Perspectives on Support Material for Referrals to Cochlear Implantation Teams
Marjan Mashal,Agnes Au,Jaime Leigh,Dayse Távora-Vieira,Andre Wedekind,Karen Pedley,Nina Swiderski,Ronel Chester-Browne,Caroline Balke,Jane Brew,Anthea Arkcoll,Maria R Dahm,Isabelle Boisvert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00127
2022-03-03
Abstract:Purpose: This study used a collaborative approach to explore the needs, barriers, and facilitators to developing cochlear implant referral information material that would be valuable for hard of hearing adults and referring audiologists. Method: During the development of a prototype referral aid to be used within the Australian context, a multistage qualitative study was conducted using a consultative process, informal and semistructured interviews, as well as online surveys. A deductive directed content analysis approach was applied to assess respondents' perspectives. A total of 106 participants (37 hard of hearing adults and 69 audiologists) were involved across the multiple phases of this study. Results: Referral practices for the evaluation of cochlear implantation candidacy in Australia are highly inconsistent, supporting the need to streamline referral information. The following facilitators were identified to support the development of referral material: appropriate content, perceived patient benefit, and objectivity. Areas for improvement related to the broadness of the content, impact on professional identity, and accessibility. Conclusions: Practical insight from patients and referrers can inform the development of patient-facing material related to cochlear implant referrals. Streamlining information used in educational material could alleviate confusion inherent to varied health literacy levels and support patients in making informed decisions related to pursuing, or not, cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation services.