Comparative study of three endoscopic modes in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions
YIN Cheng-long,XU Fang-yuan,YUAN Zhi-ping,SUN Chao,ZHU Ye,SHI Rui-hua,YANG Shu-ping,YU Lian-zhen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2013.04.003
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical application value of white light imaging( WLI),narrow-band imaging( NBI) and Lugol' s iodine staining in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. Methods One hundred and three patients were enrolled from January 2010 to January2013. Esophageal mucosa was examined by first using WLI,second NBI,and third after Lugol' s iodine staining. One hundred and twenty-five lesions which included 16 esophageal inflammatory,44 mild dysplasia,25 moderate dysplasia and 22 severe dysplasia,18 early esophageal cancer were found. All lesions were confirmed by pathologic diagnosis as the gold standard. Then the detection rates of the 3 modes and other related indicators were compared. While the NBI grading and Lugol's iodine staining classification of the lesions were compared with pathological diagnosis. Results( 1) One hundred and twenty-five lesions were found in 103 patients. The WLI,NBI and Lugol's iodine staining detected 85( 68. 0%),105( 84. 0%)and 109( 87. 2%) early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions respectively. There was no significant difference between NBI and Lugol' s iodine staining in detecting rate. The detection rate of WLI was lower than NBI and Lugol's iodine staining,and differences were statistically significant( χ2= 8. 772,P = 0. 003;χ2= 13. 255,P = 0. 000).( 2) Both the sensitivities for severe dysplasia and early esophageal cancer of NBI and Lugol's iodine staining were 100%( 40 /40),which were apparently higher than WLI 85. 0%( 34 /40)( both χ2= 4. 505,P = 0. 026). There was no significant difference in detecting mild and moderate dysplasia between NBI and Lugol's iodine staining [94. 2%( 65 /69) vs 100%( 69 /69) ],both of which were higher than WLI 73. 91%( 51 /69)( χ2= 10. 599,P = 0. 001; χ2= 20. 700,P = 0. 000). NBI grading and Lugol's iodine staining grading for severe dysplasia and early esophageal cancer lesions were mostly grade Ⅰ[90. 0%( 36/40),95. 0%( 38/40) ],and for mild and moderate dysplasia lesions were mostly grade Ⅱand Ⅲ [both were 94. 2%( 65 /69) ],and differences were statistically significant( χ2= 18. 373,23. 736,39. 371,39. 371,all P = 0. 000). Conclusions NBI and Lugol's iodine staining are able to show the scope and size of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions more clearly,contribute to a more accurate biopsy,thereby enhancing lesion detection rate. NBI appears as effective as Lugol's iodine staining to detect early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions,and they are significantly better than WLI. NBI and Lugol's iodine staining can be used as a complementary means to diagnose early esophageal cancer.