loss

Barriers to Cochlear Implant Uptake in Adults: A Scoping Review

Hearing aid utilization in Ontario - a population based study

Embedding audiological screening within memory clinic care pathway for individuals at risk of cognitive decline—patient perspectives

Early cochlear implantation: exploring electrophysiological thresholds and their role in pre-behavioural recommendations

The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials

'Real-life' benefit of hearing preservation cochlear implantation in the paediatric population: a single-site case-control study

Demographic Representation in Clinical Research Relative to a Cochlear Implant Patient Population

Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review

Determining cochlear implant candidacy in children with residual hearing: A scoping review

Socioeconomic Inequality in the Head and Neck Cancer Referral System: Redressing the Balance